<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: gnome-power-manager and processor wakeups</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/01/30/gnome-power-manager-and-processor-wakeups/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/01/30/gnome-power-manager-and-processor-wakeups/</link>
	<description>Blog about geeky stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 09:38:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abbas K</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/01/30/gnome-power-manager-and-processor-wakeups/comment-page-1/#comment-1005</link>
		<dc:creator>Abbas K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 06:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=310#comment-1005</guid>
		<description>I just hope if it is put into gsm that it is toggleable and not shown in the default config. would be a nice plus for developers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just hope if it is put into gsm that it is toggleable and not shown in the default config. would be a nice plus for developers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bash</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/01/30/gnome-power-manager-and-processor-wakeups/comment-page-1/#comment-1004</link>
		<dc:creator>bash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=310#comment-1004</guid>
		<description>Now if someone would make a GUI like that for nethogs as well and integrate it with gnome-system-monitor I would be completly happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now if someone would make a GUI like that for nethogs as well and integrate it with gnome-system-monitor I would be completly happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Lovaton</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/01/30/gnome-power-manager-and-processor-wakeups/comment-page-1/#comment-1003</link>
		<dc:creator>William Lovaton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 23:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=310#comment-1003</guid>
		<description>Richard, this is great.  I always wanted something like this since powertop came out.

I have just a little suggestion: Develop a panel applet that show the wake ups with the same colors as powertop does and may be the actual number: Red when it&#039;s too high, yellow when it&#039;s normal and green when it&#039;s very low.

Great work!.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard, this is great.  I always wanted something like this since powertop came out.</p>
<p>I have just a little suggestion: Develop a panel applet that show the wake ups with the same colors as powertop does and may be the actual number: Red when it&#8217;s too high, yellow when it&#8217;s normal and green when it&#8217;s very low.</p>
<p>Great work!.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hughsie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/01/30/gnome-power-manager-and-processor-wakeups/comment-page-1/#comment-1002</link>
		<dc:creator>hughsie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 22:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=310#comment-1002</guid>
		<description>Mathias, as soon as you do short term hacky workarounds, people expect the functionality to be there in future releases. It&#039;s as much work doing things properly in the kernel as bodging things in a GUI. Out of interest, what suggestion in powertop causes the biggest drop in power consumption?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mathias, as soon as you do short term hacky workarounds, people expect the functionality to be there in future releases. It&#8217;s as much work doing things properly in the kernel as bodging things in a GUI. Out of interest, what suggestion in powertop causes the biggest drop in power consumption?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathias Hasselmann</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/01/30/gnome-power-manager-and-processor-wakeups/comment-page-1/#comment-1001</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathias Hasselmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 19:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=310#comment-1001</guid>
		<description>&gt; We are not going to offer the suggestions like powertop —
&gt; i would prefer to just fix the kernel drivers and make all this stuff “just work”.

Short term it still makes sense to provide suggestions: Without applying any powertop suggestions my notebook runs on batteries for only 2 hours, after applying the suggestions I get up to 5.5 hours. Quite a difference, I&#039;d say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; We are not going to offer the suggestions like powertop —<br />
&gt; i would prefer to just fix the kernel drivers and make all this stuff “just work”.</p>
<p>Short term it still makes sense to provide suggestions: Without applying any powertop suggestions my notebook runs on batteries for only 2 hours, after applying the suggestions I get up to 5.5 hours. Quite a difference, I&#8217;d say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/01/30/gnome-power-manager-and-processor-wakeups/comment-page-1/#comment-1000</link>
		<dc:creator>Emilio Pozuelo Monfort</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 18:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=310#comment-1000</guid>
		<description>Very nice. And I agree with you wrt the suggestions</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice. And I agree with you wrt the suggestions</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hughsie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/01/30/gnome-power-manager-and-processor-wakeups/comment-page-1/#comment-999</link>
		<dc:creator>hughsie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 10:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=310#comment-999</guid>
		<description>We are not going to offer the suggestions like powertop -- i would prefer to just fix the kernel drivers and make all this stuff &quot;just work&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are not going to offer the suggestions like powertop &#8212; i would prefer to just fix the kernel drivers and make all this stuff &#8220;just work&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bertrand</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/01/30/gnome-power-manager-and-processor-wakeups/comment-page-1/#comment-998</link>
		<dc:creator>Bertrand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 09:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=310#comment-998</guid>
		<description>I think that this is the part I like the most in modern Linux systems. GUIs for everything. It&#039;s about time to have tools like this one if you want to call yourself a &quot;modern operating system&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that this is the part I like the most in modern Linux systems. GUIs for everything. It&#8217;s about time to have tools like this one if you want to call yourself a &#8220;modern operating system&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/01/30/gnome-power-manager-and-processor-wakeups/comment-page-1/#comment-997</link>
		<dc:creator>Johan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 00:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=310#comment-997</guid>
		<description>I agree with Nathan. It would be great if this could have something similar to the powertop powersaving suggestions, but with persistence. Presumably by poking at g-p-m settings/profiles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Nathan. It would be great if this could have something similar to the powertop powersaving suggestions, but with persistence. Presumably by poking at g-p-m settings/profiles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Y</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/01/30/gnome-power-manager-and-processor-wakeups/comment-page-1/#comment-996</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Y</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 23:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=310#comment-996</guid>
		<description>My biggest wish is a way to &quot;package&quot; actions I apply in powertop; why do I have to press &quot;S&quot;, &quot;K&quot;, etc every time to enable USB suspend, kill something or other, etc.  I&#039;d like to say &quot;you know, do this every time I go on battery&quot; (or present me with a notification popup and ask if I&#039;d like to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My biggest wish is a way to &#8220;package&#8221; actions I apply in powertop; why do I have to press &#8220;S&#8221;, &#8220;K&#8221;, etc every time to enable USB suspend, kill something or other, etc.  I&#8217;d like to say &#8220;you know, do this every time I go on battery&#8221; (or present me with a notification popup and ask if I&#8217;d like to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/01/30/gnome-power-manager-and-processor-wakeups/feed/ ) in 1.17366 seconds, on Feb 11th, 2012 at 4:44 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 11th, 2012 at 5:44 am UTC -->
