<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flipping angry with Ubuntu</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2007/11/14/flipping-angry-with-ubuntu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2007/11/14/flipping-angry-with-ubuntu/</link>
	<description>Blog about geeky stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 09:38:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2007/11/14/flipping-angry-with-ubuntu/comment-page-1/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 17:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2007/11/14/flipping-angry-with-ubuntu/#comment-139</guid>
		<description>Hi, You shouldn&apos;t generalise to the distro -- it all depends on your package&apos;s maintainer. I&apos;m a developer of Claws Mail, and we have a great, great Debian packager that actually forwards bugs upstream, gets patches merged when we accept them. Our Gentoo maintainer is great too. Both of them actually take part in the development process, hang around in our IRC channel and mailing-lists, etc. Our Redhat maintainer is also good at communicating with upstream. Packagers from other distros, though, range from average to very low. Our ubuntu maintainer, if there is one (we&apos;re not in Ubuntu&apos;s &quot;main&quot;, that probably doesn&apos;t help), does crap - no forwarding bugs to upstream, not even reacting to them usually, fixes packaging scripts without understanding them and ending up with wrong dependencies, etc. I do think there are great maintainers at Ubuntu, only, not all of them are!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, You shouldn&apos;t generalise to the distro &#8212; it all depends on your package&apos;s maintainer. I&apos;m a developer of Claws Mail, and we have a great, great Debian packager that actually forwards bugs upstream, gets patches merged when we accept them. Our Gentoo maintainer is great too. Both of them actually take part in the development process, hang around in our IRC channel and mailing-lists, etc. Our Redhat maintainer is also good at communicating with upstream. Packagers from other distros, though, range from average to very low. Our ubuntu maintainer, if there is one (we&apos;re not in Ubuntu&apos;s &#8220;main&#8221;, that probably doesn&apos;t help), does crap &#8211; no forwarding bugs to upstream, not even reacting to them usually, fixes packaging scripts without understanding them and ending up with wrong dependencies, etc. I do think there are great maintainers at Ubuntu, only, not all of them are!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2007/11/14/flipping-angry-with-ubuntu/feed/ ) in 0.13261 seconds, on Feb 12th, 2012 at 4:37 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 12th, 2012 at 5:37 am UTC -->
