<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Calum's Wee GNOME Blog</title>
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/calum</link>
	<description>Usability an' that</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 02:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Rockstars and decadence by Lucas Rocha &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Notes on the Future of GNOME: Problems and Questions</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/calum/2008/06/07/rockstars-and-decadence/#comment-454</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucas Rocha &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Notes on the Future of GNOME: Problems and Questions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 17:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.gnome.org/calum/2008/06/07/rockstars-and-decadence/#comment-454</guid>
		<description>[...] project. They overlap in many ways with the opinion of some people who have already commented on the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] project. They overlap in many ways with the opinion of some people who have already commented on the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rockstars and decadence by The way the GNOME desktop should go &#124; Mirsal Ennaime</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/calum/2008/06/07/rockstars-and-decadence/#comment-452</link>
		<dc:creator>The way the GNOME desktop should go &#124; Mirsal Ennaime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 02:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.gnome.org/calum/2008/06/07/rockstars-and-decadence/#comment-452</guid>
		<description>[...] start a huge community wide effort to discuss the future of GNOME is really amazing. following Calum Benson Christian Schaller Lucas Rocha Jono Bacon Richard Huges and the other, I&#8217;ll post my little [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] start a huge community wide effort to discuss the future of GNOME is really amazing. following Calum Benson Christian Schaller Lucas Rocha Jono Bacon Richard Huges and the other, I&#8217;ll post my little [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rockstars and decadence by Decadence of the Enterprise Desktop</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/calum/2008/06/07/rockstars-and-decadence/#comment-451</link>
		<dc:creator>Decadence of the Enterprise Desktop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 23:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.gnome.org/calum/2008/06/07/rockstars-and-decadence/#comment-451</guid>
		<description>[...] Calum Benson - Tends to agree with Andy. While Clutter is cool it will not solve our problem with &#8220;vague lack of coherence and integration on some parts of our desktop&#8221;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Calum Benson - Tends to agree with Andy. While Clutter is cool it will not solve our problem with &#8220;vague lack of coherence and integration on some parts of our desktop&#8221;. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rockstars and decadence by mao</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/calum/2008/06/07/rockstars-and-decadence/#comment-450</link>
		<dc:creator>mao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 15:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.gnome.org/calum/2008/06/07/rockstars-and-decadence/#comment-450</guid>
		<description>GNOME is GTK+/C - very high learning curve, difficult to develop on it, you lose time for very easy tasks, while you could spend it for something better - hey, don't say there are wrappers...they SUCK, and there's quite NO documentation..

KDE is QT/C++ - professional development environment, easy learning curve - but the DE atm, sucks.. (too many options, and Ks :))

hello there, can we in 2008 use _technologies_?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GNOME is GTK+/C - very high learning curve, difficult to develop on it, you lose time for very easy tasks, while you could spend it for something better - hey, don&#8217;t say there are wrappers&#8230;they SUCK, and there&#8217;s quite NO documentation..</p>
<p>KDE is QT/C++ - professional development environment, easy learning curve - but the DE atm, sucks.. (too many options, and Ks :))</p>
<p>hello there, can we in 2008 use _technologies_?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rockstars and decadence by troll</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/calum/2008/06/07/rockstars-and-decadence/#comment-449</link>
		<dc:creator>troll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 14:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.gnome.org/calum/2008/06/07/rockstars-and-decadence/#comment-449</guid>
		<description>One more example off the top of my head. Consider having a presentation made. Now, you're in that big hall and it's your turn. Desktop search for your document. Ask the presentation to start. No starting of OOo, nonononono!

Most of the places have wireless networked projectors nowadays already. Something that is entirely unsupported in Linux. But what if you could just say "I want to present this", and as the one projector was networked, and uPNP and the other fancy technologies worked, it would be presented. Not via normal OOo, but via that new fancy presentation interface that we saw a while ago - showing the presenter the notes and lines to speak while sending the slide automatically to the projector without the rest.

Now, often there are teams where some people are remote. You'd be presenting to many people in the same room but some would be remote. How about adding feed to them into the picture. Voila, telepathy again unbeknownst to the user starts up some sort of broadcasting system and asks for people to join the channel (or some similar method, the logics can differ a lot) if they have not offered to join earlier. Voila, they get the slides and join the meeting via voip etc.

All in 2-3 extra clicks. Small things that make users really really love the platform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more example off the top of my head. Consider having a presentation made. Now, you&#8217;re in that big hall and it&#8217;s your turn. Desktop search for your document. Ask the presentation to start. No starting of OOo, nonononono!</p>
<p>Most of the places have wireless networked projectors nowadays already. Something that is entirely unsupported in Linux. But what if you could just say &#8220;I want to present this&#8221;, and as the one projector was networked, and uPNP and the other fancy technologies worked, it would be presented. Not via normal OOo, but via that new fancy presentation interface that we saw a while ago - showing the presenter the notes and lines to speak while sending the slide automatically to the projector without the rest.</p>
<p>Now, often there are teams where some people are remote. You&#8217;d be presenting to many people in the same room but some would be remote. How about adding feed to them into the picture. Voila, telepathy again unbeknownst to the user starts up some sort of broadcasting system and asks for people to join the channel (or some similar method, the logics can differ a lot) if they have not offered to join earlier. Voila, they get the slides and join the meeting via voip etc.</p>
<p>All in 2-3 extra clicks. Small things that make users really really love the platform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rockstars and decadence by troll</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/calum/2008/06/07/rockstars-and-decadence/#comment-448</link>
		<dc:creator>troll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 14:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.gnome.org/calum/2008/06/07/rockstars-and-decadence/#comment-448</guid>
		<description>Telepathy could be that next great innovation. Not just because it allows to do the same things again (voip, irc, msn, aim, etc) but because it allows to be more transparent. There does not have to be distinct application, or the activities bound to just one. You can with some work for instance add file sharing telepathy plugin into all gnome applications, something akin to gvfs. The difference is not technical, it is major however in usability terms. Fluency, transparency. 

I could see things like scheduling (free times from calendars, meeting rooms), IM chatting, email, collaborative document authoring, voip, document management systems integration, collaborative bookmarking, blogging, etc melting together into the point where you can point at any target anywhere and just tell via a set of pluggable 'verbs' what you want to do and things would just simply happen... That is something *NO* platform has nowadays, and as the network effects and #1 use of computers is communicating, it would enhance that beyond anything we have ever seen. It would be a major selling point, even forcing the others to adapt or die.

The sad thing is, most of the Gnome developers just are absolutely clueless about marketing, usability, and having any sort of visions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Telepathy could be that next great innovation. Not just because it allows to do the same things again (voip, irc, msn, aim, etc) but because it allows to be more transparent. There does not have to be distinct application, or the activities bound to just one. You can with some work for instance add file sharing telepathy plugin into all gnome applications, something akin to gvfs. The difference is not technical, it is major however in usability terms. Fluency, transparency. </p>
<p>I could see things like scheduling (free times from calendars, meeting rooms), IM chatting, email, collaborative document authoring, voip, document management systems integration, collaborative bookmarking, blogging, etc melting together into the point where you can point at any target anywhere and just tell via a set of pluggable &#8216;verbs&#8217; what you want to do and things would just simply happen&#8230; That is something *NO* platform has nowadays, and as the network effects and #1 use of computers is communicating, it would enhance that beyond anything we have ever seen. It would be a major selling point, even forcing the others to adapt or die.</p>
<p>The sad thing is, most of the Gnome developers just are absolutely clueless about marketing, usability, and having any sort of visions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rockstars and decadence by GNOME in decadenza&#8230; « pollycoke :)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/calum/2008/06/07/rockstars-and-decadence/#comment-447</link>
		<dc:creator>GNOME in decadenza&#8230; « pollycoke :)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 13:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.gnome.org/calum/2008/06/07/rockstars-and-decadence/#comment-447</guid>
		<description>[...] Questo articolo sta avendo una grossa eco nella blogosfera. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Questo articolo sta avendo una grossa eco nella blogosfera. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rockstars and decadence by Philip Withnall</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/calum/2008/06/07/rockstars-and-decadence/#comment-446</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Withnall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 12:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.gnome.org/calum/2008/06/07/rockstars-and-decadence/#comment-446</guid>
		<description>I rather think we are innovating with things like Soylent and Conduit; if we can get them nicely integrated throughout the desktop, we'll be ahead of the game.

That said, I haven't used Windows or OS X for a while, so I may be wrong and they may have had such functionality for years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I rather think we are innovating with things like Soylent and Conduit; if we can get them nicely integrated throughout the desktop, we&#8217;ll be ahead of the game.</p>
<p>That said, I haven&#8217;t used Windows or OS X for a while, so I may be wrong and they may have had such functionality for years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rockstars and decadence by Thales</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/calum/2008/06/07/rockstars-and-decadence/#comment-445</link>
		<dc:creator>Thales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 21:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.gnome.org/calum/2008/06/07/rockstars-and-decadence/#comment-445</guid>
		<description>Linux now has an excellent chance to reunite forces and promote the best desktop ever. Today the QT libraries is in better state that the GTK ones, maybe that sign that on the long path we should abandon multiples libraries, and stop doing duplicated jobs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Linux now has an excellent chance to reunite forces and promote the best desktop ever. Today the QT libraries is in better state that the GTK ones, maybe that sign that on the long path we should abandon multiples libraries, and stop doing duplicated jobs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rockstars and decadence by Mike</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/calum/2008/06/07/rockstars-and-decadence/#comment-444</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 19:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.gnome.org/calum/2008/06/07/rockstars-and-decadence/#comment-444</guid>
		<description>exactly calum, integration allows you to spend more time doing what you were trying to do rather than fiddling trying to make your computer do what you want. Thus spending less time on it and more time living...

the "flash" that people want is generally about making the UI consistent with our interactions with the real world because those interactions are more intuitive to the human mind. (ex: minimizing windows in OSX visually takes you to the place in the bar as if it were a real object being stored temporarily)
Thus bringing us back to point #1, less time worrying about using something correctly and more time living.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>exactly calum, integration allows you to spend more time doing what you were trying to do rather than fiddling trying to make your computer do what you want. Thus spending less time on it and more time living&#8230;</p>
<p>the &#8220;flash&#8221; that people want is generally about making the UI consistent with our interactions with the real world because those interactions are more intuitive to the human mind. (ex: minimizing windows in OSX visually takes you to the place in the bar as if it were a real object being stored temporarily)<br />
Thus bringing us back to point #1, less time worrying about using something correctly and more time living.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
