<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flipping angry with Ubuntu</title>
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2007/11/14/flipping-angry-with-ubuntu/</link>
	<description>My fiancee is like Windows Vista: Looks pretty, difficult to understand and sometimes unpredictable...</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2007/11/14/flipping-angry-with-ubuntu/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 17:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2007/11/14/flipping-angry-with-ubuntu/#comment-139</guid>
		<description>Hi, You shouldn&apos;t generalise to the distro -- it all depends on your package&apos;s maintainer. I&apos;m a developer of Claws Mail, and we have a great, great Debian packager that actually forwards bugs upstream, gets patches merged when we accept them. Our Gentoo maintainer is great too. Both of them actually take part in the development process, hang around in our IRC channel and mailing-lists, etc. Our Redhat maintainer is also good at communicating with upstream. Packagers from other distros, though, range from average to very low. Our ubuntu maintainer, if there is one (we&apos;re not in Ubuntu&apos;s "main", that probably doesn&apos;t help), does crap - no forwarding bugs to upstream, not even reacting to them usually, fixes packaging scripts without understanding them and ending up with wrong dependencies, etc. I do think there are great maintainers at Ubuntu, only, not all of them are!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, You shouldn&apos;t generalise to the distro &#8212; it all depends on your package&apos;s maintainer. I&apos;m a developer of Claws Mail, and we have a great, great Debian packager that actually forwards bugs upstream, gets patches merged when we accept them. Our Gentoo maintainer is great too. Both of them actually take part in the development process, hang around in our IRC channel and mailing-lists, etc. Our Redhat maintainer is also good at communicating with upstream. Packagers from other distros, though, range from average to very low. Our ubuntu maintainer, if there is one (we&apos;re not in Ubuntu&apos;s &#8220;main&#8221;, that probably doesn&apos;t help), does crap - no forwarding bugs to upstream, not even reacting to them usually, fixes packaging scripts without understanding them and ending up with wrong dependencies, etc. I do think there are great maintainers at Ubuntu, only, not all of them are!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
