Comments on: T61 hda_codec http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2008/09/05/t61-hda_codec/ Blog about geeky stuff Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:10:33 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: hughsie http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2008/09/05/t61-hda_codec/comment-page-1/#comment-553 hughsie Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:01:13 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2008/09/05/t61-hda_codec/#comment-553 Rob, this is the sort of testing we do on RHEL. Fedora just isn't going to have the same level of regression testing as that. RHEL is rock stable, Fedora is more bleeding edge. Rob, this is the sort of testing we do on RHEL. Fedora just isn’t going to have the same level of regression testing as that. RHEL is rock stable, Fedora is more bleeding edge.

]]> By: Rob J. Caskey http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2008/09/05/t61-hda_codec/comment-page-1/#comment-552 Rob J. Caskey Fri, 05 Sep 2008 12:56:19 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2008/09/05/t61-hda_codec/#comment-552 I'm going to have to say that this sort of thing is a major black-eye for Linux on the desktop. Why is there not a big room somewhere with a bunch of machines being unit-tested before each patch of a kernel or an applicable subsystem? I supposed that was the sort of thing Redhat was supposed to be doing to differentiate itself from Ubuntu, Mandrake, and the other less-well capitalized distros. --Rob I’m going to have to say that this sort of thing is a major black-eye for Linux on the desktop. Why is there not a big room somewhere with a bunch of machines being unit-tested before each patch of a kernel or an applicable subsystem? I supposed that was the sort of thing Redhat was supposed to be doing to differentiate itself from Ubuntu, Mandrake, and the other less-well capitalized distros.

–Rob

]]>