Comments on: Voting for reports in maemo.org Bugzilla http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/2008/12/20/voting-for-reports-in-maemoorg-bugzilla/ i'm not dead yet, but i'm working on it. Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:04:47 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: aklapper http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/2008/12/20/voting-for-reports-in-maemoorg-bugzilla/comment-page-1/#comment-347 aklapper Sun, 21 Dec 2008 18:48:17 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/?p=176#comment-347 @rawsausage: If you'd like to help improving the process or have constructive criticism, then please elaborate. @rawsausage: If you’d like to help improving the process or have constructive criticism, then please elaborate.

]]> By: rps http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/2008/12/20/voting-for-reports-in-maemoorg-bugzilla/comment-page-1/#comment-346 rps Sat, 20 Dec 2008 20:17:43 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/?p=176#comment-346 @rawsausage: ".. to identify the main issues that the Internet Tablet users and maemo.org community members have." is subjective, although problematically with a too small set of voting users. Your "Argumentum ad populum." would apply only if the voting results would be treated as being "the objective main issues of maemo" in striving for being the (objectively) best Whateveryoucallit-System. @rawsausage:
“.. to identify the main issues that the Internet Tablet users and maemo.org community members have.” is subjective, although problematically with a too small set of voting users.

Your “Argumentum ad populum.” would apply only if the voting results would be treated as being “the objective main issues of maemo” in striving for being the (objectively) best Whateveryoucallit-System.

]]> By: rawsausage http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/2008/12/20/voting-for-reports-in-maemoorg-bugzilla/comment-page-1/#comment-345 rawsausage Sat, 20 Dec 2008 11:30:12 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/?p=176#comment-345 Argumentum ad populum. Argumentum ad populum.

]]>