<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Application database icons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2007/08/30/application-database-icons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2007/08/30/application-database-icons/</link>
	<description>Blog about geeky stuff</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 16:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2007/08/30/application-database-icons/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2007/08/30/application-database-icons/#comment-113</guid>
		<description>I think option 2 is actually not bad.  It requires someone maintain such a package, but it could be something that we even maintain between distros.  Common source version of the package that includes contributed desktops files and icons.  We can collectively maintain it, and to deal with package naming differences, include a mapping for package name per packaging system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think option 2 is actually not bad.  It requires someone maintain such a package, but it could be something that we even maintain between distros.  Common source version of the package that includes contributed desktops files and icons.  We can collectively maintain it, and to deal with package naming differences, include a mapping for package name per packaging system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
