Comments on: PackageKit self checks http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2008/09/23/packagekit-self-checks/ Blog about geeky stuff Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:10:33 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Zack Cerza http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2008/09/23/packagekit-self-checks/comment-page-1/#comment-707 Zack Cerza Thu, 25 Sep 2008 18:22:40 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=256#comment-707 'Hard to use' in what way? Ping me and I'll see if I can help. ‘Hard to use’ in what way? Ping me and I’ll see if I can help.

]]> By: Stu http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2008/09/23/packagekit-self-checks/comment-page-1/#comment-706 Stu Tue, 23 Sep 2008 20:34:20 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=256#comment-706 PackageKit for windows... any plan to put it on windows. It could be integrated with open source programs and we could update them through there, life could be sweet :) PackageKit for windows… any plan to put it on windows. It could be integrated with open source programs and we could update them through there, life could be sweet :)

]]> By: fraggle http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2008/09/23/packagekit-self-checks/comment-page-1/#comment-705 fraggle Tue, 23 Sep 2008 15:16:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=256#comment-705 Wow, I wrote that really badly. "I’ve actually had bugs that were masked because the code wasn’t testing everything that I thought it was." should actually read "I've actually had bugs that were masked because the tests weren't exercising all of the code that I thought they were". Wow, I wrote that really badly. “I’ve actually had bugs that were masked because the code wasn’t testing everything that I thought it was.” should actually read “I’ve actually had bugs that were masked because the tests weren’t exercising all of the code that I thought they were”.

]]> By: fraggle http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2008/09/23/packagekit-self-checks/comment-page-1/#comment-704 fraggle Tue, 23 Sep 2008 15:14:12 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=256#comment-704 Are you doing any code coverage analysis? I find it's very useful for checking that you're really testing everything you think you are. I've actually had bugs that were masked because the code wasn't testing everything that I thought it was. I wrote a bit recently about testing one of my own projects: http://c-algorithms.sourceforge.net/testing.html Are you doing any code coverage analysis? I find it’s very useful for checking that you’re really testing everything you think you are. I’ve actually had bugs that were masked because the code wasn’t testing everything that I thought it was.

I wrote a bit recently about testing one of my own projects:
http://c-algorithms.sourceforge.net/testing.html

]]> By: Wouter http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2008/09/23/packagekit-self-checks/comment-page-1/#comment-703 Wouter Tue, 23 Sep 2008 13:57:45 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=256#comment-703 Perhaps ldtp can be useful? Perhaps ldtp can be useful?

]]> By: Sandy http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2008/09/23/packagekit-self-checks/comment-page-1/#comment-702 Sandy Tue, 23 Sep 2008 12:48:16 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=256#comment-702 You my have better luck with the newer (dogtail-inspired) Strongwind: http://medsphere.org/community/project/strongwind We use it extensively on the mono-a11y team. You my have better luck with the newer (dogtail-inspired) Strongwind:

http://medsphere.org/community/project/strongwind

We use it extensively on the mono-a11y team.

]]>