Comments on: media handling ("autoplay") followup http://blogs.gnome.org/cneumair/2007/01/14/media-handling-autoplay-followup/ Just another GNOME Blogs weblog Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:03:51 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: Luca http://blogs.gnome.org/cneumair/2007/01/14/media-handling-autoplay-followup/#comment-166 Luca Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/cneumair/2007/01/14/media-handling-autoplay-followup/#comment-166 Christian, great work, really. BTW desktop actions are also supported by XFCE [1], GNOME should really support them too.<p/>[1] - <a href="http://xfce-diary.blogspot.com/2006/02/desktop-actions.html">http://xfce-diary.blogspot.com/2006/02/desktop-actions.html</a> Christian, great work, really. BTW desktop actions are also supported by XFCE [1], GNOME should really support them too.

[1] - http://xfce-diary.blogspot.com/2006/02/desktop-actions.html

]]> By: Justin http://blogs.gnome.org/cneumair/2007/01/14/media-handling-autoplay-followup/#comment-167 Justin Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/cneumair/2007/01/14/media-handling-autoplay-followup/#comment-167 For "actions", Quicksilver (<a href="http://docs.blacktree.com/quicksilver/what_is_quicksilver">http://docs.blacktree.com/quicksilver/what_is_quicksilver</a>) should be used as an example of how to do things in a flexible manner. I think it is still a misunderstood application, the last discussion I saw about it was mostly people asking "How is this different from the deskbar applet?"<p/><br/> For “actions”, Quicksilver (http://docs.blacktree.com/quicksilver/what_is_quicksilver) should be used as an example of how to do things in a flexible manner. I think it is still a misunderstood application, the last discussion I saw about it was mostly people asking “How is this different from the deskbar applet?”

]]> By: Christian Neumair http://blogs.gnome.org/cneumair/2007/01/14/media-handling-autoplay-followup/#comment-168 Christian Neumair Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/cneumair/2007/01/14/media-handling-autoplay-followup/#comment-168 Luca: Thanks. Do you know where the XFCE architecture you mention is described/specified? Luca: Thanks. Do you know where the XFCE architecture you mention is described/specified?

]]> By: Luca http://blogs.gnome.org/cneumair/2007/01/14/media-handling-autoplay-followup/#comment-169 Luca Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/cneumair/2007/01/14/media-handling-autoplay-followup/#comment-169 Christian, the implementation is probably somewhere here:<br/><a href="http://svn.xfce.org/svn/xfce/thunar/trunk/thunar-vfs/thunar-vfs-mime-application.c">http://svn.xfce.org/svn/xfce/thunar/trunk/thunar-vfs/thunar-vfs-mime-application.c</a><br/>Or in one of the thunar-vfs-mime-* files. Sorry but I can't be more precise. As for the specification they follows freedesktop too. Christian, the implementation is probably somewhere here:
http://svn.xfce.org/svn/xfce/thunar/trunk/thunar-vfs/thunar-vfs-mime-application.c
Or in one of the thunar-vfs-mime-* files. Sorry but I can’t be more precise. As for the specification they follows freedesktop too.

]]> By: Luca http://blogs.gnome.org/cneumair/2007/01/14/media-handling-autoplay-followup/#comment-170 Luca Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/cneumair/2007/01/14/media-handling-autoplay-followup/#comment-170 This:<br/><a href="http://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1374">http://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1374</a><br/>and this<br/><a href="http://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1375">http://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1375</a><br/>seem to be the relevant bugs. This:
http://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1374
and this
http://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1375
seem to be the relevant bugs.

]]> By: Luca http://blogs.gnome.org/cneumair/2007/01/14/media-handling-autoplay-followup/#comment-171 Luca Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/cneumair/2007/01/14/media-handling-autoplay-followup/#comment-171 Oddly enough, it seems that multiple actions were stripped from freedesktop specification because "under-specified and not widely implemented"... [1][2] [1] - <a href="http://webcvs.freedesktop.org/menus/desktop-entry-spec/desktop-entry-spec.xml?r1=1.12&r2=1.13">http://webcvs.freedesktop.org/menus/desktop-entry-spec/desktop-entry-spec.xml?r1=1.12&r2=1.13</a> [2] - <a href="http://webcvs.freedesktop.org/menus/desktop-entry-spec/desktop-entry-spec.xml?r1=1.8&r2=1.9">http://webcvs.freedesktop.org/menus/desktop-entry-spec/desktop-entry-spec.xml?r1=1.8&r2=1.9</a> Oddly enough, it seems that multiple actions were stripped from freedesktop specification because “under-specified and not widely implemented”… [1][2] [1] - http://webcvs.freedesktop.org/menus/desktop-entry-spec/desktop-entry-spec.xml?r1=1.12&r2=1.13 [2] - http://webcvs.freedesktop.org/menus/desktop-entry-spec/desktop-entry-spec.xml?r1=1.8&r2=1.9

]]>