<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ASUS EEE 900A</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/06/09/asus-eee-900a/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/06/09/asus-eee-900a/</link>
	<description>Blog about geeky stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:10:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: davidscott12345</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/06/09/asus-eee-900a/comment-page-1/#comment-1248</link>
		<dc:creator>davidscott12345</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=353#comment-1248</guid>
		<description>I just  got a 900a.  Our what WOOT.com calls a 900a.  When I called ASUS tech support about the specs of a 900a they where not sure why my new system did not have a webcam.  They tracked the serial number and in fact this is an OEM product for Best Buy.  It  is based on their standard 900a but is less as they removed the camera.  They could not tell me what else is different from their standard spec.  Buyer be ware...avoid WOOT.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just  got a 900a.  Our what WOOT.com calls a 900a.  When I called ASUS tech support about the specs of a 900a they where not sure why my new system did not have a webcam.  They tracked the serial number and in fact this is an OEM product for Best Buy.  It  is based on their standard 900a but is less as they removed the camera.  They could not tell me what else is different from their standard spec.  Buyer be ware&#8230;avoid WOOT.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Richardson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/06/09/asus-eee-900a/comment-page-1/#comment-1240</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Richardson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 09:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=353#comment-1240</guid>
		<description>Hey Hughsie, 

Personally i went for the aspire one with netbook remix, everything works, pretty quick and best of all no moving parts so can take a lot of abuse. The atom is nice and the speed of the SSD isnt really an issue.
Also get in touch! wanna pick your brains! and congrats as well if you didnt get my other msgs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Hughsie, </p>
<p>Personally i went for the aspire one with netbook remix, everything works, pretty quick and best of all no moving parts so can take a lot of abuse. The atom is nice and the speed of the SSD isnt really an issue.<br />
Also get in touch! wanna pick your brains! and congrats as well if you didnt get my other msgs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sulfide</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/06/09/asus-eee-900a/comment-page-1/#comment-1239</link>
		<dc:creator>sulfide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 12:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=353#comment-1239</guid>
		<description>i have a eeepc 1000, and the SSD are terrible, i highly recommend getting a hdd version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have a eeepc 1000, and the SSD are terrible, i highly recommend getting a hdd version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Stormont</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/06/09/asus-eee-900a/comment-page-1/#comment-1238</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Stormont</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 07:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=353#comment-1238</guid>
		<description>Whatever you get, just make sure it doesn&#039;t have a VIA CPU (and/or GPU), coz you will end up putting it through a window :P

Go for something with a celeron or atom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever you get, just make sure it doesn&#8217;t have a VIA CPU (and/or GPU), coz you will end up putting it through a window <img src='http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/wp-content/mu-plugins/tango-smilies/tango/face-raspberry.png' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Go for something with a celeron or atom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marius Gedminas</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/06/09/asus-eee-900a/comment-page-1/#comment-1237</link>
		<dc:creator>Marius Gedminas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 18:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=353#comment-1237</guid>
		<description>I have the 900 (no A) and am not very happy with it: the SSD is very slow, the 4-cell battery life is short (under 2 hours), and the CPU is a bit slow (no HD versions of youtube movies).  The 900A ought to be better about the CPU at least.

A word of warning: DON&#039;T USE EXT3, or you&#039;ll find that the blocks allocated to the journal become unreadable in less than a year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the 900 (no A) and am not very happy with it: the SSD is very slow, the 4-cell battery life is short (under 2 hours), and the CPU is a bit slow (no HD versions of youtube movies).  The 900A ought to be better about the CPU at least.</p>
<p>A word of warning: DON&#8217;T USE EXT3, or you&#8217;ll find that the blocks allocated to the journal become unreadable in less than a year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Hughes: ASUS EEE 900A &#124; Full-Linux.com</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/06/09/asus-eee-900a/comment-page-1/#comment-1236</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Hughes: ASUS EEE 900A &#124; Full-Linux.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=353#comment-1236</guid>
		<description>[...] available information related to your search Richard Hughes: ASUS EEE 900A is now available in this link&#8230;:         News [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] available information related to your search Richard Hughes: ASUS EEE 900A is now available in this link&#8230;:         News [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GreySim</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/06/09/asus-eee-900a/comment-page-1/#comment-1234</link>
		<dc:creator>GreySim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 01:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=353#comment-1234</guid>
		<description>I had a 900A for several months and tried to use it as my primary computer for that time. Didn&#039;t go so well. Before I say more I want to point out though that there are multiple versions of the 900A, and I don&#039;t mean 900A vs. 900 vs. 900HD (or whatever), but multiple versions of just the 900A itself. Some have 16/20 GB, some have 4. Some have a camera, some don&#039;t. Some I think have Bluetooth, but again, not all. I had a 4 GB model with no camera or Bluetooth with Ubuntu installed and it was a really nice machine, just not for full time desktop computer replacement.

Specific points:

The keyboard is tiny, but you get used to it. I have huge hands, hands that other people with big hands feel compelled to challenge to see whose is bigger; I&#039;ve only lost those challenges once.

4 GB is barely enough unless you&#039;re sticking to a fairly stock install, adding a handful of programs, and maybe doing development on a few small pieces of software. You definitely can&#039;t fit a bunch of apps on there on the off chance that you&#039;ll use them, there just isn&#039;t room.

The trackpad buttons are pretty bad, but I used gestures and multi-finger taps so much that I barely noticed.

The video card was adequate for Compiz-type things, but apparently performance was better in Hardy than it had been in Intrepid. I never tested Jaunty with it, but hear that the card in the 900A was a good supported one and not one with all the reported Intel problems. I don&#039;t know how it is with other distros.

FBReader is very nice with it. You can even do rotation and hold it like a book.

Overall, I would recommend getting it if it&#039;s the 16GB+ model, otherwise I would think very hard about trying to squeeze everything you might want into 4 GB.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a 900A for several months and tried to use it as my primary computer for that time. Didn&#8217;t go so well. Before I say more I want to point out though that there are multiple versions of the 900A, and I don&#8217;t mean 900A vs. 900 vs. 900HD (or whatever), but multiple versions of just the 900A itself. Some have 16/20 GB, some have 4. Some have a camera, some don&#8217;t. Some I think have Bluetooth, but again, not all. I had a 4 GB model with no camera or Bluetooth with Ubuntu installed and it was a really nice machine, just not for full time desktop computer replacement.</p>
<p>Specific points:</p>
<p>The keyboard is tiny, but you get used to it. I have huge hands, hands that other people with big hands feel compelled to challenge to see whose is bigger; I&#8217;ve only lost those challenges once.</p>
<p>4 GB is barely enough unless you&#8217;re sticking to a fairly stock install, adding a handful of programs, and maybe doing development on a few small pieces of software. You definitely can&#8217;t fit a bunch of apps on there on the off chance that you&#8217;ll use them, there just isn&#8217;t room.</p>
<p>The trackpad buttons are pretty bad, but I used gestures and multi-finger taps so much that I barely noticed.</p>
<p>The video card was adequate for Compiz-type things, but apparently performance was better in Hardy than it had been in Intrepid. I never tested Jaunty with it, but hear that the card in the 900A was a good supported one and not one with all the reported Intel problems. I don&#8217;t know how it is with other distros.</p>
<p>FBReader is very nice with it. You can even do rotation and hold it like a book.</p>
<p>Overall, I would recommend getting it if it&#8217;s the 16GB+ model, otherwise I would think very hard about trying to squeeze everything you might want into 4 GB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rusty</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/06/09/asus-eee-900a/comment-page-1/#comment-1233</link>
		<dc:creator>Rusty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 22:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=353#comment-1233</guid>
		<description>Single best piece of advice I think that is out there is to try the keyboard for something more complicated than &#039;the quick brown fox...&#039;

I have a 700, and one of the 90x series. both have the same keyboard and I have to admit that I think it is the weak element in the system. That does not mean that it&#039;s a bad system, just a week point as far as I am concerned.

If you are comfortable with the 900A keyboard, go for it. If it feels cramped, go up to one of the 1000 series devices, or look a tan Acer Aspire One.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Single best piece of advice I think that is out there is to try the keyboard for something more complicated than &#8216;the quick brown fox&#8230;&#8217;</p>
<p>I have a 700, and one of the 90x series. both have the same keyboard and I have to admit that I think it is the weak element in the system. That does not mean that it&#8217;s a bad system, just a week point as far as I am concerned.</p>
<p>If you are comfortable with the 900A keyboard, go for it. If it feels cramped, go up to one of the 1000 series devices, or look a tan Acer Aspire One.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/06/09/asus-eee-900a/comment-page-1/#comment-1232</link>
		<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 21:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=353#comment-1232</guid>
		<description>Nog, I&#039;ve got a 901 (20G Linux SSD) version and I&#039;m happy with it.  A bit slow, but everything works.  I don&#039;t like the shift key on the right side of the arrow keys - That&#039;s amazingly more frustrating than I could have expected.    In addition to the Fedora, I also ran Crunchbang Linux on it.  Great interface, which I intend to mimic in fedora.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nog, I&#8217;ve got a 901 (20G Linux SSD) version and I&#8217;m happy with it.  A bit slow, but everything works.  I don&#8217;t like the shift key on the right side of the arrow keys &#8211; That&#8217;s amazingly more frustrating than I could have expected.    In addition to the Fedora, I also ran Crunchbang Linux on it.  Great interface, which I intend to mimic in fedora.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tante</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/06/09/asus-eee-900a/comment-page-1/#comment-1231</link>
		<dc:creator>tante</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 21:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=353#comment-1231</guid>
		<description>The 900A  has a camera. It&#039;s a sucky 0.3 mpixel thingy, but it works and makes pictures ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 900A  has a camera. It&#8217;s a sucky 0.3 mpixel thingy, but it works and makes pictures <img src='http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/wp-content/mu-plugins/tango-smilies/tango/face-wink.png' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
