<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: dear lazyweb: svdo?  add2?  mec?  confusion.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/2007/03/31/dear-lazyweb-svdo-add2-mec-confusion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/2007/03/31/dear-lazyweb-svdo-add2-mec-confusion/</link>
	<description>a lowercase manifesto</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 11:31:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: knipknap</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/2007/03/31/dear-lazyweb-svdo-add2-mec-confusion/comment-page-1/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>knipknap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/2007/03/31/dear-lazyweb-svdo-add2-mec-confusion/#comment-175</guid>
		<description>I have an X3000 and I have had nothing but trouble with it:&lt;p/&gt;- It is not automatically recognized in Feisty. Well, easy fix.&lt;p/&gt;- Using the i810 driver, 3D works perfectly fine with AIGLX + Compiz, except when I activate it and used it a little, my machine crashes (automatically reboots) without any hint why (log contains no errors). Happens so often that I had to deactivate 3D entirely.&lt;p/&gt;- I can&#039;t get screen resolutions &gt; 1600x1200 to work at all. The 915resolution tool does not do it (using it only reduces the screen resolution to 640x480), and when using the new &quot;modesetting&quot; driver, no output is produced at all. I hear that this might have something to do with the fact that I use an ADD2 card for output.&lt;p/&gt;I can not recommend this card at all. I am now seriously thinking about getting an additional (non-onboard) card. It might require proprietary software, but at least it works... :-(.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have an X3000 and I have had nothing but trouble with it:
<p />- It is not automatically recognized in Feisty. Well, easy fix.
<p />- Using the i810 driver, 3D works perfectly fine with AIGLX + Compiz, except when I activate it and used it a little, my machine crashes (automatically reboots) without any hint why (log contains no errors). Happens so often that I had to deactivate 3D entirely.
<p />- I can&#8217;t get screen resolutions &gt; 1600&#215;1200 to work at all. The 915resolution tool does not do it (using it only reduces the screen resolution to 640&#215;480), and when using the new &#8220;modesetting&#8221; driver, no output is produced at all. I hear that this might have something to do with the fact that I use an ADD2 card for output.
<p />I can not recommend this card at all. I am now seriously thinking about getting an additional (non-onboard) card. It might require proprietary software, but at least it works&#8230; :-(.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/2007/03/31/dear-lazyweb-svdo-add2-mec-confusion/comment-page-1/#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/2007/03/31/dear-lazyweb-svdo-add2-mec-confusion/#comment-176</guid>
		<description>It is why AMD has created a new DTX standard that is full backwards compatibility with ATX. It is cheaper for the companies to make it without have to make big change.&lt;p/&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DTX_&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DTX_&lt;/a&gt;(form_factor)&lt;p/&gt;There is no point to have BTX these day when AMD/Intel are making their chipests lower power and lower heat. Intel created BTX for P4&#039;s sake that create a lot of heats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is why AMD has created a new DTX standard that is full backwards compatibility with ATX. It is cheaper for the companies to make it without have to make big change.
<p /><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DTX_">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DTX_</a>(form_factor)
<p />There is no point to have BTX these day when AMD/Intel are making their chipests lower power and lower heat. Intel created BTX for P4&#8242;s sake that create a lot of heats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: desrt</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/2007/03/31/dear-lazyweb-svdo-add2-mec-confusion/comment-page-1/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>desrt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/2007/03/31/dear-lazyweb-svdo-add2-mec-confusion/#comment-177</guid>
		<description>knipknap: what board do you have?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>knipknap: what board do you have?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: knipknap</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/2007/03/31/dear-lazyweb-svdo-add2-mec-confusion/comment-page-1/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>knipknap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/2007/03/31/dear-lazyweb-svdo-add2-mec-confusion/#comment-178</guid>
		<description>Intel G965WH (+ ADD2 card for DVI)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Intel G965WH (+ ADD2 card for DVI)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Prilph-Ool</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/2007/03/31/dear-lazyweb-svdo-add2-mec-confusion/comment-page-1/#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>A Prilph-Ool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/2007/03/31/dear-lazyweb-svdo-add2-mec-confusion/#comment-179</guid>
		<description>Why not get an AMD motherboard with build in ATI chipset - like the xpres200M. AMD even supply linux drivers that let you run games like glxgears.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not get an AMD motherboard with build in ATI chipset &#8211; like the xpres200M. AMD even supply linux drivers that let you run games like glxgears.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rene Wagner</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/2007/03/31/dear-lazyweb-svdo-add2-mec-confusion/comment-page-1/#comment-180</link>
		<dc:creator>Rene Wagner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/2007/03/31/dear-lazyweb-svdo-add2-mec-confusion/#comment-180</guid>
		<description>Have you seen this? It might clarify a few things.&lt;p/&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://wiki.x.org/wiki/SDVOADD2Cards&quot;&gt;http://wiki.x.org/wiki/SDVOADD2Cards&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you seen this? It might clarify a few things.
<p /><a href="http://wiki.x.org/wiki/SDVOADD2Cards">http://wiki.x.org/wiki/SDVOADD2Cards</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: desrt</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/2007/03/31/dear-lazyweb-svdo-add2-mec-confusion/comment-page-1/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>desrt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/2007/03/31/dear-lazyweb-svdo-add2-mec-confusion/#comment-181</guid>
		<description>knipknap: who made your add2 card?  intel?  what model?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>knipknap: who made your add2 card?  intel?  what model?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ajax</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/2007/03/31/dear-lazyweb-svdo-add2-mec-confusion/comment-page-1/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>ajax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/2007/03/31/dear-lazyweb-svdo-add2-mec-confusion/#comment-182</guid>
		<description>ADD2 is the name for the card, SDVO is the name for the protocol (ie, I Can&#039;t Believe It&#039;s Not PCIE).  MEC is some fancy new lie that means the same thing as ADD2.  Sort of the same way it&#039;s really a 965 graphics chip but you keep calling it X3000.&lt;p/&gt;At this point the modesetting branch has been merged to master.  So you&#039;ll need to run an intel driver with a version number of 1.9.91 or higher, and a 1.3 RC X server or newer.  Fedora 7 will have both out of the box.&lt;p/&gt;I&#039;ve got like three of these cards at the office, they work pretty well so far.  Let me know if you have trouble with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ADD2 is the name for the card, SDVO is the name for the protocol (ie, I Can&#8217;t Believe It&#8217;s Not PCIE).  MEC is some fancy new lie that means the same thing as ADD2.  Sort of the same way it&#8217;s really a 965 graphics chip but you keep calling it X3000.
<p />At this point the modesetting branch has been merged to master.  So you&#8217;ll need to run an intel driver with a version number of 1.9.91 or higher, and a 1.3 RC X server or newer.  Fedora 7 will have both out of the box.
<p />I&#8217;ve got like three of these cards at the office, they work pretty well so far.  Let me know if you have trouble with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: knipknap</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/2007/03/31/dear-lazyweb-svdo-add2-mec-confusion/comment-page-1/#comment-183</link>
		<dc:creator>knipknap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/2007/03/31/dear-lazyweb-svdo-add2-mec-confusion/#comment-183</guid>
		<description>desrt: I have not idea (it&#039;s a stock PC, and the docs don&#039;t contain that information). It does seem to show up in lspci. The only things I see there:&lt;p/&gt;00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 82G965 Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 02)&lt;br/&gt;00:02.1 Display controller: Intel Corporation 82G965 Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 02)&lt;br/&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>desrt: I have not idea (it&#8217;s a stock PC, and the docs don&#8217;t contain that information). It does seem to show up in lspci. The only things I see there:
<p />00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 82G965 Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 02)<br />00:02.1 Display controller: Intel Corporation 82G965 Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 02)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  blogs.gnome.org/desrt/2007/03/31/dear-lazyweb-svdo-add2-mec-confusion/feed/ ) in 0.21398 seconds, on Feb 11th, 2012 at 6:40 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 11th, 2012 at 7:40 am UTC -->
