<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: gnome-shell a week later&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/10/04/gnome-shell-a-week-later/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/10/04/gnome-shell-a-week-later/</link>
	<description>Blog about geeky stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 09:38:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TrueTom</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/10/04/gnome-shell-a-week-later/comment-page-1/#comment-3138</link>
		<dc:creator>TrueTom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 08:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=414#comment-3138</guid>
		<description>I hope you are aware that the  &quot;post the bug numbers&quot; line is just an ad hominem argument. Which is probably OK since it&#039;s basically the only response the Gnome Shell people have come up so far regarding criticism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope you are aware that the  &#8220;post the bug numbers&#8221; line is just an ad hominem argument. Which is probably OK since it&#8217;s basically the only response the Gnome Shell people have come up so far regarding criticism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rahul Sundaram</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/10/04/gnome-shell-a-week-later/comment-page-1/#comment-3137</link>
		<dc:creator>Rahul Sundaram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 23:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=414#comment-3137</guid>
		<description>GNOME Shell is a distinct component from gnome-globalmenu.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GNOME Shell is a distinct component from gnome-globalmenu.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dgrift</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/10/04/gnome-shell-a-week-later/comment-page-1/#comment-3136</link>
		<dc:creator>dgrift</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 20:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=414#comment-3136</guid>
		<description>In the places part in the activity menu, my bookmarks do not show. I have some ssh/network bookmarks and in the usual gnome places they get displayed but not in gnome-shell.

In the side bar, the time gets displayed properly (24hr the way i have configured it), but in the top bar it uses the AM/PM (not how i configured it)

I works much better than i expected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the places part in the activity menu, my bookmarks do not show. I have some ssh/network bookmarks and in the usual gnome places they get displayed but not in gnome-shell.</p>
<p>In the side bar, the time gets displayed properly (24hr the way i have configured it), but in the top bar it uses the AM/PM (not how i configured it)</p>
<p>I works much better than i expected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gantenbein</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/10/04/gnome-shell-a-week-later/comment-page-1/#comment-3135</link>
		<dc:creator>gantenbein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 20:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=414#comment-3135</guid>
		<description>Why is a top bar space waste? Current GNOME has even two panels. And every other environment I know of has at least one bar by default.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is a top bar space waste? Current GNOME has even two panels. And every other environment I know of has at least one bar by default.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ethana2</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/10/04/gnome-shell-a-week-later/comment-page-1/#comment-3134</link>
		<dc:creator>ethana2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 19:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=414#comment-3134</guid>
		<description>Does it include gnome-globalmenu?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does it include gnome-globalmenu?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald Damon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/10/04/gnome-shell-a-week-later/comment-page-1/#comment-3133</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald Damon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 18:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=414#comment-3133</guid>
		<description>@Tim,
It may be obvious in your hardware, but are you sure that it&#039;s obvious on the hardware of the developers? If this is the case, how are they able to fix problems they don&#039;t know about?

Given Richard&#039;s comments about the fast bug fixes, I don&#039;t think that the &quot;no, patches welcome&quot; will be the reply. Keep in mind, GNOME is not a monolith. Different modules are managed by different people. Whatever your past experience with a specific GNOME team, it does not appear to be the case with this GNOME team.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tim,<br />
It may be obvious in your hardware, but are you sure that it&#8217;s obvious on the hardware of the developers? If this is the case, how are they able to fix problems they don&#8217;t know about?</p>
<p>Given Richard&#8217;s comments about the fast bug fixes, I don&#8217;t think that the &#8220;no, patches welcome&#8221; will be the reply. Keep in mind, GNOME is not a monolith. Different modules are managed by different people. Whatever your past experience with a specific GNOME team, it does not appear to be the case with this GNOME team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/10/04/gnome-shell-a-week-later/comment-page-1/#comment-3132</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 15:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=414#comment-3132</guid>
		<description>Signing up and explaining myself just to be ignored with a &quot;patches welcome&quot; at best for these obvious shortcomings. I don&#039;t think so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Signing up and explaining myself just to be ignored with a &#8220;patches welcome&#8221; at best for these obvious shortcomings. I don&#8217;t think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aklapper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/10/04/gnome-shell-a-week-later/comment-page-1/#comment-3131</link>
		<dc:creator>aklapper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 15:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=414#comment-3131</guid>
		<description>@Tim: Feel free to post the bug numbers in GNOME Bugzilla here for the issues you&#039;ve mentioned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/10/04/gnome-shell-a-week-later/#comment-3132">Tim</a>: Feel free to post the bug numbers in GNOME Bugzilla here for the issues you&#8217;ve mentioned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimbo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/10/04/gnome-shell-a-week-later/comment-page-1/#comment-3130</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 15:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=414#comment-3130</guid>
		<description>Tim sums it up above me, all the stuff he mentioned needs to be fixed before you release it into the wild.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim sums it up above me, all the stuff he mentioned needs to be fixed before you release it into the wild.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/10/04/gnome-shell-a-week-later/comment-page-1/#comment-3128</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 10:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/?p=414#comment-3128</guid>
		<description>So what else was addressed?

Slow taskswitch? Space waste top bar? Ugly zoomed icons? No config/option/hot edges? No panel gadgets? Bad layout on small screens? Empathy/Evolution/xxx integration?

That said I think these things are polish, but they need to be implemented BEFORE release day or you will get major KDE4-esque blowback. Don&#039;t just ask around in your small little happy Gnome world or you will be hit by the uglyness of the intertubes ones this shell ships in distros.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what else was addressed?</p>
<p>Slow taskswitch? Space waste top bar? Ugly zoomed icons? No config/option/hot edges? No panel gadgets? Bad layout on small screens? Empathy/Evolution/xxx integration?</p>
<p>That said I think these things are polish, but they need to be implemented BEFORE release day or you will get major KDE4-esque blowback. Don&#8217;t just ask around in your small little happy Gnome world or you will be hit by the uglyness of the intertubes ones this shell ships in distros.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/10/04/gnome-shell-a-week-later/feed/ ) in 0.17730 seconds, on Feb 11th, 2012 at 3:25 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 11th, 2012 at 4:25 am UTC -->
