<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Disruption</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/calum/2006/04/25/disruption/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/calum/2006/04/25/disruption/</link>
	<description>Usability an' that</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: m</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/calum/2006/04/25/disruption/comment-page-1/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/calum/2006/04/25/disruption/#comment-167</guid>
		<description>Well, it is possible to be innovative in this area, witness&lt;br/&gt;Apple&#039;s Pages and their word processing application (can&#039;t remember the name now).&lt;br/&gt;But honestly, StarOffice probably does not have the manpower &lt;br/&gt;needed to be innovative...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it is possible to be innovative in this area, witness<br />Apple&#8217;s Pages and their word processing application (can&#8217;t remember the name now).<br />But honestly, StarOffice probably does not have the manpower <br />needed to be innovative&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giovanni Corriga</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/calum/2006/04/25/disruption/comment-page-1/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>Giovanni Corriga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/calum/2006/04/25/disruption/#comment-168</guid>
		<description>Then why not start a Firefox-like system, mixing OO.org&#039;s components in a lighter app?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then why not start a Firefox-like system, mixing OO.org&#8217;s components in a lighter app?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/calum/2006/04/25/disruption/comment-page-1/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/calum/2006/04/25/disruption/#comment-169</guid>
		<description>The opposite of &quot;complicated&quot; is not &quot;featureless&quot;; it&#039;s &quot;simple&quot;.  IME as a user interface designer, when you make something simpler, people are *delighted*.&lt;p/&gt;Besides, Firefox showed that a core+extensions architecture can work quite well.  Why isn&#039;t OOo modular like this, too?  Customer Y can download extension X =&gt; everybody is happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The opposite of &#8220;complicated&#8221; is not &#8220;featureless&#8221;; it&#8217;s &#8220;simple&#8221;.  IME as a user interface designer, when you make something simpler, people are *delighted*.
<p />Besides, Firefox showed that a core+extensions architecture can work quite well.  Why isn&#8217;t OOo modular like this, too?  Customer Y can download extension X =&gt; everybody is happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
