<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;be excellent to each other&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/2009/10/13/be-excellent-to-each-other/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/2009/10/13/be-excellent-to-each-other/</link>
	<description>a lowercase manifesto</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 11:31:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pvanhoof</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/2009/10/13/be-excellent-to-each-other/comment-page-1/#comment-579</link>
		<dc:creator>pvanhoof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/?p=101#comment-579</guid>
		<description>Aha, thanks for this Ryan. This is also how I feel about this trend where the online society wants to say for each and every person what they are doing wrong (even if there&#039;s no malice at all).

I explained my point of view on this here:

http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2008/09/14/moral-indulgence

&quot;I questioned whether only intent can either be good or bad, but that question was refuted as irrelevant. For it’s the beholder who matters. Not the producer.&quot;

&quot;The reason for this irrelevance being that an audience doesn’t take the responsibility of trying to understand intent. I disagree with this conclusion. I think the audience does understand intent.&quot;

And in comments:

&quot;I said audience has a responsibility to decide for themselves whether or not the ideas that appear on a website (like my blog) are either true, false, idiot, genius, acceptable, immoral, etc. ...&quot;

&quot;I say that audience has the capacity to understand intent and that audience, if it wants to be relevant audience, needs to utilize this capacity. &quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aha, thanks for this Ryan. This is also how I feel about this trend where the online society wants to say for each and every person what they are doing wrong (even if there&#8217;s no malice at all).</p>
<p>I explained my point of view on this here:</p>
<p><a href="http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2008/09/14/moral-indulgence" rel="nofollow">http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2008/09/14/moral-indulgence</a></p>
<p>&#8220;I questioned whether only intent can either be good or bad, but that question was refuted as irrelevant. For it’s the beholder who matters. Not the producer.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;The reason for this irrelevance being that an audience doesn’t take the responsibility of trying to understand intent. I disagree with this conclusion. I think the audience does understand intent.&#8221;</p>
<p>And in comments:</p>
<p>&#8220;I said audience has a responsibility to decide for themselves whether or not the ideas that appear on a website (like my blog) are either true, false, idiot, genius, acceptable, immoral, etc. &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;I say that audience has the capacity to understand intent and that audience, if it wants to be relevant audience, needs to utilize this capacity. &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TGM</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/2009/10/13/be-excellent-to-each-other/comment-page-1/#comment-578</link>
		<dc:creator>TGM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 08:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/?p=101#comment-578</guid>
		<description>“be excellent to each other”

Bill and Ted! Excellent!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“be excellent to each other”</p>
<p>Bill and Ted! Excellent!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murray Cumming</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/2009/10/13/be-excellent-to-each-other/comment-page-1/#comment-577</link>
		<dc:creator>Murray Cumming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 08:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/?p=101#comment-577</guid>
		<description>Yeah, that&#039;s in the (slightly older) GNOME code of conduct, which is a little more concise:
http://live.gnome.org/CodeOfConduct</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, that&#8217;s in the (slightly older) GNOME code of conduct, which is a little more concise:<br />
<a href="http://live.gnome.org/CodeOfConduct" rel="nofollow">http://live.gnome.org/CodeOfConduct</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Lord</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/2009/10/13/be-excellent-to-each-other/comment-page-1/#comment-576</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Lord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 07:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/?p=101#comment-576</guid>
		<description>In agreement with Adam Williamson here. I was always taught that you should be respectful of other peoples&#039; feelings, so if you&#039;ve offended someone, you should apologise for offending them and try not to do it again. I think that&#039;s pretty reasonable. People are clearly offended, I don&#039;t see what&#039;s so hard about apologising (and meaning it).

I agree that some of the blog posts about this have gone totally over the top, but that doesn&#039;t mean that there isn&#039;t an issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In agreement with Adam Williamson here. I was always taught that you should be respectful of other peoples&#8217; feelings, so if you&#8217;ve offended someone, you should apologise for offending them and try not to do it again. I think that&#8217;s pretty reasonable. People are clearly offended, I don&#8217;t see what&#8217;s so hard about apologising (and meaning it).</p>
<p>I agree that some of the blog posts about this have gone totally over the top, but that doesn&#8217;t mean that there isn&#8217;t an issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Williamson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/2009/10/13/be-excellent-to-each-other/comment-page-1/#comment-575</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Williamson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 06:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/?p=101#comment-575</guid>
		<description>Tim: that&#039;s...uh...what? Barack Obama makes rather a lot of political speeches, does that make him a political extremist? Some people write lots of blog entries about coding, does that make them coding extremists? You&#039;re not making any sense. I don&#039;t really know what else to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim: that&#8217;s&#8230;uh&#8230;what? Barack Obama makes rather a lot of political speeches, does that make him a political extremist? Some people write lots of blog entries about coding, does that make them coding extremists? You&#8217;re not making any sense. I don&#8217;t really know what else to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/2009/10/13/be-excellent-to-each-other/comment-page-1/#comment-574</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 06:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/?p=101#comment-574</guid>
		<description>The sheer number of blog posts and comments some people (lefty, adam etc.) have left are a clear indication of extremism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sheer number of blog posts and comments some people (lefty, adam etc.) have left are a clear indication of extremism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Williamson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/2009/10/13/be-excellent-to-each-other/comment-page-1/#comment-573</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Williamson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 05:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/?p=101#comment-573</guid>
		<description>No-one is &#039;being flogged&#039;. This kind of misrepresentation is getting really tiresome. Someone pointed out a remark which had an unfortunate effect - no malice was ever presumed, no allegation of malicious intent was ever made - and asked for an apology _for the effect of the remark_, not for any malicious intent. No apology has been made. There is the story in a nutshell. The lack of apology is the most worrying thing. Everyone assumed Mark meant well. That&#039;s why someone approached him privately to ask if he&#039;d maybe say sorry before making it public. That&#039;s why everyone was extremely careful to say they were complaining only about the substance of an individual remark, not suggesting anything negative about his character in general or his intentions or motivations. Despite all of this care, there&#039;s still been no apology.

Jamie, if you think this is extremism, you lead a really, really sheltered life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No-one is &#8216;being flogged&#8217;. This kind of misrepresentation is getting really tiresome. Someone pointed out a remark which had an unfortunate effect &#8211; no malice was ever presumed, no allegation of malicious intent was ever made &#8211; and asked for an apology _for the effect of the remark_, not for any malicious intent. No apology has been made. There is the story in a nutshell. The lack of apology is the most worrying thing. Everyone assumed Mark meant well. That&#8217;s why someone approached him privately to ask if he&#8217;d maybe say sorry before making it public. That&#8217;s why everyone was extremely careful to say they were complaining only about the substance of an individual remark, not suggesting anything negative about his character in general or his intentions or motivations. Despite all of this care, there&#8217;s still been no apology.</p>
<p>Jamie, if you think this is extremism, you lead a really, really sheltered life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aria Stewart</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/2009/10/13/be-excellent-to-each-other/comment-page-1/#comment-572</link>
		<dc:creator>Aria Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 03:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/?p=101#comment-572</guid>
		<description>Yes indeed! I think that&#039;s something that really needs to be kept in mind in the talks about sexism that are occurring lately. It&#039;s a problem, but it&#039;s certainly not out of malice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes indeed! I think that&#8217;s something that really needs to be kept in mind in the talks about sexism that are occurring lately. It&#8217;s a problem, but it&#8217;s certainly not out of malice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie McCracken</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/2009/10/13/be-excellent-to-each-other/comment-page-1/#comment-571</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie McCracken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 03:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/?p=101#comment-571</guid>
		<description>Great to see common sense winning over extremist political correctness!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great to see common sense winning over extremist political correctness!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Smith</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/2009/10/13/be-excellent-to-each-other/comment-page-1/#comment-570</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 03:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/?p=101#comment-570</guid>
		<description>Blog post of the month. +5 internets and a webby. Would buy again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blog post of the month. +5 internets and a webby. Would buy again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  blogs.gnome.org/desrt/2009/10/13/be-excellent-to-each-other/feed/ ) in 0.19112 seconds, on Feb 11th, 2012 at 3:30 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 11th, 2012 at 4:30 am UTC -->
