Comments on: shared-mime-info/xdgmime news http://blogs.gnome.org/cneumair/2005/12/01/shared-mime-infoxdgmime-news/ Just another GNOME Blogs weblog Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:28:02 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 By: Peter Bowen http://blogs.gnome.org/cneumair/2005/12/01/shared-mime-infoxdgmime-news/#comment-21 Peter Bowen Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/cneumair/2005/12/01/shared-mime-infoxdgmime-news/#comment-21 Maybe it would make more sense to use application/x-*+ogg, similar to XML, as it has the same purpose and issues? So application/x-flac+ogg, application/x-vorbis+ogg, etc.<p/>The XML Mimetype RFC basically points out the same issues with XML you are talking about with ogg. Maybe it would make more sense to use application/x-*+ogg, similar to XML, as it has the same purpose and issues? So application/x-flac+ogg, application/x-vorbis+ogg, etc.

The XML Mimetype RFC basically points out the same issues with XML you are talking about with ogg.

]]> By: Alexandre Prokoudine http://blogs.gnome.org/cneumair/2005/12/01/shared-mime-infoxdgmime-news/#comment-22 Alexandre Prokoudine Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/cneumair/2005/12/01/shared-mime-infoxdgmime-news/#comment-22 It would be great, if Raw files like .cr2 wouldn't be understood as TIFF files. Is there anything to do about that? It would be great, if Raw files like .cr2 wouldn’t be understood as TIFF files. Is there anything to do about that?

]]>