Comments on: Continuing adventures of bonobo and gnome-vfs http://blogs.gnome.org/alexl/2006/07/07/continuing-adventures-of-bonobo-and-gnome-vfs/ Cool links and commentary Fri, 29 Aug 2008 03:26:16 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 By: Jonh Arson http://blogs.gnome.org/alexl/2006/07/07/continuing-adventures-of-bonobo-and-gnome-vfs/#comment-132 Jonh Arson Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/alexl/2006/07/07/continuing-adventures-of-bonobo-and-gnome-vfs/#comment-132 Heh, nice stuff, keep on the good work ... Gnome got some of those evil dep i will be more than happy to see disapear. Maybe atacking cyclic deps too at some point in the future and make them less evil would be something too. Heh, nice stuff, keep on the good work … Gnome got some of those evil dep i will be more than happy to see disapear. Maybe atacking cyclic deps too at some point in the future and make them less evil would be something too.

]]> By: Laurent Goujon http://blogs.gnome.org/alexl/2006/07/07/continuing-adventures-of-bonobo-and-gnome-vfs/#comment-133 Laurent Goujon Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/alexl/2006/07/07/continuing-adventures-of-bonobo-and-gnome-vfs/#comment-133 Almost fine but unfortunately it breaked gnome-python. See bug 346910 on b.g.o Almost fine but unfortunately it breaked gnome-python. See bug 346910 on b.g.o

]]> By: Emmanuele Bassi http://blogs.gnome.org/alexl/2006/07/07/continuing-adventures-of-bonobo-and-gnome-vfs/#comment-134 Emmanuele Bassi Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/alexl/2006/07/07/continuing-adventures-of-bonobo-and-gnome-vfs/#comment-134 any plans on integrating the patches to make gconf depend on dbus too? also, for which tasks is gnome-vfs using libxml? any plans on integrating the patches to make gconf depend on dbus too? also, for which tasks is gnome-vfs using libxml?

]]> By: Mikael Hermansson http://blogs.gnome.org/alexl/2006/07/07/continuing-adventures-of-bonobo-and-gnome-vfs/#comment-135 Mikael Hermansson Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/alexl/2006/07/07/continuing-adventures-of-bonobo-and-gnome-vfs/#comment-135 This is great news :-) This is great news :-)

]]> By: Sean Kelley http://blogs.gnome.org/alexl/2006/07/07/continuing-adventures-of-bonobo-and-gnome-vfs/#comment-136 Sean Kelley Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/alexl/2006/07/07/continuing-adventures-of-bonobo-and-gnome-vfs/#comment-136 You are probably already aware of these:<p/><a href="http://developer.imendio.com/wiki/GnomeVFS_D-BUS">http://developer.imendio.com/wiki/GnomeVFS_D-BUS</a><p/><a href="http://developer.imendio.com/wiki/GConf_D-BUS">http://developer.imendio.com/wiki/GConf_D-BUS</a> You are probably already aware of these:

http://developer.imendio.com/wiki/GnomeVFS_D-BUS

http://developer.imendio.com/wiki/GConf_D-BUS

]]> By: d http://blogs.gnome.org/alexl/2006/07/07/continuing-adventures-of-bonobo-and-gnome-vfs/#comment-137 d Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/alexl/2006/07/07/continuing-adventures-of-bonobo-and-gnome-vfs/#comment-137 How about eliminating the dependency on the crypto libraries?<br/>gnome-vfs links to a lot of crypto libraries, which makes <br/>virtually all gnome applications link to them which is <br/>wasteful for a lot of them that have no use for crypto... How about eliminating the dependency on the crypto libraries?
gnome-vfs links to a lot of crypto libraries, which makes
virtually all gnome applications link to them which is
wasteful for a lot of them that have no use for crypto…

]]> By: Anonymous http://blogs.gnome.org/alexl/2006/07/07/continuing-adventures-of-bonobo-and-gnome-vfs/#comment-138 Anonymous Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/alexl/2006/07/07/continuing-adventures-of-bonobo-and-gnome-vfs/#comment-138 Uh, doesn't this break Gnome source compatability? I thought Gnome promised not to do that unless the majoe version number changed. Perhaps GNOME_VFS_INCLUDE_BONOBO should be GNOME_VFS_EXCLUDE_BONOBO nd distributers can turn it off, so drive it down the stack. Uh, doesn’t this break Gnome source compatability? I thought Gnome promised not to do that unless the majoe version number changed. Perhaps GNOME_VFS_INCLUDE_BONOBO should be GNOME_VFS_EXCLUDE_BONOBO nd distributers can turn it off, so drive it down the stack.

]]>