<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does your project use PackageKit?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/06/04/does-your-project-use-packagekit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/06/04/does-your-project-use-packagekit/</link>
	<description>Blog about geeky stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 09:38:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Hughes: Does your project use PackageKit? &#124; Full-Linux.com</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/06/04/does-your-project-use-packagekit/comment-page-1/#comment-1235</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Hughes: Does your project use PackageKit? &#124; Full-Linux.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=350#comment-1235</guid>
		<description>[...] related to your search Richard Hughes: Does your project use PackageKit? is now available in this link&#8230;:         News [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] related to your search Richard Hughes: Does your project use PackageKit? is now available in this link&#8230;:         News [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rtaycher</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/06/04/does-your-project-use-packagekit/comment-page-1/#comment-1218</link>
		<dc:creator>rtaycher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 14:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=350#comment-1218</guid>
		<description>Maybe he means he doesn&#039;t like the GUI?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe he means he doesn&#8217;t like the GUI?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hughsie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/06/04/does-your-project-use-packagekit/comment-page-1/#comment-1217</link>
		<dc:creator>hughsie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 11:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=350#comment-1217</guid>
		<description>&gt;the new interfaces just don’t go well with me

What troubles you? The fact that the session interface is synchronous or the fact there is a new API? Just curious...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>the new interfaces just don’t go well with me</p>
<p>What troubles you? The fact that the session interface is synchronous or the fact there is a new API? Just curious&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vadim</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/06/04/does-your-project-use-packagekit/comment-page-1/#comment-1216</link>
		<dc:creator>Vadim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 11:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=350#comment-1216</guid>
		<description>The only thing I&#039;m liking about PackageKit is the application intergration. The new interfaces, unfortunately, just don&#039;t go well with me at all nor the idea behind them.

Will be an application user once it makes its way in Ubuntu.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only thing I&#8217;m liking about PackageKit is the application intergration. The new interfaces, unfortunately, just don&#8217;t go well with me at all nor the idea behind them.</p>
<p>Will be an application user once it makes its way in Ubuntu.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hughsie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/06/04/does-your-project-use-packagekit/comment-page-1/#comment-1214</link>
		<dc:creator>hughsie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 15:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=350#comment-1214</guid>
		<description>@Craig:
Yes, end user applications would use the session API (or system if the want ultimate control) -- see http://www.packagekit.org/pk-faq.html#session-methods for more details.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Craig:<br />
Yes, end user applications would use the session API (or system if the want ultimate control) &#8212; see <a href="http://www.packagekit.org/pk-faq.html#session-methods" rel="nofollow">http://www.packagekit.org/pk-faq.html#session-methods</a> for more details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/06/04/does-your-project-use-packagekit/comment-page-1/#comment-1213</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 15:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=350#comment-1213</guid>
		<description>Are distributions the only users of PackageKit or would we expect end user applications to use it to make it easier to install theme&#039;s, add-on&#039;s, or related software?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are distributions the only users of PackageKit or would we expect end user applications to use it to make it easier to install theme&#8217;s, add-on&#8217;s, or related software?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/06/04/does-your-project-use-packagekit/comment-page-1/#comment-1212</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 13:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=350#comment-1212</guid>
		<description>Whoa, that was fast, thanks! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoa, that was fast, thanks! <img src='http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/wp-content/mu-plugins/tango-smilies/tango/face-wink.png' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hughsie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/06/04/does-your-project-use-packagekit/comment-page-1/#comment-1211</link>
		<dc:creator>hughsie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 13:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=350#comment-1211</guid>
		<description>&gt;perhaps it’ll be available a bit later

I&#039;ve refreshed the public pages, and it&#039;s available here: http://www.packagekit.org/pk-users.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>perhaps it’ll be available a bit later</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve refreshed the public pages, and it&#8217;s available here: <a href="http://www.packagekit.org/pk-users.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.packagekit.org/pk-users.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/06/04/does-your-project-use-packagekit/comment-page-1/#comment-1210</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 12:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=350#comment-1210</guid>
		<description>Sounds cool, however I&#039;d like to see where the list is, perhaps it&#039;ll be available a bit later?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds cool, however I&#8217;d like to see where the list is, perhaps it&#8217;ll be available a bit later?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul W. Frields</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/06/04/does-your-project-use-packagekit/comment-page-1/#comment-1209</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul W. Frields</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 12:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=350#comment-1209</guid>
		<description>I like PackageKit, and I want everyone else to know why. I recently requested that the Fedora Docs team adjust our software management guide to put PackageKit usage up front, and save advice on yum for specific backend chapters concerning configuration. I still run yum frequently out of habit, but if I were directing new users I would have no qualms about having them choose the PK applications from the menu and have at it. Certainly there&#039;s still a ways to go to get to the point of users not needing to know details like package names, but for now PK is still, for my book, the most friendly, useful, and freedesktop-compliant (and software freedom loving) system out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like PackageKit, and I want everyone else to know why. I recently requested that the Fedora Docs team adjust our software management guide to put PackageKit usage up front, and save advice on yum for specific backend chapters concerning configuration. I still run yum frequently out of habit, but if I were directing new users I would have no qualms about having them choose the PK applications from the menu and have at it. Certainly there&#8217;s still a ways to go to get to the point of users not needing to know details like package names, but for now PK is still, for my book, the most friendly, useful, and freedesktop-compliant (and software freedom loving) system out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/06/04/does-your-project-use-packagekit/feed/ ) in 0.42700 seconds, on Feb 11th, 2012 at 6:05 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 11th, 2012 at 7:05 am UTC -->
