Comments on: Call to release team: Open shop on GNOME 3.0 planning! http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2008/10/22/call-to-release-team-open-shop-on-gnome-30-planning/ Dave Neary's view of the world Sun, 11 Dec 2011 14:17:21 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: rawsausage http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2008/10/22/call-to-release-team-open-shop-on-gnome-30-planning/comment-page-1/#comment-1819 rawsausage Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:38:31 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/?p=706#comment-1819 Brainstorm is a good example of argumentum ad populum. It's based on false logic, which is very dangerous. The main reason why those sites exist is venting and building network effects (communities), and how they work as marketing tool. They are not even remotely useful in developing visions. Brainstorm is a good example of argumentum ad populum. It’s based on false logic, which is very dangerous. The main reason why those sites exist is venting and building network effects (communities), and how they work as marketing tool. They are not even remotely useful in developing visions.

]]> By: bkor http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2008/10/22/call-to-release-team-open-shop-on-gnome-30-planning/comment-page-1/#comment-1817 bkor Wed, 22 Oct 2008 21:53:15 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/?p=706#comment-1817 What others said. We've been slacking.. but aside from general guidelines I pretty much like the ideas to come from the community. Giacomo: I don't like 'brainstorm' (the suggestions such a site attracts). For e.g. what is currently being discussed on pgo you need to work with mockups. Test with users, etc. We already have enhancement bugs in Bugzilla and IMO maintainers know the various suggestions for their modules. What others said. We’ve been slacking.. but aside from general guidelines I pretty much like the ideas to come from the community.

Giacomo: I don’t like ‘brainstorm’ (the suggestions such a site attracts). For e.g. what is currently being discussed on pgo you need to work with mockups. Test with users, etc. We already have enhancement bugs in Bugzilla and IMO maintainers know the various suggestions for their modules.

]]> By: Vincent Untz http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2008/10/22/call-to-release-team-open-shop-on-gnome-30-planning/comment-page-1/#comment-1816 Vincent Untz Wed, 22 Oct 2008 19:16:52 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/?p=706#comment-1816 Yep, you're 100% right and I'm happy you're pushing us to move faster :-) Yep, you’re 100% right and I’m happy you’re pushing us to move faster :-)

]]> By: Giacomo Bordiga http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2008/10/22/call-to-release-team-open-shop-on-gnome-30-planning/comment-page-1/#comment-1815 Giacomo Bordiga Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:30:34 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/?p=706#comment-1815 http://brainstorm.gnome.org/ just like http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/ ?? http://brainstorm.gnome.org/ just like http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/ ??

]]> By: Lucas Rocha http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2008/10/22/call-to-release-team-open-shop-on-gnome-30-planning/comment-page-1/#comment-1814 Lucas Rocha Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:23:11 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/?p=706#comment-1814 FYI: We (r-t) will have a meeting this weekend and one of the main topics is the roadmapping process for 3.0. Thanks for the ideas! FYI: We (r-t) will have a meeting this weekend and one of the main topics is the roadmapping process for 3.0. Thanks for the ideas!

]]> By: oliver http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2008/10/22/call-to-release-team-open-shop-on-gnome-30-planning/comment-page-1/#comment-1813 oliver Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:35:22 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/?p=706#comment-1813 "...where every 2 to 3 years we have a major version..." Not sure what the result will be in the end, but I'd like to mention that it would be very nice if latest versions of Gnome apps could still be compiled and run on older Gnome desktops (for example, at work we have RHEL51 at the moment, with Gnome 2.16, and will probably stay with that for another year). I have no idea how the planned release cycle affects this, but wanted to mention this so Gnome devs at least know about this wish :-) “…where every 2 to 3 years we have a major version…”

Not sure what the result will be in the end, but I’d like to mention that it would be very nice if latest versions of Gnome apps could still be compiled and run on older Gnome desktops (for example, at work we have RHEL51 at the moment, with Gnome 2.16, and will probably stay with that for another year). I have no idea how the planned release cycle affects this, but wanted to mention this so Gnome devs at least know about this wish :-)

]]>