<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GNOME 3.0 Schedule draft; Streamlining of the Platform.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/2009/04/02/gnome3schedule/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/2009/04/02/gnome3schedule/</link>
	<description>i'm not dead yet, but i'm working on it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:04:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Emcken</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/2009/04/02/gnome3schedule/comment-page-1/#comment-384</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Emcken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 20:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/?p=246#comment-384</guid>
		<description>A great feature IMO to add to Gnome would be Gnome-Do:
http://do.davebsd.com/

This is also an exiting read about Do&#039;ifying GTK:
http://www.cimitan.com/blog/2009/01/31/do-ifying-gtk-30/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great feature IMO to add to Gnome would be Gnome-Do:<br />
<a href="http://do.davebsd.com/" rel="nofollow">http://do.davebsd.com/</a></p>
<p>This is also an exiting read about Do&#8217;ifying GTK:<br />
<a href="http://www.cimitan.com/blog/2009/01/31/do-ifying-gtk-30/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cimitan.com/blog/2009/01/31/do-ifying-gtk-30/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gnome 3.0 - please integrate Gnome-Do &#124; Jacob&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/2009/04/02/gnome3schedule/comment-page-1/#comment-383</link>
		<dc:creator>Gnome 3.0 - please integrate Gnome-Do &#124; Jacob&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 20:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/?p=246#comment-383</guid>
		<description>[...] reading the the Gnome 3.0 announcements (Vincent Untz, Andre Klapper) yesterday and reading The Plan, I don&#8217;t really know if I got exited or [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reading the the Gnome 3.0 announcements (Vincent Untz, Andre Klapper) yesterday and reading The Plan, I don&#8217;t really know if I got exited or [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nelson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/2009/04/02/gnome3schedule/comment-page-1/#comment-382</link>
		<dc:creator>Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 20:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/?p=246#comment-382</guid>
		<description>@aklapper: the definition of wontfix is &quot;The problem described is a bug which will never be fixed&quot; which seems a bit disappointed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/2009/04/02/gnome3schedule/#comment-380">aklapper</a>: the definition of wontfix is &#8220;The problem described is a bug which will never be fixed&#8221; which seems a bit disappointed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Robinson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/2009/04/02/gnome3schedule/comment-page-1/#comment-381</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 19:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/?p=246#comment-381</guid>
		<description>I noticed abiword is missing from the conversion matrix that is a very useful app.

http://www.gnome.org/~fpeters/299.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed abiword is missing from the conversion matrix that is a very useful app.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gnome.org/~fpeters/299.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.gnome.org/~fpeters/299.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aklapper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/2009/04/02/gnome3schedule/comment-page-1/#comment-380</link>
		<dc:creator>aklapper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/?p=246#comment-380</guid>
		<description>@Nelson: 505638 is definitely something that has nothing to do at all with GNOME 3 but from my point of view would just make the debate less streamlined and noisy. It&#039;s a very minor issue, it&#039;s WONTFIXed by two devs, and patches are still accepted (read the definition of WONTFIX in Bugzilla).
No need to mention &quot;GNOME 3&quot; at all in this context.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/2009/04/02/gnome3schedule/#comment-382">Nelson</a>: 505638 is definitely something that has nothing to do at all with GNOME 3 but from my point of view would just make the debate less streamlined and noisy. It&#8217;s a very minor issue, it&#8217;s WONTFIXed by two devs, and patches are still accepted (read the definition of WONTFIX in Bugzilla).<br />
No need to mention &#8220;GNOME 3&#8243; at all in this context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nelson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/2009/04/02/gnome3schedule/comment-page-1/#comment-379</link>
		<dc:creator>Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/?p=246#comment-379</guid>
		<description>Ok, it&#039;s already in bugzilla http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=505638 , will try to look at it and bring people attention in the future, when there&#039;s some breakage work being done for gnome 3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, it&#8217;s already in bugzilla <a href="http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=505638" rel="nofollow">http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=505638</a> , will try to look at it and bring people attention in the future, when there&#8217;s some breakage work being done for gnome 3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aklapper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/2009/04/02/gnome3schedule/comment-page-1/#comment-378</link>
		<dc:creator>aklapper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/?p=246#comment-378</guid>
		<description>@Nelson: In general, clear and single-application enhancement requests should go to GNOME Bugzilla, where all enhancement requests go to: http://bugzilla.gnome.org .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/2009/04/02/gnome3schedule/#comment-382">Nelson</a>: In general, clear and single-application enhancement requests should go to GNOME Bugzilla, where all enhancement requests go to: <a href="http://bugzilla.gnome.org" rel="nofollow">http://bugzilla.gnome.org</a> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aklapper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/2009/04/02/gnome3schedule/comment-page-1/#comment-377</link>
		<dc:creator>aklapper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/?p=246#comment-377</guid>
		<description>@Nelson: If it&#039;s not some kind of small wishlist idea or &quot;complete rewrite&quot; but related to something already mentioned by Vincent, I&#039;d say that the thread on desktop-devel-list is probably the best place. I really want to avoid bikeshed debated and the &quot;GNOME 3 playground&quot; that we had for the last four years (people popping up with non-feasible ideas)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/2009/04/02/gnome3schedule/#comment-382">Nelson</a>: If it&#8217;s not some kind of small wishlist idea or &#8220;complete rewrite&#8221; but related to something already mentioned by Vincent, I&#8217;d say that the thread on desktop-devel-list is probably the best place. I really want to avoid bikeshed debated and the &#8220;GNOME 3 playground&#8221; that we had for the last four years (people popping up with non-feasible ideas)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nelson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/2009/04/02/gnome3schedule/comment-page-1/#comment-376</link>
		<dc:creator>Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/?p=246#comment-376</guid>
		<description>Hi, where is the correct place to make suggestions about new feature/ideas in Gnome 3.0? ddl mail? wiki? I would like to add an item in case someone is interested and wants to help with it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, where is the correct place to make suggestions about new feature/ideas in Gnome 3.0? ddl mail? wiki? I would like to add an item in case someone is interested and wants to help with it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThreePointZero &#171; Lucas Rocha</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/2009/04/02/gnome3schedule/comment-page-1/#comment-375</link>
		<dc:creator>ThreePointZero &#171; Lucas Rocha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 11:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/?p=246#comment-375</guid>
		<description>[...] and Andre blogged about it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and Andre blogged about it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
