<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GNOME Shell Preview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/09/30/gnome-shell-preview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/09/30/gnome-shell-preview/</link>
	<description>Blog about geeky stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 09:38:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveOll</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/09/30/gnome-shell-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-3445</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveOll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 21:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=411#comment-3445</guid>
		<description>I agree with mystilleef, in that my preconception of gnome-shell would be to have a &#039;super&#039; version of gnome-do that could manage things, coupled with compiz and something like avant windows manager all rolled into one.

Lets hope its not too late for them to listen to this feedback and change things before its too late.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with mystilleef, in that my preconception of gnome-shell would be to have a &#8216;super&#8217; version of gnome-do that could manage things, coupled with compiz and something like avant windows manager all rolled into one.</p>
<p>Lets hope its not too late for them to listen to this feedback and change things before its too late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pedro Lobo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/09/30/gnome-shell-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-3408</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedro Lobo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=411#comment-3408</guid>
		<description>Just to set some poeple straight.

No one has hidden the fact that Gnome-Sheel is still very young and imature. What now seems as a waste of space, or stupid this stupid that feature is in fact a place holder of sorts.

Take for instance the window title in the top panel. It&#039;s just a place holder for gnome global menu.

Be patient and submit bugs sugestions.

Don&#039;t hate what is still to come.

I recall in the beginning of KDE4, even KDE followers hated it, now they all praise it. (I don&#039;t of course speak for all KDE fans lol)

Personally I love 2.28 and am rather curios to see where 3.0 is going.

I have faith...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to set some poeple straight.</p>
<p>No one has hidden the fact that Gnome-Sheel is still very young and imature. What now seems as a waste of space, or stupid this stupid that feature is in fact a place holder of sorts.</p>
<p>Take for instance the window title in the top panel. It&#8217;s just a place holder for gnome global menu.</p>
<p>Be patient and submit bugs sugestions.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t hate what is still to come.</p>
<p>I recall in the beginning of KDE4, even KDE followers hated it, now they all praise it. (I don&#8217;t of course speak for all KDE fans lol)</p>
<p>Personally I love 2.28 and am rather curios to see where 3.0 is going.</p>
<p>I have faith&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonas</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/09/30/gnome-shell-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-3406</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=411#comment-3406</guid>
		<description>Michael: 
I agree fully with you, gnome-shell is simply put one of the best UI&#039;s I have tried in a long time. 
Sure there are some quirks but not more than in any other UI I tried. 

I also love that there is no-configuration! 
I can agree with all of you out there that says that we all have different needs and preferences. 
However the configuration possibility in Linux programs is usually, in my opinion, also why Linux software often lacks in usability with commercial systems.
The open source programmers spend too much time to implement clever theming/config options instead of using good default options that at least 80% of the userbase wants.
Priority one is as always stability but close are good default settings. Good job Gnome team, keep your head high.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael:<br />
I agree fully with you, gnome-shell is simply put one of the best UI&#8217;s I have tried in a long time.<br />
Sure there are some quirks but not more than in any other UI I tried. </p>
<p>I also love that there is no-configuration!<br />
I can agree with all of you out there that says that we all have different needs and preferences.<br />
However the configuration possibility in Linux programs is usually, in my opinion, also why Linux software often lacks in usability with commercial systems.<br />
The open source programmers spend too much time to implement clever theming/config options instead of using good default options that at least 80% of the userbase wants.<br />
Priority one is as always stability but close are good default settings. Good job Gnome team, keep your head high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Vogt</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/09/30/gnome-shell-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-3340</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Vogt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 21:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=411#comment-3340</guid>
		<description>Am I the only one finding a lot to like about Gnome-shell? It&#039;s not feature complete at the moment, but I already find it preferable to the direction that KDE4 took. So far the main configuration option I want is to be able to display the full date at the top instead of just the day and time. Everything else I find to be intuitive and beautiful.

Perhaps I won&#039;t feel that way over time, but right now I find it comfortable and intuitive. I do like the clever windows design someone showed before. I see no reason that this couldn&#039;t be used along with the Gnome Shell.

I say good work to the Gnome team; I&#039;m excited about 3.0.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only one finding a lot to like about Gnome-shell? It&#8217;s not feature complete at the moment, but I already find it preferable to the direction that KDE4 took. So far the main configuration option I want is to be able to display the full date at the top instead of just the day and time. Everything else I find to be intuitive and beautiful.</p>
<p>Perhaps I won&#8217;t feel that way over time, but right now I find it comfortable and intuitive. I do like the clever windows design someone showed before. I see no reason that this couldn&#8217;t be used along with the Gnome Shell.</p>
<p>I say good work to the Gnome team; I&#8217;m excited about 3.0.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cassidy James</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/09/30/gnome-shell-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-3245</link>
		<dc:creator>Cassidy James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=411#comment-3245</guid>
		<description>The devs are working on theming, I believe using CSS. There will probably also be integration into the system theme.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The devs are working on theming, I believe using CSS. There will probably also be integration into the system theme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kurye</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/09/30/gnome-shell-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-3204</link>
		<dc:creator>kurye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=411#comment-3204</guid>
		<description>i wish you continued success thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i wish you continued success thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FunkyM</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/09/30/gnome-shell-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-3140</link>
		<dc:creator>FunkyM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 13:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=411#comment-3140</guid>
		<description>Can please someone drive a big usability truck over what is called &quot;gnome-shell&quot; before it&#039;s too late and one has to abandon the ship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can please someone drive a big usability truck over what is called &#8220;gnome-shell&#8221; before it&#8217;s too late and one has to abandon the ship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobpoljakov</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/09/30/gnome-shell-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-3129</link>
		<dc:creator>bobpoljakov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 13:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=411#comment-3129</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve found this, it&#039;s pretty interesting: http://www.gnome.org/~mccann/shell/design/GNOME_Shell-20090705.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve found this, it&#8217;s pretty interesting: <a href="http://www.gnome.org/~mccann/shell/design/GNOME_Shell-20090705.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.gnome.org/~mccann/shell/design/GNOME_Shell-20090705.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Søren Hauberg</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/09/30/gnome-shell-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-3127</link>
		<dc:creator>Søren Hauberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 09:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=411#comment-3127</guid>
		<description>One thing that bugs me about the top-bar is that so much space is spend on telling me what my name is. Really, I think I&#039;ve learned my own name by now, so I don&#039;t need for the computer to tell me all the time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing that bugs me about the top-bar is that so much space is spend on telling me what my name is. Really, I think I&#8217;ve learned my own name by now, so I don&#8217;t need for the computer to tell me all the time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markez linda</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/09/30/gnome-shell-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-3125</link>
		<dc:creator>markez linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 09:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=411#comment-3125</guid>
		<description>There is obviously a lot to know about this.  I think you made some good points in Features also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is obviously a lot to know about this.  I think you made some good points in Features also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/09/30/gnome-shell-preview/feed/ ) in 1.35143 seconds, on Feb 12th, 2012 at 3:34 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 12th, 2012 at 4:34 am UTC -->
