By hughsie on September 23, 2009
Every time somebody writes “Linux is about choice” something inside of me dies. Just because something can be done, doesn’t mean it should be done.
Posted in Uncategorized | 28 Responses
“Linux is not intelligent design, Linux is evolution.”
And a lot of choices will just die in the process. Just get used to it or you will be dead pretty soon
Evolution’s too slow! Let’s design Linux and open source software intelligently!
“Linux” isn’t about anything except being free and open, since those are it’s defining characteristics. But, otherwise, it’s not animate, so it has no specific desires. Some distros (both technical and social) might be about choice, and others might not be. And that’s fair. I’d agree that some things shouldn’t be done, but I’m definitely glad knowing that people have the ability to try, and decide for themselves.
In any case, I’m curious where you’re hearing that, and why it’s bothering you?
I would also recommend to anyone repeating that meme to read The Paradox of Choice (or to watch the talk).
The curious thing about evolution is that no one realizes what is really evolving.
Nature takes a giant enzyme of 4 million atoms, keeps tweaking it, makes a great acid. Years and years go by, and suddenly it can move an oxygen atom. Then one day after eons it’s responsible for energy transfer.
Evolution is purely observed in retrospect.
I interpret “Linux is about choice” as “Linux is about having the freedom to choose”, not “Linux is about making choices”.
Also, something inside of me dies every time I have to type in my password multiple times to execute a single action in a PolicyKit-using app (I kid, I kid)
Tons of shitty choices, that is. I’m glad something like App store pops out once in a while to make part of linux less lame.
Life is about choice.
I guess you already know about that:
It’s good to read it again sometimes.
Linux is a kernel, and making one piece of software out to mean more than it does will get you into trouble.
Free Software happens to be the best means to get to the end of Excellent Software.
Right now it’s doing this mainly through OS X. Hopefully Ubuntu can replace it soon.
Linux is about choice just like the SAT or ACT. Too many wrong choices may ruin your life, and you have to spend a lot of time RingTFM to know which choices are right.
I don’t understand, the only reason for PackageKit is so N completely different bits of code can be chosen. Instead of “just doing it well, once” which I assume is the implication of your statement.
So why complain about something you’ve worked so hard to help.
Sadly Linux (and FLOSS in general) is about developer-choice only nowadays.
Man, when I read your blog title in my feed reader I got that exact same feeling. I get terribly annoyed when people confuse choice and freedom.
I’d say its about evolution.
Best technology wins
I agree, but I’d like to extend my disgust to the general case of “Linux is about *”.
Linux isn’t “about” anything. It’s an operating system.
Well, L…ife is about choice.
And it’s not necessarily a bad thing.
Makes me think of this saying: “we can joke about everything, but not with everyone”.
Some people like choice, some don’t and some just don’t want to be overhelmed by it. But no one will agree on a single common solution.
It’s utterly true that Linux (and Free software in general) is not about choice.
But this should not be used as an excuse to start writing alternatives to existing software. Especially when there are design issues in said software, and new designs need to be explored.
I meant “to not start writing alternatives”, of course.
There are two LINUXs:
(1) The first is about “choice”. Primarily this exists in order to give dreary pedantic people an infinite range of topic to gripe, whine, and complain about. And have flame wars where they all fly their ignorance as a flag. They hate GUIs or LINUX’s GUI(s) will never equal Window’s awesomeness. And developers trying to tell users how to do things. Or utterly incoherent copyright/patent conspiracy theories. And why can’t you run LINUX & GNOME/KDE on a 15 year old computer? BLOAT! BLOAT, I say!
Someone needs to build a type#1 e-mail filter.
(2) The second LINUX is about actually *using* a computer, getting things done. You hear a lot less from these people – they are too busy actually doing something with their computer.
It is about choice, ulimately. To waste your type on Type#1 users or focus on Type#2 users. Fortunately Type#2 users are usually fun and interesting.
You mean like PackageKit or PulseAudio?
No, PackageKit removes choice. It gives one API client applications can use, rather than 8 commands that an application has to choose from. By having one API an application can add functionality knowing that it’ll work no matter what distribution it is running on.
“Every time somebody writes “Linux is about choice” something inside of me dies.”
I have always felt the same – thanks for putting it to words so nicely. I’d like to add, that every time somebody writes “Linux is ALL about choice” something inside of me gets tortured first and then dies These belong to a large group of in my opinion largely brainless (sorry) sayings, that have started to live lives of their own.
Here’s an article about how Microsoft’s Silverlight technology brings Linux users more choice – which is “paramount”:
I keep listening to the news speak about getting free online grant applications so I have been looking around for the best site to get one.
“Some distros (both technical and social) might be about choice, and others might not be. And that’s fair.”
So Linux is about choice about choice
Copyright © 2014 Technical Blog of Richard Hughes.
Powered by WordPress and Hybrid.
Bad Behavior has blocked 2769 access attempts in the last 7 days.