<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HIG Facelift</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/calum/2005/11/17/hig-facelift/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/calum/2005/11/17/hig-facelift/</link>
	<description>Usability an' that</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: GrumZ</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/calum/2005/11/17/hig-facelift/comment-page-1/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>GrumZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/calum/2005/11/17/hig-facelift/#comment-119</guid>
		<description>Nice works ! Thanks.&lt;p/&gt;About the rewriting of the HIG, I would like to say that I agree with you that it could be great if the HIG has a task oriented section that gathers all the guidelines for a kind of layout. &lt;br/&gt;IMHO, the detailed section should stay if anybody wants more details and could be linked from the task oriented sections for example.&lt;p/&gt;What could be very useful for developers would be some HIG compliant widgets/layouts in Glade so that gnome/gtk apps could be a minimum HIG compliant even of the developper doesn&#039;t have time to comply with the HIG or simply doesn&#039;t know about it.&lt;p/&gt;Personally, as a developper, what I used to appreciate in the HIG is the technical sections giving the Glade parameters needed to have a compliant layout.&lt;p/&gt;It was my two cents worth...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice works ! Thanks.
<p />About the rewriting of the HIG, I would like to say that I agree with you that it could be great if the HIG has a task oriented section that gathers all the guidelines for a kind of layout. <br />IMHO, the detailed section should stay if anybody wants more details and could be linked from the task oriented sections for example.
<p />What could be very useful for developers would be some HIG compliant widgets/layouts in Glade so that gnome/gtk apps could be a minimum HIG compliant even of the developper doesn&#8217;t have time to comply with the HIG or simply doesn&#8217;t know about it.
<p />Personally, as a developper, what I used to appreciate in the HIG is the technical sections giving the Glade parameters needed to have a compliant layout.
<p />It was my two cents worth&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ldng</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/calum/2005/11/17/hig-facelift/comment-page-1/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>ldng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/calum/2005/11/17/hig-facelift/#comment-120</guid>
		<description>Great work ! It&#039;s way easy to read on screen with this new stylesheet !&lt;p/&gt;Having small guides by type of UI would be great. Maybe both can co-exists as severals quick guide and one master reference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great work ! It&#8217;s way easy to read on screen with this new stylesheet !
<p />Having small guides by type of UI would be great. Maybe both can co-exists as severals quick guide and one master reference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
