<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s done!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/cneumair/2008/07/08/its-done/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/cneumair/2008/07/08/its-done/</link>
	<description>Just another GNOME Blogs weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 11:15:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Denis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/cneumair/2008/07/08/its-done/comment-page-2/#comment-413</link>
		<dc:creator>Denis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/cneumair/2008/07/08/its-done/#comment-413</guid>
		<description>Well. They done this useless bullshit for file manager: tabs. But didn&#039;t the most usefull thing: split view. Idiots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well. They done this useless bullshit for file manager: tabs. But didn&#8217;t the most usefull thing: split view. Idiots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lluís</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/cneumair/2008/07/08/its-done/comment-page-2/#comment-408</link>
		<dc:creator>Lluís</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/cneumair/2008/07/08/its-done/#comment-408</guid>
		<description>I suppose that &quot;making the tab user interface consistent with Epiphany and GNOME Terminal&quot; means using the same hotkeys for the same actions.

If so, I don&#039;t know if there is such a thing in gtk, but as I&#039;ve already read about making hotkeys consistent across applications many times in different projects, I think it could be interesting to have something such as &quot;stock hotkeys&quot;, in the same way there already are stock icons, in order to ease using/managing the commonly-used &quot;hotkeyed&quot; actions.

This would also make easier to &quot;re-hotkey&quot; some actions to the user&#039;s taste in a once-for-all fashion (gconf supports something like &quot;overlayed&quot; configurations, right? this could be used for application-specific overrides).

Just an idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose that &#8220;making the tab user interface consistent with Epiphany and GNOME Terminal&#8221; means using the same hotkeys for the same actions.</p>
<p>If so, I don&#8217;t know if there is such a thing in gtk, but as I&#8217;ve already read about making hotkeys consistent across applications many times in different projects, I think it could be interesting to have something such as &#8220;stock hotkeys&#8221;, in the same way there already are stock icons, in order to ease using/managing the commonly-used &#8220;hotkeyed&#8221; actions.</p>
<p>This would also make easier to &#8220;re-hotkey&#8221; some actions to the user&#8217;s taste in a once-for-all fashion (gconf supports something like &#8220;overlayed&#8221; configurations, right? this could be used for application-specific overrides).</p>
<p>Just an idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Invasione di TAB (schede) in GNOME 3? « pollycoke :)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/cneumair/2008/07/08/its-done/comment-page-2/#comment-404</link>
		<dc:creator>Invasione di TAB (schede) in GNOME 3? « pollycoke :)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/cneumair/2008/07/08/its-done/#comment-404</guid>
		<description>[...] avvenuta tra diversi sviluppatori GNOME, mentre ero un po&#8217; AFK. Le cose sono degenerate fino ad ottenere ciò che potete ammirare in questa piccola galleria in cui cerco di riunire tutti gli [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] avvenuta tra diversi sviluppatori GNOME, mentre ero un po&#8217; AFK. Le cose sono degenerate fino ad ottenere ciò che potete ammirare in questa piccola galleria in cui cerco di riunire tutti gli [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/cneumair/2008/07/08/its-done/comment-page-2/#comment-383</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 04:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/cneumair/2008/07/08/its-done/#comment-383</guid>
		<description>This better not be another one of those tab jokes, because I am really dying for tab support in nautilus.

Please god, don&#039;t let this be a joke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This better not be another one of those tab jokes, because I am really dying for tab support in nautilus.</p>
<p>Please god, don&#8217;t let this be a joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murray Cumming</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/cneumair/2008/07/08/its-done/comment-page-2/#comment-378</link>
		<dc:creator>Murray Cumming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 08:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/cneumair/2008/07/08/its-done/#comment-378</guid>
		<description>&gt; &gt; This is only in browser mode, right, not spatial?
&gt; Yes, of course.

Cheers. I find the browser mode awful anyway, particularly for non-technical users, so I&#039;m not bothered. I do like that the feature is invisible anyway unless you explicitly want to use tabs, as it is in Firefox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; &gt; This is only in browser mode, right, not spatial?<br />
&gt; Yes, of course.</p>
<p>Cheers. I find the browser mode awful anyway, particularly for non-technical users, so I&#8217;m not bothered. I do like that the feature is invisible anyway unless you explicitly want to use tabs, as it is in Firefox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/cneumair/2008/07/08/its-done/comment-page-2/#comment-377</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 03:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/cneumair/2008/07/08/its-done/#comment-377</guid>
		<description>Not a fan of tabs myself but it is a relatively unobtrusive option so I&#039;m glad to see you making efforts to keep users happy. 

For those who long for the days of Gnome Midnight Commander and are interested in Tabs and Split Views you may want to look at an experimental web browser called &quot;Tab Lanes&quot; 
http://www.tablane.com/screenshots.php?tab=screenshots
As far as the idea went it seemed slightly more practical than the split view system offered by Konqueror. Not that I want to encourage that sort of thing. 

I&#039;m still hoping for file management that makes it as easy to sort and manage the stream incoming files as it is to sort and file my incoming mail.  Tagging and searching also offer a brighter future for file management.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not a fan of tabs myself but it is a relatively unobtrusive option so I&#8217;m glad to see you making efforts to keep users happy. </p>
<p>For those who long for the days of Gnome Midnight Commander and are interested in Tabs and Split Views you may want to look at an experimental web browser called &#8220;Tab Lanes&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.tablane.com/screenshots.php?tab=screenshots" rel="nofollow">http://www.tablane.com/screenshots.php?tab=screenshots</a><br />
As far as the idea went it seemed slightly more practical than the split view system offered by Konqueror. Not that I want to encourage that sort of thing. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m still hoping for file management that makes it as easy to sort and manage the stream incoming files as it is to sort and file my incoming mail.  Tagging and searching also offer a brighter future for file management.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calum Benson: Tab frenzy &#124; labor</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/cneumair/2008/07/08/its-done/comment-page-2/#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>Calum Benson: Tab frenzy &#124; labor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 22:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/cneumair/2008/07/08/its-done/#comment-373</guid>
		<description>[...] to admit I cringe every time somebody adds tabs to an application. Not because I have anything against appropriate use of tabs (and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to admit I cringe every time somebody adds tabs to an application. Not because I have anything against appropriate use of tabs (and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peteris Krisjanis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/cneumair/2008/07/08/its-done/comment-page-2/#comment-364</link>
		<dc:creator>Peteris Krisjanis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 21:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/cneumair/2008/07/08/its-done/#comment-364</guid>
		<description>Finally something to get rid of n opened windows of Nautilus :) And people who loath it - come on, don&#039;t want it - don&#039;t use it. Nautilus with and without tabs is still Nautilus (as Terminal and Firefox, by the way). It is not like you are forced to use it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally something to get rid of n opened windows of Nautilus <img src='http://blogs.gnome.org/cneumair/wp-content/mu-plugins/tango-smilies/tango/face-smile.png' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  And people who loath it &#8211; come on, don&#8217;t want it &#8211; don&#8217;t use it. Nautilus with and without tabs is still Nautilus (as Terminal and Firefox, by the way). It is not like you are forced to use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cneumair</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/cneumair/2008/07/08/its-done/comment-page-2/#comment-360</link>
		<dc:creator>cneumair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 20:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/cneumair/2008/07/08/its-done/#comment-360</guid>
		<description>&gt; This is only in browser mode, right, not spatial?

Yes, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>> This is only in browser mode, right, not spatial?</p>
<p>Yes, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murray Cumming</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/cneumair/2008/07/08/its-done/comment-page-2/#comment-359</link>
		<dc:creator>Murray Cumming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 20:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/cneumair/2008/07/08/its-done/#comment-359</guid>
		<description>This is only in browser mode, right, not spatial?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is only in browser mode, right, not spatial?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
