<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bounties and the GIMP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2005/11/28/bounties-and-the-gimp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2005/11/28/bounties-and-the-gimp/</link>
	<description>Dave Neary's view of the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 14:17:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sven Neumann</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2005/11/28/bounties-and-the-gimp/comment-page-1/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Sven Neumann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2005/11/28/bounties-and-the-gimp/#comment-83</guid>
		<description>That is in my opinion a rather poor analysis of what has happened and what situation we are currently in. I rather see it like this:&lt;p/&gt;From the point on that Daniel dissapeared, the bounties have been dead and there was nothing that we could have done about that. Your summary puts it like there would have been an offer on the table all the time. But there wasn&#039;t. There was a deal between Mark and Daniel and that deal had failed. It would have been wrong to assume that there was still a&lt;br/&gt;valid offer at this point. Without clearly defined milestones, there are no bounties.&lt;p/&gt;We are still in the very same position that we have been over the last years. If we think that bounties are a good idea, we just need to make a detailed plan, set up a number of well-defined goals and proclaim bounties. There is money available that we could use for it and we can still approach&lt;br/&gt;Mark or anyone else and ask for financial support. Nothing has changed with respect to that.&lt;br/&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is in my opinion a rather poor analysis of what has happened and what situation we are currently in. I rather see it like this:
<p />From the point on that Daniel dissapeared, the bounties have been dead and there was nothing that we could have done about that. Your summary puts it like there would have been an offer on the table all the time. But there wasn&#8217;t. There was a deal between Mark and Daniel and that deal had failed. It would have been wrong to assume that there was still a<br />valid offer at this point. Without clearly defined milestones, there are no bounties.
<p />We are still in the very same position that we have been over the last years. If we think that bounties are a good idea, we just need to make a detailed plan, set up a number of well-defined goals and proclaim bounties. There is money available that we could use for it and we can still approach<br />Mark or anyone else and ask for financial support. Nothing has changed with respect to that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2005/11/28/bounties-and-the-gimp/feed/ ) in 0.14383 seconds, on Feb 10th, 2012 at 9:25 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 10th, 2012 at 10:25 pm UTC -->
