Comments on: [CVE-2008-4311] DBus 1.2.6 http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2008/12/08/cve-2008-4311-dbus-126/ Blog about geeky stuff Sun, 29 Jan 2012 09:38:55 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Alena http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2008/12/08/cve-2008-4311-dbus-126/comment-page-1/#comment-885 Alena Sat, 13 Dec 2008 05:28:35 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=284#comment-885 I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don't know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often. Alena http://www.smallbusinessavenues.com I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don’t know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.

Alena

http://www.smallbusinessavenues.com

]]> By: hughsie http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2008/12/08/cve-2008-4311-dbus-126/comment-page-1/#comment-877 hughsie Fri, 12 Dec 2008 12:06:30 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=284#comment-877 al, sure, I don't doubt that. I'm not angry at the people who caused this problem, as I might make the same sort of mistake myself in the future. Fedora is fast moving, but I agree this sort of bug should not happen. al, sure, I don’t doubt that. I’m not angry at the people who caused this problem, as I might make the same sort of mistake myself in the future. Fedora is fast moving, but I agree this sort of bug should not happen.

]]> By: al http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2008/12/08/cve-2008-4311-dbus-126/comment-page-1/#comment-876 al Fri, 12 Dec 2008 04:27:20 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=284#comment-876 Fedora 10 "state-of-the-art" image was considerable scratched with such fact. Fedora 10 “state-of-the-art” image was considerable scratched with such fact.

]]> By: hughsie http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2008/12/08/cve-2008-4311-dbus-126/comment-page-1/#comment-875 hughsie Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:44:53 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=284#comment-875 Official updates pushed to stable tonight: F9: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-11157 F10: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-11078 Official updates pushed to stable tonight:

F9: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-11157
F10: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-11078

]]> By: fedora10user http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2008/12/08/cve-2008-4311-dbus-126/comment-page-1/#comment-874 fedora10user Wed, 10 Dec 2008 03:50:07 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=284#comment-874 guys .. duh this update ducked my fedora 10 Cambridge box :S please if you knew any updates let us know ... thanks .. guys .. duh
this update ducked my fedora 10 Cambridge box :S
please if you knew any updates let us know …
thanks ..

]]> By: anonymous fedora user http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2008/12/08/cve-2008-4311-dbus-126/comment-page-1/#comment-873 anonymous fedora user Tue, 09 Dec 2008 15:19:24 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=284#comment-873 Rather inexcusable patch management from the Fedora project. Like people ask above: do you really push patches to non-rawhide without actually testing them? Inconceivable. Hopefully the aftermath discussion leads to some practical resolution; otherwise another nail in the coffin of Fedora's so-called "quality assurance". Rather inexcusable patch management from the Fedora project.

Like people ask above: do you really push patches to non-rawhide without actually testing them?
Inconceivable.

Hopefully the aftermath discussion leads to some practical resolution; otherwise another nail in the coffin of Fedora’s so-called “quality assurance”.

]]> By: hughsie http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2008/12/08/cve-2008-4311-dbus-126/comment-page-1/#comment-872 hughsie Tue, 09 Dec 2008 09:50:35 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=284#comment-872 There's an update pending that should work here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/PackageKit-0.3.12-1.fc10,gnome-packagekit-0.3.12-1.fc10,kpackagekit-0.3.1-9.fc10 There’s an update pending that should work here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/PackageKit-0.3.12-1.fc10,gnome-packagekit-0.3.12-1.fc10,kpackagekit-0.3.1-9.fc10

]]> By: Tom http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2008/12/08/cve-2008-4311-dbus-126/comment-page-1/#comment-871 Tom Tue, 09 Dec 2008 07:52:23 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=284#comment-871 Wow, it must suck to be you :P (Or a Fedora user like me :P ) Will this fuck-up be fixable with just another update?? Wow, it must suck to be you :P

(Or a Fedora user like me :P )

Will this fuck-up be fixable with just another update??

]]> By: Lunduke.com » Fedora update breaks… Fedora http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2008/12/08/cve-2008-4311-dbus-126/comment-page-1/#comment-870 Lunduke.com » Fedora update breaks… Fedora Tue, 09 Dec 2008 03:25:45 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=284#comment-870 [...] Richard Hughes blog: “Please don’t yet update DBus for CVE-2008-4311. It’s known to break PackageKit, cups, [...] [...] Richard Hughes blog: “Please don’t yet update DBus for CVE-2008-4311. It’s known to break PackageKit, cups, [...]

]]> By: Adam Williamson http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2008/12/08/cve-2008-4311-dbus-126/comment-page-1/#comment-868 Adam Williamson Mon, 08 Dec 2008 17:11:12 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=284#comment-868 Why don't you guys just pull the update? Why don’t you guys just pull the update?

]]>