<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GNOME using waf?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2007/01/04/gnome-using-waf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2007/01/04/gnome-using-waf/</link>
	<description>Blog about geeky stuff</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 17:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2007/01/04/gnome-using-waf/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 20:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2007/01/04/gnome-using-waf/#comment-36</guid>
		<description>I hate autotools and I can safely say that they have raised the level of entry of new contributors. I was lost myself for a long time where all the m4 and autotools foo scared the shit out of me. I was thinking that I couldn&apos;t possible contribute without grokking all this (which I now know is totally untrue, since I&apos;m a deskbar maintainer :-)) I had a small flirt with QT4 back when it was originally released. It took me about 10 minutes to get going with the project/building tools related to this - I don&apos;t remember their names anymore, but I clearly remember thinking: "Wow - can things really be this easy?". I realize and appreciate that autotools has a lot of nifty things that make them great tools, I just really dislike working with them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate autotools and I can safely say that they have raised the level of entry of new contributors. I was lost myself for a long time where all the m4 and autotools foo scared the shit out of me. I was thinking that I couldn&apos;t possible contribute without grokking all this (which I now know is totally untrue, since I&apos;m a deskbar maintainer :-)) I had a small flirt with QT4 back when it was originally released. It took me about 10 minutes to get going with the project/building tools related to this - I don&apos;t remember their names anymore, but I clearly remember thinking: &#8220;Wow - can things really be this easy?&#8221;. I realize and appreciate that autotools has a lot of nifty things that make them great tools, I just really dislike working with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
