<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: latency-policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2008/07/01/latency-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2008/07/01/latency-policy/</link>
	<description>Blog about geeky stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:54:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mark gross</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2008/07/01/latency-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-530</link>
		<dc:creator>mark gross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 18:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2008/07/01/latency-policy/#comment-530</guid>
		<description>I agree latency is a key to power / policy definition.  Have you looked at PM_QOS? http://free-electrons.com/articles/conferences/elc2008-report#gross 

Will you make it to the Plumbers confrence?
I think we should talk.

--mgross</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree latency is a key to power / policy definition.  Have you looked at PM_QOS? <a href="http://free-electrons.com/articles/conferences/elc2008-report#gross" rel="nofollow">http://free-electrons.com/articles/conferences/elc2008-report#gross</a> </p>
<p>Will you make it to the Plumbers confrence?<br />
I think we should talk.</p>
<p>&#8211;mgross</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hughsie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2008/07/01/latency-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-529</link>
		<dc:creator>hughsie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2008/07/01/latency-policy/#comment-529</guid>
		<description>Review request here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455149</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Review request here: <a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455149" rel="nofollow">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455149</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nona</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2008/07/01/latency-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-485</link>
		<dc:creator>nona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 12:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2008/07/01/latency-policy/#comment-485</guid>
		<description>Is this a set of knobs to allow the user to define what policy he/she wants? Or is it a set of API&#039;s for applications to tell the system what latency they need?

I hope it&#039;s the latter, because giving the users questions that they&#039;re not able to answer, or where the answer is different depending on what they&#039;re doing at that moment is not the way to go. I suspect however you mean the former, since you mention: &quot;We really don’t need to (or want to) export all these settings to the UI as most of them are pretty meaningless to 99.99% of users.&quot;

Anyway - my opinion is in no small part due to this eye-opening post: http://mjg59.livejournal.com/92880.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this a set of knobs to allow the user to define what policy he/she wants? Or is it a set of API&#8217;s for applications to tell the system what latency they need?</p>
<p>I hope it&#8217;s the latter, because giving the users questions that they&#8217;re not able to answer, or where the answer is different depending on what they&#8217;re doing at that moment is not the way to go. I suspect however you mean the former, since you mention: &#8220;We really don’t need to (or want to) export all these settings to the UI as most of them are pretty meaningless to 99.99% of users.&#8221;</p>
<p>Anyway &#8211; my opinion is in no small part due to this eye-opening post: <a href="http://mjg59.livejournal.com/92880.html" rel="nofollow">http://mjg59.livejournal.com/92880.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
