<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: State of OCR in Gnome</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/gnome-scan/2007/08/07/state-of-ocr-in-gnome/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/gnome-scan/2007/08/07/state-of-ocr-in-gnome/</link>
	<description>Make scanning as easy as printing for both users and developers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:50:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Étienne Bersac</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/gnome-scan/2007/08/07/state-of-ocr-in-gnome/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Étienne Bersac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 18:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/gnome-scan/2007/08/07/state-of-ocr-in-gnome/#comment-57</guid>
		<description>Hi Helmut,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Your comment on &quot;what for another engine&quot; is not alone. Article about Gnome Scan on Ars Technica and LinuxFR made similar feedback (but they where more about using tesseract instead of OCRopus - a non sense - or gocr).&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Kind regards,&lt;br/&gt;Étienne.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Helmut,</p>
<p>Your comment on &#8220;what for another engine&#8221; is not alone. Article about Gnome Scan on Ars Technica and LinuxFR made similar feedback (but they where more about using tesseract instead of OCRopus &#8211; a non sense &#8211; or gocr).</p>
<p>Kind regards,<br />Étienne.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/gnome-scan/2007/08/07/state-of-ocr-in-gnome/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 18:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/gnome-scan/2007/08/07/state-of-ocr-in-gnome/#comment-56</guid>
		<description>Hi,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;great news, thank you!! :)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This takes Gnome another step to the Desktop.&lt;br/&gt;Don&#039;t get me wrong: I&#039;m *very* happy with this command line tool provided by OCRshop, but I&#039;m not an usual user.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Have luck, best regards,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Helmut</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>great news, thank you!! <img src='http://blogs.gnome.org/gnome-scan/wp-content/mu-plugins/tango-smilies/tango/face-smile.png' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>This takes Gnome another step to the Desktop.<br />Don&#8217;t get me wrong: I&#8217;m *very* happy with this command line tool provided by OCRshop, but I&#8217;m not an usual user.</p>
<p>Have luck, best regards,</p>
<p>Helmut</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Étienne Bersac</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/gnome-scan/2007/08/07/state-of-ocr-in-gnome/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Étienne Bersac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 13:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/gnome-scan/2007/08/07/state-of-ocr-in-gnome/#comment-55</guid>
		<description>Hi,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Writing a wrapper won&#039;t help you much since using command line tool is a temporary experimental solution. As i said, i wish a real OCR API.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Regarding your request, i decided that i won&#039;t stick Gnome OCR to OCRopus. I should better provide a modular OCR layout for Gnome allowing to choose backend (just like Gnome Scan 0.5 do for scanner access and SANE). However, don&#039;t expect me to support each proprietary softwares. See my last post on Choosing an OCR system.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Kind regards,&lt;br/&gt;Étienne.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Writing a wrapper won&#8217;t help you much since using command line tool is a temporary experimental solution. As i said, i wish a real OCR API.</p>
<p>Regarding your request, i decided that i won&#8217;t stick Gnome OCR to OCRopus. I should better provide a modular OCR layout for Gnome allowing to choose backend (just like Gnome Scan 0.5 do for scanner access and SANE). However, don&#8217;t expect me to support each proprietary softwares. See my last post on Choosing an OCR system.</p>
<p>Kind regards,<br />Étienne.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/gnome-scan/2007/08/07/state-of-ocr-in-gnome/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 22:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/gnome-scan/2007/08/07/state-of-ocr-in-gnome/#comment-54</guid>
		<description>Sad, so I must write a wrapper in bash to fake ocr-shop as eg. gocr and search for another GUI tool.&lt;br/&gt;Bash is my only knowledge and I help normal users to use Linux.&lt;br/&gt;But every GPL OCR Software is &#039;very basic&#039; to recognize text. Try to compare OCR-Shop with Ocropus and you know what I mean. No normal user (&quot;from the other OS&quot;) accept this very minimalistic recognize results from a GPL program, if every sold scanner comes with a 100% better OCR software.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sad, so I must write a wrapper in bash to fake ocr-shop as eg. gocr and search for another GUI tool.<br />Bash is my only knowledge and I help normal users to use Linux.<br />But every GPL OCR Software is &#8216;very basic&#8217; to recognize text. Try to compare OCR-Shop with Ocropus and you know what I mean. No normal user (&#8220;from the other OS&#8221;) accept this very minimalistic recognize results from a GPL program, if every sold scanner comes with a 100% better OCR software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Étienne Bersac</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/gnome-scan/2007/08/07/state-of-ocr-in-gnome/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Étienne Bersac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 00:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/gnome-scan/2007/08/07/state-of-ocr-in-gnome/#comment-53</guid>
		<description>@anonymous 02:11:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Hi,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I won&#039;t write support for such software. They&#039;ll have to do it by their own, or one of their users.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Kind regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@anonymous 02:11:</p>
<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t write support for such software. They&#8217;ll have to do it by their own, or one of their users.</p>
<p>Kind regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/gnome-scan/2007/08/07/state-of-ocr-in-gnome/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 00:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/gnome-scan/2007/08/07/state-of-ocr-in-gnome/#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Please include support for OCR-Shop. This isn&#039;t GPL but the best OCR engine for Linux. Thanks!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;http://www.vividata.com/index.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please include support for OCR-Shop. This isn&#8217;t GPL but the best OCR engine for Linux. Thanks!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.vividata.com/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.vividata.com/index.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  blogs.gnome.org/gnome-scan/2007/08/07/state-of-ocr-in-gnome/feed/ ) in 1.21255 seconds, on Feb 11th, 2012 at 3:11 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 11th, 2012 at 4:11 am UTC -->
