<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nokia II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/fsmw/2006/10/11/nokia-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/fsmw/2006/10/11/nokia-ii/</link>
	<description>Just another GNOME Blogs weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Federico Lucifredi (federico-II)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/fsmw/2006/10/11/nokia-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Federico Lucifredi (federico-II)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/fsmw/2006/10/11/nokia-ii/#comment-31</guid>
		<description>So, what you are saying is that Nokia should get involved in *any* activity related to Gnome ? I doubt they would agree. Even if they did, there would be the usual problem with big companies: the left hand does not know what the right does.&lt;p/&gt;I understand there was no money involved, but hey, Nokia has the right to decide in which ways to get involved with Gnome and in which ways not to - isn&#039;t Gnome about freedom, after all ? :)&lt;p/&gt;This whole thing sounds like a storm in a teacup if you ask me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, what you are saying is that Nokia should get involved in *any* activity related to Gnome ? I doubt they would agree. Even if they did, there would be the usual problem with big companies: the left hand does not know what the right does.
<p />I understand there was no money involved, but hey, Nokia has the right to decide in which ways to get involved with Gnome and in which ways not to &#8211; isn&#8217;t Gnome about freedom, after all ? <img src='http://blogs.gnome.org/fsmw/wp-content/mu-plugins/tango-smilies/tango/face-smile.png' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />
<p />This whole thing sounds like a storm in a teacup if you ask me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fsmw</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/fsmw/2006/10/11/nokia-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>fsmw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/fsmw/2006/10/11/nokia-ii/#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Yes, you are right too, and following your line, i&#039;ve the right to comment it!, if there are right for everything.&lt;p/&gt;But what i want to point it, is that Nokia don&#039;t see a real market in OSS in Chile, and that&#039;s not only a Nokia problem, that&#039;s part of our digital gap, we&#039;re too small and to undeveloped that we only can get IT from the past, IT deprecated in Europe or USA. In Spain i was able to buy Nokia 770 at shop, in Chile i can&#039;t!.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, you are right too, and following your line, i&#8217;ve the right to comment it!, if there are right for everything.
<p />But what i want to point it, is that Nokia don&#8217;t see a real market in OSS in Chile, and that&#8217;s not only a Nokia problem, that&#8217;s part of our digital gap, we&#8217;re too small and to undeveloped that we only can get IT from the past, IT deprecated in Europe or USA. In Spain i was able to buy Nokia 770 at shop, in Chile i can&#8217;t!.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Federico Lucifredi (federico-II)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/fsmw/2006/10/11/nokia-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Federico Lucifredi (federico-II)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/fsmw/2006/10/11/nokia-ii/#comment-33</guid>
		<description>haha - yes, you are free to comment ;-)&lt;p/&gt;Concerning the point on Chile&#039;s digital gap, I think you are wrong. I am in Boston right now, and I cannot buy a 770 in any store I know of. I see how in some big telephony markets in Europe it could be sold as a cool gizmo tho (it is not all that useful *yet* if you ask me ;-).&lt;p/&gt;Concerning OSS markets, well, some people would question the existence of OSS markets in the first place - look a the leader of the pack, RHAT is barely making $300M/year, that is small potatoes compared to even relatively small proprietary software companies. What I am saying is, Microsoft can afford to chase all markets, while OSS operators cannot (yet) - but don&#039;t despair: RHAT&#039;s purchase of those two small companies in Argentina and Brazil is clearly designed to establish both Spanish and Portoughese speaking presence in the southern cone. &lt;p/&gt;By the way, is Chile currently a MSFT monocolture in the enterprise, just like Italy is ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha &#8211; yes, you are free to comment <img src='http://blogs.gnome.org/fsmw/wp-content/mu-plugins/tango-smilies/tango/face-wink.png' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />
<p />Concerning the point on Chile&#8217;s digital gap, I think you are wrong. I am in Boston right now, and I cannot buy a 770 in any store I know of. I see how in some big telephony markets in Europe it could be sold as a cool gizmo tho (it is not all that useful *yet* if you ask me <img src='http://blogs.gnome.org/fsmw/wp-content/mu-plugins/tango-smilies/tango/face-wink.png' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> .
<p />Concerning OSS markets, well, some people would question the existence of OSS markets in the first place &#8211; look a the leader of the pack, RHAT is barely making $300M/year, that is small potatoes compared to even relatively small proprietary software companies. What I am saying is, Microsoft can afford to chase all markets, while OSS operators cannot (yet) &#8211; but don&#8217;t despair: RHAT&#8217;s purchase of those two small companies in Argentina and Brazil is clearly designed to establish both Spanish and Portoughese speaking presence in the southern cone.
<p />By the way, is Chile currently a MSFT monocolture in the enterprise, just like Italy is ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Federico Lucifredi (federico-II)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/fsmw/2006/10/11/nokia-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Federico Lucifredi (federico-II)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/fsmw/2006/10/11/nokia-ii/#comment-34</guid>
		<description>haha - yes, you are free to comment ;-)&lt;p/&gt;Concerning the point on Chile&#039;s digital gap, I think you are wrong. I am in Boston right now, and I cannot buy a 770 in any store I know of. I see how in some big telephony markets in Europe it could be sold as a cool gizmo tho (it is not all that useful *yet* if you ask me ;-).&lt;p/&gt;Concerning OSS markets, well, some people would question the existence of OSS markets in the first place - look a the leader of the pack, RHAT is barely making $300M/year, that is small potatoes compared to even relatively small proprietary software companies. What I am saying is, Microsoft can afford to chase all markets, while OSS operators cannot (yet) - but don&#039;t despair: RHAT&#039;s purchase of those two small companies in Argentina and Brazil is clearly designed to establish both Spanish and Portoughese speaking presence in the southern cone. &lt;p/&gt;By the way, is Chile currently a MSFT monocolture in the enterprise, just like Italy is ? What about Argentina ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha &#8211; yes, you are free to comment <img src='http://blogs.gnome.org/fsmw/wp-content/mu-plugins/tango-smilies/tango/face-wink.png' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />
<p />Concerning the point on Chile&#8217;s digital gap, I think you are wrong. I am in Boston right now, and I cannot buy a 770 in any store I know of. I see how in some big telephony markets in Europe it could be sold as a cool gizmo tho (it is not all that useful *yet* if you ask me <img src='http://blogs.gnome.org/fsmw/wp-content/mu-plugins/tango-smilies/tango/face-wink.png' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> .
<p />Concerning OSS markets, well, some people would question the existence of OSS markets in the first place &#8211; look a the leader of the pack, RHAT is barely making $300M/year, that is small potatoes compared to even relatively small proprietary software companies. What I am saying is, Microsoft can afford to chase all markets, while OSS operators cannot (yet) &#8211; but don&#8217;t despair: RHAT&#8217;s purchase of those two small companies in Argentina and Brazil is clearly designed to establish both Spanish and Portoughese speaking presence in the southern cone.
<p />By the way, is Chile currently a MSFT monocolture in the enterprise, just like Italy is ? What about Argentina ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fsmw</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/fsmw/2006/10/11/nokia-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>fsmw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/fsmw/2006/10/11/nokia-ii/#comment-35</guid>
		<description>May be u can&#039;t at USA, but still there are a lot of IT that we don&#039;t find it here. and yes Chile is very MSFT monoculture, however we keep working every day to change this, even if we just give 2 cents. My rant is dedicated to Nokia Chile because i feel that they can do more, if they want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May be u can&#8217;t at USA, but still there are a lot of IT that we don&#8217;t find it here. and yes Chile is very MSFT monoculture, however we keep working every day to change this, even if we just give 2 cents. My rant is dedicated to Nokia Chile because i feel that they can do more, if they want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
