<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Creating a new battery profile</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2007/03/23/creating-a-new-battery-profile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2007/03/23/creating-a-new-battery-profile/</link>
	<description>Blog about geeky stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 09:38:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2007/03/23/creating-a-new-battery-profile/comment-page-1/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 22:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2007/03/23/creating-a-new-battery-profile/#comment-62</guid>
		<description>Ditch the popup.  They should &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/2006/11/01/922449.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;only be displayed when something happens that a user can respond to&lt;/a&gt; (Windows guidelines, but they&apos;re sensible). Balloon: &quot;Your battery meter is inaccurate&quot; User: &quot;So?&quot; Popups are great and all, but their use really needs to be strictly controlled.  I&apos;d hate to see Gnome end up like Windows is. Question: If you have accurate battery readings for one battery but not the other, can&apos;t you just ignore the second battery until you have good readings?  For example, suppose you can accurately predict that battery #1 is going to give you 2 hours of charge, but don&apos;t have enough information to predict battery #2 yet.  In this situation, &quot;2 hours&quot; is at least partially accurate, as you can predict that you will get at least 2 hours of running.  Or is prediction done over all batteries?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ditch the popup.  They should <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/2006/11/01/922449.aspx" rel="nofollow">only be displayed when something happens that a user can respond to</a> (Windows guidelines, but they&apos;re sensible). Balloon: &#8220;Your battery meter is inaccurate&#8221; User: &#8220;So?&#8221; Popups are great and all, but their use really needs to be strictly controlled.  I&apos;d hate to see Gnome end up like Windows is. Question: If you have accurate battery readings for one battery but not the other, can&apos;t you just ignore the second battery until you have good readings?  For example, suppose you can accurately predict that battery #1 is going to give you 2 hours of charge, but don&apos;t have enough information to predict battery #2 yet.  In this situation, &#8220;2 hours&#8221; is at least partially accurate, as you can predict that you will get at least 2 hours of running.  Or is prediction done over all batteries?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2007/03/23/creating-a-new-battery-profile/feed/ ) in 0.14013 seconds, on Feb 12th, 2012 at 4:10 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 12th, 2012 at 5:10 am UTC -->
