<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No GNOME Scan 2.24</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/gnome-scan/2008/05/05/no-gnome-scan-224/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/gnome-scan/2008/05/05/no-gnome-scan-224/</link>
	<description>Make scanning as easy as printing for both users and developers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 11:50:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jones Lee</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/gnome-scan/2008/05/05/no-gnome-scan-224/comment-page-1/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>Jones Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 23:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/gnome-scan/2008/05/05/no-gnome-scan-224/#comment-131</guid>
		<description>I totally agreed. Why not still put it in GNOME 2.23, then if before the deadline and the package is not yet mature enough then we can push it out of the release set.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agreed. Why not still put it in GNOME 2.23, then if before the deadline and the package is not yet mature enough then we can push it out of the release set.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Étienne Bersac</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/gnome-scan/2008/05/05/no-gnome-scan-224/comment-page-1/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>Étienne Bersac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 06:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/gnome-scan/2008/05/05/no-gnome-scan-224/#comment-130</guid>
		<description>Hi,

You&#039;re right, but GIO API is stable. It&#039;s just a matter of implementing new features in GVFS.

Étienne.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right, but GIO API is stable. It&#8217;s just a matter of implementing new features in GVFS.</p>
<p>Étienne.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dr88dr88</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/gnome-scan/2008/05/05/no-gnome-scan-224/comment-page-1/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>dr88dr88</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 18:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/gnome-scan/2008/05/05/no-gnome-scan-224/#comment-129</guid>
		<description>If you where replacing a working tool i would say it is a good move but currently gnome has no scanning tool so something is better than nothing. By including the tool you will also attract more developers. GIO missed allot of futures a few month before release and allot of developers jump on board to help finessed it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you where replacing a working tool i would say it is a good move but currently gnome has no scanning tool so something is better than nothing. By including the tool you will also attract more developers. GIO missed allot of futures a few month before release and allot of developers jump on board to help finessed it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
