<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OpenSolaris RC1 Hits the Streets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/gman/2008/11/09/opensolaris-rc1-hits-the-streets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/gman/2008/11/09/opensolaris-rc1-hits-the-streets/</link>
	<description>Glynn Foster . OpenSolaris . Ireland . GNOME . Climbing . New Zealand . Brewing . Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 06:26:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Nordquist</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/gman/2008/11/09/opensolaris-rc1-hits-the-streets/comment-page-1/#comment-452</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Nordquist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 14:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/gman/?p=628#comment-452</guid>
		<description>I really was impressed by the likenesses to Fedora 10; however, my CD drive (Inspiron 2650, therefore bog-standard laptop-PATA easy replacement?) crawls and the install fails when it can&#039;t unmount the CD.  The 10u6 iso is not even bootable.  Why in blazes does this latest LiveCD want to unmount the CD for an install, and why wasn&#039;t 10u6 bootable?  Metaquestion: Why do the massive matches in defect.opensolaris.org not seem to relate yet....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really was impressed by the likenesses to Fedora 10; however, my CD drive (Inspiron 2650, therefore bog-standard laptop-PATA easy replacement?) crawls and the install fails when it can&#8217;t unmount the CD.  The 10u6 iso is not even bootable.  Why in blazes does this latest LiveCD want to unmount the CD for an install, and why wasn&#8217;t 10u6 bootable?  Metaquestion: Why do the massive matches in defect.opensolaris.org not seem to relate yet&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/gman/2008/11/09/opensolaris-rc1-hits-the-streets/comment-page-1/#comment-448</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 05:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/gman/?p=628#comment-448</guid>
		<description>The new release is installing now! I love what I&#039;ve seen so far! Especially that sound works straight away now - I don&#039;t need OSS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new release is installing now! I love what I&#8217;ve seen so far! Especially that sound works straight away now &#8211; I don&#8217;t need OSS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  blogs.gnome.org/gman/2008/11/09/opensolaris-rc1-hits-the-streets/feed/ ) in 0.17125 seconds, on Feb 10th, 2012 at 11:05 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 11th, 2012 at 12:05 am UTC -->
