<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Too many platforms?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2009/05/20/too-many-platforms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2009/05/20/too-many-platforms/</link>
	<description>Dave Neary's view of the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:22:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Links 21/05/2009: New GNOME, IBM Promotes Desktop GNU/Linux &#124; Boycott Novell</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2009/05/20/too-many-platforms/comment-page-1/#comment-2123</link>
		<dc:creator>Links 21/05/2009: New GNOME, IBM Promotes Desktop GNU/Linux &#124; Boycott Novell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 03:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/?p=925#comment-2123</guid>
		<description>[...] Too many platforms? So where is the massive diversity in mobile platforms? Right now, there is Android in smartphones, LiMo targeting smartphones, Maemo in personal internet tablets and Moblin on netbooks. And except for Android, they are all leveraging the work being done by projects like GNOME, rather than re-inventing the wheel. This is not fragmentation, it is adaptability. It is the basic system being tailored to very specific use-cases by groups who decide to use an existing code base rather than starting from scratch. It is, in a word, what rocks about Linux and free software in general. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Too many platforms? So where is the massive diversity in mobile platforms? Right now, there is Android in smartphones, LiMo targeting smartphones, Maemo in personal internet tablets and Moblin on netbooks. And except for Android, they are all leveraging the work being done by projects like GNOME, rather than re-inventing the wheel. This is not fragmentation, it is adaptability. It is the basic system being tailored to very specific use-cases by groups who decide to use an existing code base rather than starting from scratch. It is, in a word, what rocks about Linux and free software in general. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Neary</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2009/05/20/too-many-platforms/comment-page-1/#comment-2120</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Neary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 08:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/?p=925#comment-2120</guid>
		<description>@Foo: I didn&#039;t - Fabrizio didn&#039;t mention it, so I didn&#039;t. At this stage, it looks like OpenMoko is pretty marginal as an &quot;industry&quot; platform.

@Joseph: No, LiMo isn&#039;t vaporware. It&#039;s a collection of software, some of which (30 to 40 percent) is free software, the rest of which is cross-licenced among LiMo members.

@bratarsch: The difference between FreeSmartphone.org and oFono as I understand it is like the difference between Gstreamer and ALSA. Yes, they can both be used to get the same result, but they&#039;re not at the same level of abstraction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2009/05/20/too-many-platforms/#comment-2118">Foo</a>: I didn&#8217;t &#8211; Fabrizio didn&#8217;t mention it, so I didn&#8217;t. At this stage, it looks like OpenMoko is pretty marginal as an &#8220;industry&#8221; platform.</p>
<p>@Joseph: No, LiMo isn&#8217;t vaporware. It&#8217;s a collection of software, some of which (30 to 40 percent) is free software, the rest of which is cross-licenced among LiMo members.</p>
<p>@bratarsch: The difference between FreeSmartphone.org and oFono as I understand it is like the difference between Gstreamer and ALSA. Yes, they can both be used to get the same result, but they&#8217;re not at the same level of abstraction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2009/05/20/too-many-platforms/comment-page-1/#comment-2119</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 06:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/?p=925#comment-2119</guid>
		<description>You should have put one of the last sentences of your post in bold:

&quot;And except for Android, they are all leveraging the work being done&quot; ... &quot;rather than re-inventing the wheel.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should have put one of the last sentences of your post in bold:</p>
<p>&#8220;And except for Android, they are all leveraging the work being done&#8221; &#8230; &#8220;rather than re-inventing the wheel.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2009/05/20/too-many-platforms/comment-page-1/#comment-2118</link>
		<dc:creator>foo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 05:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/?p=925#comment-2118</guid>
		<description>You forgot about the OpenMoko mobile platforms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You forgot about the OpenMoko mobile platforms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Charpak</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2009/05/20/too-many-platforms/comment-page-1/#comment-2117</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Charpak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 05:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/?p=925#comment-2117</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t LiMo still vaporware at this point? If so, that&#039;s even one fewer in the list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t LiMo still vaporware at this point? If so, that&#8217;s even one fewer in the list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bratarsch</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2009/05/20/too-many-platforms/comment-page-1/#comment-2116</link>
		<dc:creator>bratarsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 00:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/?p=925#comment-2116</guid>
		<description>This is Harald Welte&#039;s take on this:

http://laforge.gnumonks.org/weblog/2009/05/12/#20090512-ophono_fso

So, yes, they actually *are* reinventing the weel here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is Harald Welte&#8217;s take on this:</p>
<p><a href="http://laforge.gnumonks.org/weblog/2009/05/12/#20090512-ophono_fso" rel="nofollow">http://laforge.gnumonks.org/weblog/2009/05/12/#20090512-ophono_fso</a></p>
<p>So, yes, they actually *are* reinventing the weel here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
