<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GNOME Census</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2010/07/28/gnome-census/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2010/07/28/gnome-census/</link>
	<description>Dave Neary's view of the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 14:17:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: idol lips</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2010/07/28/gnome-census/comment-page-2/#comment-3140</link>
		<dc:creator>idol lips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 16:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/?p=1153#comment-3140</guid>
		<description>what is this report for exactly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what is this report for exactly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8216;Ubuntu lift niet mee op werk van anderen&#8217; &#171; Linux Steunpunt Rozenburg ZH eo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2010/07/28/gnome-census/comment-page-2/#comment-3138</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8216;Ubuntu lift niet mee op werk van anderen&#8217; &#171; Linux Steunpunt Rozenburg ZH eo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 09:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/?p=1153#comment-3138</guid>
		<description>[...] in reactie op aantijging van Red Hat-medewerker Greg DeKoenigsberg in juli van dit jaar. Uit de GNOME census die die maand werd gepubliceerd, bleek dat Canonical slechts 1,03% van de code voor GNOME had [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in reactie op aantijging van Red Hat-medewerker Greg DeKoenigsberg in juli van dit jaar. Uit de GNOME census die die maand werd gepubliceerd, bleek dat Canonical slechts 1,03% van de code voor GNOME had [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ACME Challenge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2010/07/28/gnome-census/comment-page-2/#comment-3136</link>
		<dc:creator>ACME Challenge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/?p=1153#comment-3136</guid>
		<description>[...] comments were posted in response to a recently published survey revealing that Canonical &#8212; the commercial arm of Ubuntu &#8212; has contributed only about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] comments were posted in response to a recently published survey revealing that Canonical &#8212; the commercial arm of Ubuntu &#8212; has contributed only about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Founder: Ubuntu&#39;s contribution to Linux goes well beyond the code tree &#124; ZDNet</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2010/07/28/gnome-census/comment-page-2/#comment-3135</link>
		<dc:creator>Founder: Ubuntu&#39;s contribution to Linux goes well beyond the code tree &#124; ZDNet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/?p=1153#comment-3135</guid>
		<description>[...] comments were posted in response to a recently published survey revealing that Canonical &#8212; the commercial arm of Ubuntu &#8212; has contributed only about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] comments were posted in response to a recently published survey revealing that Canonical &#8212; the commercial arm of Ubuntu &#8212; has contributed only about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: X Census (for 1.9) &#171; Tiago Vignatti</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2010/07/28/gnome-census/comment-page-2/#comment-3125</link>
		<dc:creator>X Census (for 1.9) &#171; Tiago Vignatti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 16:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/?p=1153#comment-3125</guid>
		<description>[...] Census (for&#160;1.9) By vignatti  Topic&#8217;s name is a funny (and friendly) devotion to GNOME Census. So let&#8217;s take a look at some numbers from the time Xorg 1.9 was in development &#8211; raw [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Census (for&nbsp;1.9) By vignatti  Topic&#8217;s name is a funny (and friendly) devotion to GNOME Census. So let&#8217;s take a look at some numbers from the time Xorg 1.9 was in development &#8211; raw [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GNOME Census is out, reveals Canonical commit 16x less than Red Hat, shit hits the fan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2010/07/28/gnome-census/comment-page-2/#comment-3124</link>
		<dc:creator>GNOME Census is out, reveals Canonical commit 16x less than Red Hat, shit hits the fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 07:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/?p=1153#comment-3124</guid>
		<description>[...] Neary has posted the results of the GNOME census which has been looking at contributions to GNOME, who develops what, where it&#8217;s coming from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Neary has posted the results of the GNOME census which has been looking at contributions to GNOME, who develops what, where it&#8217;s coming from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Особое программирование &#187; Post Topic &#187; Реакция Canonical на исследование вклада компаний в проект GNOME</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2010/07/28/gnome-census/comment-page-2/#comment-3115</link>
		<dc:creator>Особое программирование &#187; Post Topic &#187; Реакция Canonical на исследование вклада компаний в проект GNOME</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 18:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/?p=1153#comment-3115</guid>
		<description>[...] адрес компании Canonical. Дело в том, что недавно проект GNOME опубликовал отчёт о вкладе компаний в проект GNOME. Как оказалась, вклад [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] адрес компании Canonical. Дело в том, что недавно проект GNOME опубликовал отчёт о вкладе компаний в проект GNOME. Как оказалась, вклад [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ubuntu Empire Strikes Back &#124; @tuxguru</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2010/07/28/gnome-census/comment-page-2/#comment-3107</link>
		<dc:creator>Ubuntu Empire Strikes Back &#124; @tuxguru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 13:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/?p=1153#comment-3107</guid>
		<description>[...] doesn&#8217;t contribute back&#8221; argument cropped up again when Dave Neary released a report of the talk he gave at GUADEC on the contributions made to the GNOME desktop environment. He found [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] doesn&#8217;t contribute back&#8221; argument cropped up again when Dave Neary released a report of the talk he gave at GUADEC on the contributions made to the GNOME desktop environment. He found [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GNOME and the long tail of the commons &#124; apogee</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2010/07/28/gnome-census/comment-page-2/#comment-3105</link>
		<dc:creator>GNOME and the long tail of the commons &#124; apogee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 12:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/?p=1153#comment-3105</guid>
		<description>[...] as important in building the commons and its market as what’s up-front. You can see this in the GNOME Census, recently completed by Dave Neary of Neary Consulting. Red Hat is by far the largest contributor, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as important in building the commons and its market as what’s up-front. You can see this in the GNOME Census, recently completed by Dave Neary of Neary Consulting. Red Hat is by far the largest contributor, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Biweekly Links &#8211; 08-06-2010 &#171; God, Your Book Is Great !!</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2010/07/28/gnome-census/comment-page-2/#comment-3103</link>
		<dc:creator>Biweekly Links &#8211; 08-06-2010 &#171; God, Your Book Is Great !!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 20:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/?p=1153#comment-3103</guid>
		<description>[...] GNOME Census This article caused a huge commotion in the GNOME community especially with respect to Canonical. I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] GNOME Census This article caused a huge commotion in the GNOME community especially with respect to Canonical. I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2010/07/28/gnome-census/feed/ ) in 0.18505 seconds, on Feb 10th, 2012 at 8:40 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 10th, 2012 at 9:40 pm UTC -->
