<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PackageKit status icon(s)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2007/08/22/packagekit-status-icons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2007/08/22/packagekit-status-icons/</link>
	<description>Blog about geeky stuff</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 10:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2007/08/22/packagekit-status-icons/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 01:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2007/08/22/packagekit-status-icons/#comment-108</guid>
		<description>Have you looked at the design of the Windows XP security updater?  It&apos;s pretty good in my opinion and we could do worse than emulate it. For example, displaying technical goo like "gtkhtml2" is: * not useful to people who don&apos;t know what it is * not useful to people who do - what is interesting is what changed (if I really care to look, not that I usually do)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you looked at the design of the Windows XP security updater?  It&apos;s pretty good in my opinion and we could do worse than emulate it. For example, displaying technical goo like &#8220;gtkhtml2&#8243; is: * not useful to people who don&apos;t know what it is * not useful to people who do - what is interesting is what changed (if I really care to look, not that I usually do)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
