<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The next update viewer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/03/17/the-next-update-viewer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/03/17/the-next-update-viewer/</link>
	<description>Blog about geeky stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 09:38:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chicha</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/03/17/the-next-update-viewer/comment-page-1/#comment-1088</link>
		<dc:creator>Chicha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 20:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=325#comment-1088</guid>
		<description>Hi !

I like the new UI a lot :-)
Congratulation for the good work !

I am not sure it was stated be don&#039;t you think that a &#039;cancel&#039; or &#039;don&#039;t install&#039; button could be put beside the &#039;install updates&#039; button ?
Explicit is better than implicite : I prefer a button with a label indicating it won&#039;t install anything instead of closing the window and pray that it won&#039;t install anything ...

Thanks again for the great job !
Cheers,
Chicha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi !</p>
<p>I like the new UI a lot <img src='http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/wp-content/mu-plugins/tango-smilies/tango/face-smile.png' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Congratulation for the good work !</p>
<p>I am not sure it was stated be don&#8217;t you think that a &#8216;cancel&#8217; or &#8216;don&#8217;t install&#8217; button could be put beside the &#8216;install updates&#8217; button ?<br />
Explicit is better than implicite : I prefer a button with a label indicating it won&#8217;t install anything instead of closing the window and pray that it won&#8217;t install anything &#8230;</p>
<p>Thanks again for the great job !<br />
Cheers,<br />
Chicha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruth</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/03/17/the-next-update-viewer/comment-page-1/#comment-1087</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 03:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=325#comment-1087</guid>
		<description>I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don&#039;t know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.

Ruth

http://laptopmessengerbag.info</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don&#8217;t know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.</p>
<p>Ruth</p>
<p><a href="http://laptopmessengerbag.info" rel="nofollow">http://laptopmessengerbag.info</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/03/17/the-next-update-viewer/comment-page-1/#comment-1086</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=325#comment-1086</guid>
		<description>It shows download size! Yes!

My only gripe: I&#039;d like to see what version the update replaces. Maybe a &quot;Replaces: foo 1.2-3&quot; line inserted at the top of the description box?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It shows download size! Yes!</p>
<p>My only gripe: I&#8217;d like to see what version the update replaces. Maybe a &#8220;Replaces: foo 1.2-3&#8243; line inserted at the top of the description box?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gigi</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/03/17/the-next-update-viewer/comment-page-1/#comment-1085</link>
		<dc:creator>Gigi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 18:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=325#comment-1085</guid>
		<description>It would be nice and vastly simple if the information part is hidden by default. There should be a small drop-down arrow which when clicked should show the text in the text area. This could be an acceptable compromise between being simple yet providing the information.


Optionally, a checkbox saying &quot;Show stable updates only&quot; would be good too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be nice and vastly simple if the information part is hidden by default. There should be a small drop-down arrow which when clicked should show the text in the text area. This could be an acceptable compromise between being simple yet providing the information.</p>
<p>Optionally, a checkbox saying &#8220;Show stable updates only&#8221; would be good too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: belegdol</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/03/17/the-next-update-viewer/comment-page-1/#comment-1084</link>
		<dc:creator>belegdol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=325#comment-1084</guid>
		<description>It doesn&#039;t fit on a 800x600 screen, which is the biggest you can have for kvm guest for now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t fit on a 800&#215;600 screen, which is the biggest you can have for kvm guest for now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bash</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/03/17/the-next-update-viewer/comment-page-1/#comment-1083</link>
		<dc:creator>bash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=325#comment-1083</guid>
		<description>I agree with Micheal in that the text should be put in an expandable/hideable Details area. By default it should be minimised. And it should remember it&#039;s state, so that you do not need to expand/hide it again for each new update you are look at. Also it should expand to fixed height for every update. You should be able to change it yourself but the textfield shouldn move around just because the text description is longer or shorter.

As for making the text details + links more readable, why don&#039;t you split it up in a 2-pane view like it is for the add/remove software window. On the left would be the changelog or description what this update does (including if you need to restart). In the right pane would be first the date (Issued: 28 Nov 09) below that in a new line the Arch and then below that the links to all related Bugzilla entries (Something along these lines:
Related bugs:
Gnome #345262
Freedesktop #159845
Fedora #243523)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Micheal in that the text should be put in an expandable/hideable Details area. By default it should be minimised. And it should remember it&#8217;s state, so that you do not need to expand/hide it again for each new update you are look at. Also it should expand to fixed height for every update. You should be able to change it yourself but the textfield shouldn move around just because the text description is longer or shorter.</p>
<p>As for making the text details + links more readable, why don&#8217;t you split it up in a 2-pane view like it is for the add/remove software window. On the left would be the changelog or description what this update does (including if you need to restart). In the right pane would be first the date (Issued: 28 Nov 09) below that in a new line the Arch and then below that the links to all related Bugzilla entries (Something along these lines:<br />
Related bugs :<br />
<a href='http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345262' class='bug-link bug-link-gnome'>Gnome #345262</a><br />
<a href='https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159845' class='bug-link bug-link-freedesktop'>Freedesktop #159845</a><br />
<a href='https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243523' class='bug-link bug-link-fedora'>Fedora #243523</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JojoMan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/03/17/the-next-update-viewer/comment-page-1/#comment-1082</link>
		<dc:creator>JojoMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 23:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=325#comment-1082</guid>
		<description>how about &quot;A restart should be performed after this update.&quot; This implies you can still use the old kernel, and that you &quot;should&quot; restart but that it&#039;s not mandatory a la windows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how about &#8220;A restart should be performed after this update.&#8221; This implies you can still use the old kernel, and that you &#8220;should&#8221; restart but that it&#8217;s not mandatory a la windows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JojoMan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/03/17/the-next-update-viewer/comment-page-1/#comment-1081</link>
		<dc:creator>JojoMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 23:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=325#comment-1081</guid>
		<description>You should do it like this (just my 2c). with closed being the default.

Example: http://drop.io/swtnexd</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should do it like this (just my 2c). with closed being the default.</p>
<p>Example: <a href="http://drop.io/swtnexd" rel="nofollow">http://drop.io/swtnexd</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MadsRH</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/03/17/the-next-update-viewer/comment-page-1/#comment-1080</link>
		<dc:creator>MadsRH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 23:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=325#comment-1080</guid>
		<description>Looks great! Keep up the good work :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks great! Keep up the good work <img src='http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/wp-content/mu-plugins/tango-smilies/tango/face-smile.png' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DDD</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/03/17/the-next-update-viewer/comment-page-1/#comment-1079</link>
		<dc:creator>DDD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=325#comment-1079</guid>
		<description>Is there really any value in having the update UI popping up constantly?  I don&#039;t think that I have ever done anything other than click &quot;Install Updates&quot; on it.

It would be useful to have a &quot;Don&#039;t bother asking me again &#039;coz I don&#039;t understand this stuff anyway, just patch my machine for me&quot; checkbox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there really any value in having the update UI popping up constantly?  I don&#8217;t think that I have ever done anything other than click &#8220;Install Updates&#8221; on it.</p>
<p>It would be useful to have a &#8220;Don&#8217;t bother asking me again &#8216;coz I don&#8217;t understand this stuff anyway, just patch my machine for me&#8221; checkbox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/03/17/the-next-update-viewer/feed/ ) in 1.17391 seconds, on Feb 10th, 2012 at 10:33 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 10th, 2012 at 11:33 pm UTC -->
