<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PackageKit and Debian</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2008/04/14/packagekit-and-debian/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2008/04/14/packagekit-and-debian/</link>
	<description>Blog about geeky stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:10:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mon programme pour Intrepid &#171; Informatique de Julien</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2008/04/14/packagekit-and-debian/comment-page-1/#comment-321</link>
		<dc:creator>Mon programme pour Intrepid &#171; Informatique de Julien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 14:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2008/04/14/packagekit-and-debian/#comment-321</guid>
		<description>[...] (mise à jour) et gnome-packagekit (même si son intégration avec apt/dpkg fait [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (mise à jour) et gnome-packagekit (même si son intégration avec apt/dpkg fait [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2008/04/14/packagekit-and-debian/comment-page-1/#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2008/04/14/packagekit-and-debian/#comment-164</guid>
		<description>well, power to you. As you have probably noticed in that blog post, most people do not agree with jason.  Having weighten up all the facts I personally are fully behind you, also. Just seems to be a bug in DPKG&apos;s, so I do not really understand why PK should work around it when fixing it up and the packages is a much cleaner and better way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, power to you. As you have probably noticed in that blog post, most people do not agree with jason.  Having weighten up all the facts I personally are fully behind you, also. Just seems to be a bug in DPKG&apos;s, so I do not really understand why PK should work around it when fixing it up and the packages is a much cleaner and better way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
