<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SANE design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/gnome-scan/2008/01/23/sane-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/gnome-scan/2008/01/23/sane-design/</link>
	<description>Make scanning as easy as printing for both users and developers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:50:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pēteris Krišjānis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/gnome-scan/2008/01/23/sane-design/comment-page-1/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Pēteris Krišjānis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 18:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/gnome-scan/2008/01/23/sane-design/#comment-91</guid>
		<description>I fully support your idea about reworking SANE, as I have been very frequently plagued by very slow and buggy scanning. It is sad to hear that SANE 2 won&#039;t be that hero who will save us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fully support your idea about reworking SANE, as I have been very frequently plagued by very slow and buggy scanning. It is sad to hear that SANE 2 won&#8217;t be that hero who will save us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Étienne Bersac</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/gnome-scan/2008/01/23/sane-design/comment-page-1/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Étienne Bersac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/gnome-scan/2008/01/23/sane-design/#comment-90</guid>
		<description>@akaladis : see http://bugzilla.gnome.org/ .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@akaladis : see <a href="http://bugzilla.gnome.org/" rel="nofollow">http://bugzilla.gnome.org/</a> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akaladis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/gnome-scan/2008/01/23/sane-design/comment-page-1/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>akaladis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/gnome-scan/2008/01/23/sane-design/#comment-89</guid>
		<description>where do i file a bug?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>where do i file a bug?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Étienne Bersac</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/gnome-scan/2008/01/23/sane-design/comment-page-1/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>Étienne Bersac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 11:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/gnome-scan/2008/01/23/sane-design/#comment-88</guid>
		<description>Please file a bug, posting comment won&#039;t help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please file a bug, posting comment won&#8217;t help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akaladis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/gnome-scan/2008/01/23/sane-design/comment-page-1/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>akaladis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/gnome-scan/2008/01/23/sane-design/#comment-87</guid>
		<description>can we at least free memory between scans? for every 150 dpi page i scan, flegita climbs 5% on my memory. and mind you, that&#039;s 5% of 2gb! the only &#039;solution&#039; is to restart gnome-scan after every page i scan. and of course i haven&#039;t been able to do a scan at 1200dpi since i run out of memory and flegita is killed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can we at least free memory between scans? for every 150 dpi page i scan, flegita climbs 5% on my memory. and mind you, that&#8217;s 5% of 2gb! the only &#8216;solution&#8217; is to restart gnome-scan after every page i scan. and of course i haven&#8217;t been able to do a scan at 1200dpi since i run out of memory and flegita is killed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Étienne Bersac</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/gnome-scan/2008/01/23/sane-design/comment-page-1/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Étienne Bersac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 18:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/gnome-scan/2008/01/23/sane-design/#comment-84</guid>
		<description>Gegl is know to have memleaks i can&#039;t workaround from Gnome Scan.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Regards,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gegl is know to have memleaks i can&#8217;t workaround from Gnome Scan.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akaladis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/gnome-scan/2008/01/23/sane-design/comment-page-1/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>akaladis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 18:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/gnome-scan/2008/01/23/sane-design/#comment-83</guid>
		<description>speaking of future... i just noticed this:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;after doing a good few scans in a row (using the forward button) i noticed that flegita was using about 1gb of ram. as soon as i hit the stop button, everything went back to normal.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;this is on a gutsy desktop in sync with the gnome-scan ppa packages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>speaking of future&#8230; i just noticed this:</p>
<p>after doing a good few scans in a row (using the forward button) i noticed that flegita was using about 1gb of ram. as soon as i hit the stop button, everything went back to normal.</p>
<p>this is on a gutsy desktop in sync with the gnome-scan ppa packages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  blogs.gnome.org/gnome-scan/2008/01/23/sane-design/feed/ ) in 1.16307 seconds, on Feb 10th, 2012 at 7:44 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 10th, 2012 at 8:44 pm UTC -->
