<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: gnome-gpg improvement</title>
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2006/01/12/gnome-gpg-improvement/</link>
	<description>Random stuff</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 01:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adam Schreiber</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2006/01/12/gnome-gpg-improvement/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Schreiber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2006/01/12/gnome-gpg-improvement/#comment-99</guid>
		<description>James,&lt;p/&gt;I was wondering if gnome-gpg's functionality shouldn't be integrated with Seahorse in some manner.&lt;p/&gt;Adam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James,
<p />I was wondering if gnome-gpg&#8217;s functionality shouldn&#8217;t be integrated with Seahorse in some manner.
<p />Adam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Henstridge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2006/01/12/gnome-gpg-improvement/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>James Henstridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2006/01/12/gnome-gpg-improvement/#comment-100</guid>
		<description>Adam: gnome-gpg serves a fairly different purpose to Seahorse.  It acts as a wrapper for gpg that lets you store your passphrase in the Gnome keyring.  So if you have a script or program that wants to invoke gpg, you can drop in gnome-gpg instead.&lt;p/&gt;In contrast, Seahorse is designed as a GUI for performing encryption/decryption/signing/verification.  It doesn't really overlap that much.&lt;p/&gt;The one place where they could cooperate is in the names of the keys they store in gnome-keyring.  If those match, then the user would only need to type their passphrase in once for both uses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam: gnome-gpg serves a fairly different purpose to Seahorse.  It acts as a wrapper for gpg that lets you store your passphrase in the Gnome keyring.  So if you have a script or program that wants to invoke gpg, you can drop in gnome-gpg instead.
<p />In contrast, Seahorse is designed as a GUI for performing encryption/decryption/signing/verification.  It doesn&#8217;t really overlap that much.
<p />The one place where they could cooperate is in the names of the keys they store in gnome-keyring.  If those match, then the user would only need to type their passphrase in once for both uses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2006/01/12/gnome-gpg-improvement/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2006/01/12/gnome-gpg-improvement/#comment-101</guid>
		<description>Any chance of making use of gpg-agent if available?  I prefer to store my GPG passphrase in gpg-agent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any chance of making use of gpg-agent if available?  I prefer to store my GPG passphrase in gpg-agent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
