<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Backlight Brightness Fun</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2007/05/24/backlight-brightness-fun/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2007/05/24/backlight-brightness-fun/</link>
	<description>Blog about geeky stuff</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 23:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2007/05/24/backlight-brightness-fun/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 13:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2007/05/24/backlight-brightness-fun/#comment-83</guid>
		<description>&#62; Optionally using an integrated laptop webcam to sense ambient brightness Huh.  Don&apos;t they all do automatic exposure/brightness correction, and wouldn&apos;t that confound your test? - Chris.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; Optionally using an integrated laptop webcam to sense ambient brightness Huh.  Don&apos;t they all do automatic exposure/brightness correction, and wouldn&apos;t that confound your test? - Chris.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
