<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cody Russell &#187; General</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/bratsche/category/general/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/bratsche</link>
	<description>too much information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:52:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Nokia N900</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/bratsche/2009/08/28/nokia-n900/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.gnome.org/bratsche/2009/08/28/nokia-n900/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bratsche</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/bratsche/?p=509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I feel like the only person who isn&#8217;t so excited by the N900. It looks like a beautiful device, and it&#8217;s built on the current Maemo platform that I&#8217;ve always liked and there&#8217;s so much to be excited about. But I&#8217;m not.
I feel like we&#8217;ve been wanting Nokia to make this device since Maemo was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel like the only person who isn&#8217;t so excited by the <a href="http://maemo.nokia.com/n900/">N900</a>. It looks like a beautiful device, and it&#8217;s built on the current Maemo platform that I&#8217;ve always liked and there&#8217;s so much to be excited about. But I&#8217;m not.</p>
<p>I feel like we&#8217;ve been wanting Nokia to make this device since Maemo was first released. They released <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nokia_770_Internet_Tablet">an Internet tablet</a>, and I figured maybe it&#8217;s just to get the platform out the door. Fine. But then they release <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nokia_N800">another Internet tablet</a>, and then <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nokia_N810">another</a>. They were cool devices, but I had no use for them. I just never wanted to carry around <em>yet another</em> device.</p>
<p>So now they release what I&#8217;ve been wanting for all this time, but on <a href="http://maemo.nokia.com/">a platform</a> that they&#8217;ve <a href="http://www.osnews.com/story/21779">already declared is a dead end</a>. Am I missing something, or does this feel very pointless?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not trying to start any discussion about the toolkits, that&#8217;s not at all the point. It&#8217;s just confusing that they would never make a useful device that anyone really cares about until after they&#8217;ve declared an end to the platform. Now that they have a device I want to buy, there&#8217;s no point in buying it since it appears to has no future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.gnome.org/bratsche/2009/08/28/nokia-n900/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ECMA C# standards community promise</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/bratsche/2009/07/06/ecma-c-standards-community-promise/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.gnome.org/bratsche/2009/07/06/ecma-c-standards-community-promise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bratsche</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/bratsche/?p=505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Only a few days ago Richard Stallman was speaking here at the Gran Canaria Desktop Summit and the subject of Mono inevitably came up.  There was heated debate between Richard and others in the community.  His position seemed to be that Mono was an important tool for migrating foreign software to a free [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only a few days ago Richard Stallman was speaking here at the Gran Canaria Desktop Summit and the subject of Mono inevitably came up.  There was heated debate between Richard and others in the community.  His position seemed to be that Mono was an important tool for migrating foreign software to a free platform, but it should be discouraged for use in developing new free software, regardless of technical advantages, because he was unconvinced that we would be allowed to continue using it (that Microsoft would sue us and require us to stop using it, etc).</p>
<p>I had the opportunity to ask him a question about this, which was something roughly like, &#8220;Is there anything Microsoft could do or say that would resolve some of the uncertainty around this issue?&#8221;  I was very happy that Richard&#8217;s response was &#8220;yes&#8221;, and he went on to say how Microsoft could be more clear in their position of allowing free implementations of C#.</p>
<p>Interestingly, <a href="http://port25.technet.com/archive/2009/07/06/the-ecma-c-and-cli-standards.aspx">news regarding the C# standards were released today</a> that will hopefully clear up things for people who were not convinced before.  Undoubtedly there will be haters who continue to hate, but I really will be interested to see what Richard&#8217;s position will be after this (not that his position will affect mine, but I&#8217;m still curious).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.gnome.org/bratsche/2009/07/06/ecma-c-standards-community-promise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moving history between git repos</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/bratsche/2009/04/03/moving-history-between-git-repos/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.gnome.org/bratsche/2009/04/03/moving-history-between-git-repos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 19:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bratsche</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/bratsche/?p=501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So GLib and GTK+ have officially moved from svn to git this week.  I had been doing some work in my own git repos, but they were based on various git-svn checkouts and they were all hashed differently, so it wasn&#8217;t possible to just merge from one of them into the new official git [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So GLib and GTK+ have officially moved from svn to git this week.  I had been doing some work in my own git repos, but they were based on various git-svn checkouts and they were all hashed differently, so it wasn&#8217;t possible to just merge from one of them into the new official git repos.</p>
<p>It turns out that it&#8217;s quite easy to merge your history over, though.  Here&#8217;s what I did.</p>
<p>Say there is an old git repo with a branch called new-awesome-stuff.  You want to create a branch in the new git repo with the same name, and merge the history over.</p>
<p>(in the old repo)<br />
<code><br />
git checkout new-awesome-stuff<br />
git format-patch master<br />
</code></p>
<p>This generates patches for each revision.. say there were 34 revisions in this branch.  You&#8217;ll get 34 patch files whose names begin with 00nn (where nn is 01..34).</p>
<p>(in the new repo)<br />
<code><br />
git checkout -b new-awesome-stuff<br />
git am 00*.patch<br />
</code></p>
<p>If you&#8217;re putting things on github as I am, this should help you maintain your work in a single repo instead of having four different repos for the same project as I had. <img src='http://blogs.gnome.org/bratsche/wp-content/mu-plugins/tango-smilies/tango/face-smile.png' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.gnome.org/bratsche/2009/04/03/moving-history-between-git-repos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vote for Susie!</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/bratsche/2009/02/04/vote-for-susie/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.gnome.org/bratsche/2009/02/04/vote-for-susie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 21:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bratsche</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/bratsche/?p=489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Billboard Magazine is running some kind of photography contest, and there is a photo of my friend Susie that&#8217;s entered in the contest by photographer Angela Morris.  However, I voted for it yesterday and at the time it had very few votes.. I read today a comment by one of her Facebook friends saying [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Billboard Magazine is running some kind of photography contest, and there is a <a href="http://www.billboardphotocontest.com/bin/Rate?image_id=1006100797">photo of my friend Susie that&#8217;s entered in the contest</a> by photographer <a href="http://www.angelaphotography.com/">Angela Morris</a>.  However, I voted for it yesterday and at the time it had very few votes.. I read today a comment by one of her Facebook friends saying she had like 430 votes.  So I went and looked at the contest page and it said she had like 21 votes or something.</p>
<p>WTF.</p>
<p>She has at least 60 people in her &#8220;vote for Susie&#8221; Facebook group, so it seems likely that even if her friend who said she had 430 votes was wrong, she must have at <em>least</em> 60 votes by now.  I call vote fraud on Billboard Magazine&#8217;s contest!  Maybe they discriminate against violinists or something.</p>
<p><img src="http://blogs.gnome.org/bratsche/files/2009/02/susie.jpg" alt="Vote for Susie" width="251" height="320" class="size-full wp-image-490" /></p>
<p>Let&#8217;s fight this horrible injustice!   Everyone go <a href="http://www.billboardphotocontest.com/bin/Rate?image_id=1006100797">vote for Susie</a>!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.gnome.org/bratsche/2009/02/04/vote-for-susie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Project Ridle^H^H^H^H^HGiggity!</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/bratsche/2008/12/19/project-ridlehhhhhgiggity/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.gnome.org/bratsche/2008/12/19/project-ridlehhhhhgiggity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 18:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bratsche</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/bratsche/?p=483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s been some interest in getting some of the features from Christian Hammond&#8217;s awesome libsexy merged into GTK+, and I&#8217;m happy to report that some progress is finally being made on this.  I just committed support for icons in entries into GTK+ a few minutes ago, and this will be available in GTK+ 2.16. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s been some interest in getting some of the features from Christian Hammond&#8217;s awesome <a href="http://www.chipx86.com/w/index.php/Libsexy">libsexy</a> merged into GTK+, and I&#8217;m happy to report that some progress is finally being made on this.  I just committed <a href="http://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?query=85292">support for icons in entries</a> into GTK+ a few minutes ago, and this will be available in GTK+ 2.16.  This is based on SexyIconEntry, but supports some additional cool features that weren&#8217;t in SexyIconEntry.  Some new things:</p>
<ul>
<li>Set icons from pixbufs, stock items, GIcons, and icon names</li>
<li>Control sensitivity of each icon</li>
<li>Tooltips on icons</li>
<li>Drag and drop with icons</li>
</ul>
<p>It&#8217;s also more memory efficient now, allocating the data and subwindows on demand.  This is important since the new feature has been merged into GtkEntry itself rather than providing a new widget, and would more than double the size of every GtkEntry otherwise.</p>
<p>Thanks to everyone who helped: Matthias Clasen (tooltips, drag/drop support, patch review), Emanuele Bassi (review), Ross Burton (review), Christian Dywan (review, testing in Midori browser), and of course to Christian Hammond for making SexyIconEntry!</p>
<p><a href="http://live.gnome.org/ProjectRidley">Project Ridley</a> doesn&#8217;t explicitly mention libsexy, so I hereby create a new project specifically for merging libsexy features: Project Giggity!</p>
<p>Next I want to finish working on URL labels, like SexyUrlLabel.</p>
<div id="attachment_484" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 221px"><a href="http://blogs.gnome.org/bratsche/files/2008/12/giggity.jpg"><img src="http://blogs.gnome.org/bratsche/files/2008/12/giggity-211x300.jpg" alt="Project Giggity" title="giggity" width="211" height="300" class="size-medium wp-image-484" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Project Giggity</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.gnome.org/bratsche/2008/12/19/project-ridlehhhhhgiggity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gtk# 2.12.3 Win32 installer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/bratsche/2008/10/02/gtk-2123-win32-installer/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.gnome.org/bratsche/2008/10/02/gtk-2123-win32-installer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 21:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bratsche</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gtk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[installer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/bratsche/?p=478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s been a lot of talk on the Gtk# mailing lists about the lack of a 2.12 installer for Win32.  I finally took the time to roll a new MSI installer for Gtk# 2.12.3.  But Medsphere is not using Gtk# 2.12, and we&#8217;re not planning to use it any time soon so I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s been a lot of talk on the Gtk# mailing lists about the lack of a 2.12 installer for Win32.  I finally took the time to roll a <a href="http://bzr.medsphere.com/~cody/installers/">new MSI installer for Gtk# 2.12.3</a>.  But Medsphere is not using Gtk# 2.12, and we&#8217;re not planning to use it any time soon so I don&#8217;t think we really want to provide support for 2.12, or for 2.14 once it comes out, until we&#8217;re actually using them.</p>
<p>My long-term plan has been that I want to get gtk.org distributing its own official msi/msm installers for each component of the stack.  Then other projects, such as gtk# or any gtk+ app, could consume the msm installers for their own msi containers.</p>
<p>Boston Summit is coming up pretty soon, and Brad and I plan to take the opportunity there to try to get Medsphere&#8217;s installer code into shape to do this and then push it into an upstream svn module, probably on Gnome&#8217;s svn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.gnome.org/bratsche/2008/10/02/gtk-2123-win32-installer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vista.  You know, the other one.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/bratsche/2008/09/25/vista-you-know-the-other-one/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.gnome.org/bratsche/2008/09/25/vista-you-know-the-other-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 04:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bratsche</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medsphere]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/bratsche/?p=476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Linux Journal has an article entitled The *Other* Vista: Successful and Open Source.  It&#8217;s a brief introduction to the VistA system that is used by the VA and now many private hospitals, and which is the basis for Medsphere&#8217;s current products.  The article talks a bit about Medsphere&#8217;s open source GTK-based OpenVista CIS, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.linuxjournal.com/">Linux Journal</a> has an article entitled <a href="http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/other-vista-successful-and-open-source">The *Other* Vista: Successful and Open Source</a>.  It&#8217;s a brief introduction to the VistA system that is used by the VA and now many private hospitals, and which is the basis for Medsphere&#8217;s current products.  The article talks a bit about Medsphere&#8217;s open source GTK-based OpenVista CIS, the new <a href="http://www.medsphere.org/">Medsphere.org</a> initiative, and Congressman Pete Stark&#8217;s proposed <a href="http://www.house.gov/stark/news/110th/legislation/200809-HIT/billtext.pdf">Health-e Information Technology Act of 2008</a> bill that would advance open source medical software in the US if it were passed.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s really cool to see that our work is being noticed, and that people are starting to think about how open source can affect the medical industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.gnome.org/bratsche/2008/09/25/vista-you-know-the-other-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ding Dong, the Witch Is Dead!</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/bratsche/2008/08/01/ding-dong-the-witch-is-dead/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.gnome.org/bratsche/2008/08/01/ding-dong-the-witch-is-dead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 03:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bratsche</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/bratsche/2008/08/01/ding-dong-the-witch-is-dead/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seven years, 157 comments later.. IT IS DONE!

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seven years, 157 comments later.. <a href="http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56070">IT IS DONE</a>!</p>
<p><img src='http://blogs.gnome.org/bratsche/files/2008/08/witch.jpg' alt='Witch' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.gnome.org/bratsche/2008/08/01/ding-dong-the-witch-is-dead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What was missing at Guadec?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/bratsche/2008/07/12/what-was-missing-at-guadec/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.gnome.org/bratsche/2008/07/12/what-was-missing-at-guadec/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 20:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bratsche</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/bratsche/2008/07/12/what-was-missing-at-guadec/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wasn&#8217;t even there and I can answer that question.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#8217;t even there and I can answer that question.</p>
<p><img src='http://blogs.gnome.org/bratsche/files/2008/07/tabfamily.jpg' alt='The answer to Guadec insanity' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.gnome.org/bratsche/2008/07/12/what-was-missing-at-guadec/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Raconteurs</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/bratsche/2008/05/02/the-raconteurs/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.gnome.org/bratsche/2008/05/02/the-raconteurs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 15:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bratsche</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/bratsche/2008/05/02/the-raconteurs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Megan and I went to the House of Blues in Dallas last night for the Raconteurs concert there.  It was really awesome!  Birds of Avalon opened for them.  I had never heard of them before, but I thought they were okay.  They had a funny gimmick where they have these little [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Megan and I went to the House of Blues in Dallas last night for the Raconteurs concert there.  It was really awesome!  Birds of Avalon opened for them.  I had never heard of them before, but I thought they were okay.  They had a funny gimmick where they have these little plastic birds, that I guess are battery powered since their wings could flap quickly, and the lead singer would turn them on and throw them out into the audience during one of the big instrumental sections of one song near the end.  The Raconteurs came out later and it was the best show.. they did some stuff from their first album, and the new album, and a few songs that they have never recorded yet.  Lots of fun.  And House of Blues is a cool place, except that they charge you $5 for a <em>can</em> of beer.</p>
<p><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2282/2458853699_bf98629804.jpg" alt="Raconteurs poster" /></p>
<p>I picked up a concert poster for it while I was there, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.gnome.org/bratsche/2008/05/02/the-raconteurs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
