http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2007/09/28/thanks-for-all-your-comments/ Dave Neary's view of the world Sun, 11 Dec 2011 14:17:21 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2007/09/28/thanks-for-all-your-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-930 Justin Mason Sat, 06 Oct 2007 11:06:13 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2007/09/28/thanks-for-all-your-comments/#comment-930 btw, the presence (or lack) of an SPF record would be irrelevant. the sites sending you these bounces don't bother checking SPF beforehand. btw, the presence (or lack) of an SPF record would be irrelevant. the sites sending you these bounces don’t bother checking SPF beforehand.

]]> http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2007/09/28/thanks-for-all-your-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-929 Justin Mason Sat, 06 Oct 2007 11:05:21 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2007/09/28/thanks-for-all-your-comments/#comment-929 damn, I missed that -- here's how to fix that problem, in case it happens again: http://taint.org/2007/05/30/164456a.html damn, I missed that — here’s how to fix that problem, in case it happens again: http://taint.org/2007/05/30/164456a.html

]]> http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2007/09/28/thanks-for-all-your-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-922 Avery Fri, 28 Sep 2007 15:49:42 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2007/09/28/thanks-for-all-your-comments/#comment-922 Like the guy above said, configure SPF. Also, check out domainkeys. Most spam ends up going to ISP's that actually properly check this stuff, so they should reject any email from your domain that's not getting sent from your server. Like the guy above said, configure SPF. Also, check out domainkeys. Most spam ends up going to ISP’s that actually properly check this stuff, so they should reject any email from your domain that’s not getting sent from your server.

]]> http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2007/09/28/thanks-for-all-your-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-921 nona Fri, 28 Sep 2007 12:23:16 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2007/09/28/thanks-for-all-your-comments/#comment-921 IIRC having no MX is legal according to the email RFCs. MTAs will in that case just try to deliver on your A record for the domain. I think. IIRC having no MX is legal according to the email RFCs. MTAs will in that case just try to deliver on your A record for the domain. I think.

]]> http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2007/09/28/thanks-for-all-your-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-920 Sven Fri, 28 Sep 2007 10:27:47 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2007/09/28/thanks-for-all-your-comments/#comment-920 You should consider setting an SPF Sender Policy text entry in your MX records. If you had done that beforehand, you would probably not have had this problem. You should consider setting an SPF Sender Policy text entry in your MX records. If you had done that beforehand, you would probably not have had this problem.

]]>