<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts on a probable opensolaris.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/gman/2008/03/16/thoughts-on-a-probable-opensolariscom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/gman/2008/03/16/thoughts-on-a-probable-opensolariscom/</link>
	<description>Glynn Foster . OpenSolaris . Ireland . GNOME . Climbing . New Zealand . Brewing . Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 06:26:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anton Parol</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/gman/2008/03/16/thoughts-on-a-probable-opensolariscom/comment-page-1/#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator>Anton Parol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/gman/2008/03/16/thoughts-on-a-probable-opensolariscom/#comment-245</guid>
		<description>Its so true. Its really easy to GET with ubuntu, and thats probably been one of its biggest stengths. People don&#039;t feel burdened trying to use it, meaning they give it that little bit more time. Given how strongly Jonathan feels about getting Solaris out there, it can only be a good thing!
Ant</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its so true. Its really easy to GET with ubuntu, and thats probably been one of its biggest stengths. People don&#8217;t feel burdened trying to use it, meaning they give it that little bit more time. Given how strongly Jonathan feels about getting Solaris out there, it can only be a good thing!<br />
Ant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Murdock&#8217;s Weblog &#187; Order is important</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/gman/2008/03/16/thoughts-on-a-probable-opensolariscom/comment-page-1/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Murdock&#8217;s Weblog &#187; Order is important</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 11:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/gman/2008/03/16/thoughts-on-a-probable-opensolariscom/#comment-237</guid>
		<description>[...] Glynn Foster: &#8220;Get. Use. Learn. Love. Spread. Only then, in my opinion, can we even think about Contribute&#8230;&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Glynn Foster: &#8220;Get. Use. Learn. Love. Spread. Only then, in my opinion, can we even think about Contribute&#8230;&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tecosystems &#187; links for 2008-03-17</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/gman/2008/03/16/thoughts-on-a-probable-opensolariscom/comment-page-1/#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>tecosystems &#187; links for 2008-03-17</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 05:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/gman/2008/03/16/thoughts-on-a-probable-opensolariscom/#comment-236</guid>
		<description>[...] Life is so good, it gets better every day » Blog Archive » Thoughts on a probable opensolaris.com a look at some of the ideas for opensolaris.com; i think some of the top level nav elements are a bit abstract, but it&#8217;s otherwise pretty good (tags: opensolaris.com glynnfoster informationarchitecture) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Life is so good, it gets better every day » Blog Archive » Thoughts on a probable opensolaris.com a look at some of the ideas for opensolaris.com; i think some of the top level nav elements are a bit abstract, but it&#8217;s otherwise pretty good (tags: opensolaris.com glynnfoster informationarchitecture) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EdwardOCallaghan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/gman/2008/03/16/thoughts-on-a-probable-opensolariscom/comment-page-1/#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator>EdwardOCallaghan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 03:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/gman/2008/03/16/thoughts-on-a-probable-opensolariscom/#comment-235</guid>
		<description>&quot;developers.opensolaris.org and use http://www.opensolaris.org as that front end.&quot;
+1
That&#039;s a fantastic idea!
Regards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;developers.opensolaris.org and use <a href="http://www.opensolaris.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.opensolaris.org</a> as that front end.&#8221;<br />
+1<br />
That&#8217;s a fantastic idea!<br />
Regards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damian Wojs?aw (trochej)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/gman/2008/03/16/thoughts-on-a-probable-opensolariscom/comment-page-1/#comment-234</link>
		<dc:creator>Damian Wojs?aw (trochej)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 17:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/gman/2008/03/16/thoughts-on-a-probable-opensolariscom/#comment-234</guid>
		<description>I believe such refactoring would do much good to OpenSolaris. I think that while oopensolaris.org is a great resource for us, who know what we are talking about, people that I encourage to try are often confused. On the other hand I&#039;m not sure if .org and .com are proper ways of managing this difference. I think it&#039;d do more sense what Alberto Ruis already said.
What really is missing is a strong and simple message what really OpenSolaris is, something along the lines: &quot;OS is a core and a basis of an operating system kernel and userland tools. For a working distribution look here&quot;. And it ought to be bold, big letters and a first message on the page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe such refactoring would do much good to OpenSolaris. I think that while oopensolaris.org is a great resource for us, who know what we are talking about, people that I encourage to try are often confused. On the other hand I&#8217;m not sure if .org and .com are proper ways of managing this difference. I think it&#8217;d do more sense what Alberto Ruis already said.<br />
What really is missing is a strong and simple message what really OpenSolaris is, something along the lines: &#8220;OS is a core and a basis of an operating system kernel and userland tools. For a working distribution look here&#8221;. And it ought to be bold, big letters and a first message on the page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News &#187; links for 2008-03-16</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/gman/2008/03/16/thoughts-on-a-probable-opensolariscom/comment-page-1/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>News &#187; links for 2008-03-16</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 10:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/gman/2008/03/16/thoughts-on-a-probable-opensolariscom/#comment-233</guid>
		<description>[...] Thoughts on a probable opensolaris.com This looks like a pretty rational step. All the development of the code-base (and optionally the distros themselves) on OpenSolaris.org and all the user/sysadmin forums and downloads on opensolaris.com (tags: OpenSolaris) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thoughts on a probable opensolaris.com This looks like a pretty rational step. All the development of the code-base (and optionally the distros themselves) on OpenSolaris.org and all the user/sysadmin forums and downloads on opensolaris.com (tags: OpenSolaris) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2008-03-16 &#124; sun</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/gman/2008/03/16/thoughts-on-a-probable-opensolariscom/comment-page-1/#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2008-03-16 &#124; sun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 09:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/gman/2008/03/16/thoughts-on-a-probable-opensolariscom/#comment-232</guid>
		<description>[...] Thoughts on a probable opensolaris.com This looks like a pretty rational step. All the development of the code-base (and optionally the distros themselves) on OpenSolaris.org and all the user/sysadmin forums and downloads on opensolaris.com (tags: OpenSolaris) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thoughts on a probable opensolaris.com This looks like a pretty rational step. All the development of the code-base (and optionally the distros themselves) on OpenSolaris.org and all the user/sysadmin forums and downloads on opensolaris.com (tags: OpenSolaris) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alberto Ruiz</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/gman/2008/03/16/thoughts-on-a-probable-opensolariscom/comment-page-1/#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>Alberto Ruiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 03:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/gman/2008/03/16/thoughts-on-a-probable-opensolariscom/#comment-231</guid>
		<description>I agree with most ideas there, but to be honest, I can&#039;t see why this should be in opensolaris.com, instead of moving what we have to developers.opensolaris.org and use www.opensolaris.org as that front end.

On top of that, I&#039;m pretty sure that &quot;.com&quot; is not going to be welcomed to the people who sustain that Sun is not very sensible to the community culture.

On the other hand, setting up yet-another-opensoaris-thingie is going to raise even more the barrier to understand the project. I&#039;d rather simplify what we have, with focus on all the issues you just pointed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with most ideas there, but to be honest, I can&#8217;t see why this should be in opensolaris.com, instead of moving what we have to developers.opensolaris.org and use <a href="http://www.opensolaris.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.opensolaris.org</a> as that front end.</p>
<p>On top of that, I&#8217;m pretty sure that &#8220;.com&#8221; is not going to be welcomed to the people who sustain that Sun is not very sensible to the community culture.</p>
<p>On the other hand, setting up yet-another-opensoaris-thingie is going to raise even more the barrier to understand the project. I&#8217;d rather simplify what we have, with focus on all the issues you just pointed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  blogs.gnome.org/gman/2008/03/16/thoughts-on-a-probable-opensolariscom/feed/ ) in 1.19089 seconds, on Feb 12th, 2012 at 7:32 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 12th, 2012 at 8:32 am UTC -->
