<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sun&#8217;s Web App UI Guidelines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/calum/2007/10/15/suns-web-app-ui-guidelines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/calum/2007/10/15/suns-web-app-ui-guidelines/</link>
	<description>Usability an' that</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:14:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ken</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/calum/2007/10/15/suns-web-app-ui-guidelines/comment-page-1/#comment-341</link>
		<dc:creator>ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 22:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/calum/2007/10/15/suns-web-app-ui-guidelines/#comment-341</guid>
		<description>No, I have no problem with Swing&#039;s API or performance.  But try opening the Java Web Start Application Manager and then telling me with a straight face that Sun has something to say about usability.

Yes, I used to file detailed bug reports with Sun, but after being ignored for years, I gave up.  Empirically, Sun&#039;s own bug-tracking system is also a place for &quot;lamely bitching about [bugs] where nobody&#039;s going to take any notice of them&quot;.

But if it wasn&#039;t those people again, then maybe it&#039;ll be useful.  I&#039;m not going to hold my breath, though, based on their recent history.  &quot;Three-Level Tabbed Panes&quot;?  Just, wow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I have no problem with Swing&#8217;s API or performance.  But try opening the Java Web Start Application Manager and then telling me with a straight face that Sun has something to say about usability.</p>
<p>Yes, I used to file detailed bug reports with Sun, but after being ignored for years, I gave up.  Empirically, Sun&#8217;s own bug-tracking system is also a place for &#8220;lamely bitching about [bugs] where nobody&#8217;s going to take any notice of them&#8221;.</p>
<p>But if it wasn&#8217;t those people again, then maybe it&#8217;ll be useful.  I&#8217;m not going to hold my breath, though, based on their recent history.  &#8220;Three-Level Tabbed Panes&#8221;?  Just, wow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: calum</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/calum/2007/10/15/suns-web-app-ui-guidelines/comment-page-1/#comment-340</link>
		<dc:creator>calum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/calum/2007/10/15/suns-web-app-ui-guidelines/#comment-340</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t say I recall any notable changes to the look and feel of Swing in the past couple of years, and specc&#039;ing and usability testing those would be the only thing that Sun&#039;s Java UI folks would have worked on,  If you have problems with Swing&#039;s API or performance, or there are bugs in Swing&#039;s implementation, then tragically your complaints are misdirected.  I&#039;m sure you&#039;ve filed comprehensive reports about any such problems you may have encountered rather than just lamely bitching about them where nobody&#039;s going to take any notice of them, though, so that&#039;s fine.

Oh, and no, it wasn&#039;t them anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t say I recall any notable changes to the look and feel of Swing in the past couple of years, and specc&#8217;ing and usability testing those would be the only thing that Sun&#8217;s Java UI folks would have worked on,  If you have problems with Swing&#8217;s API or performance, or there are bugs in Swing&#8217;s implementation, then tragically your complaints are misdirected.  I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ve filed comprehensive reports about any such problems you may have encountered rather than just lamely bitching about them where nobody&#8217;s going to take any notice of them, though, so that&#8217;s fine.</p>
<p>Oh, and no, it wasn&#8217;t them anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ken</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/calum/2007/10/15/suns-web-app-ui-guidelines/comment-page-1/#comment-339</link>
		<dc:creator>ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/calum/2007/10/15/suns-web-app-ui-guidelines/#comment-339</guid>
		<description>Are these the same Sun &quot;user interface specialists&quot; who worked on all the Java UI crap they gave us just a couple years ago?

Gee, that sounds so tempting, Sun, but I think the hobos outside my window are presenting a more compelling business case.  Maybe next millennium, mmm&#039;kay?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are these the same Sun &#8220;user interface specialists&#8221; who worked on all the Java UI crap they gave us just a couple years ago?</p>
<p>Gee, that sounds so tempting, Sun, but I think the hobos outside my window are presenting a more compelling business case.  Maybe next millennium, mmm&#8217;kay?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  blogs.gnome.org/calum/2007/10/15/suns-web-app-ui-guidelines/feed/ ) in 1.17238 seconds, on Feb 10th, 2012 at 11:16 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 11th, 2012 at 12:16 am UTC -->
