<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox Ligature Bug Followup</title>
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2006/04/06/firefox-ligature-bug-followup/</link>
	<description>Random stuff</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 01:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joachim Breitner</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2006/04/06/firefox-ligature-bug-followup/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>Joachim Breitner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2006/04/06/firefox-ligature-bug-followup/#comment-142</guid>
		<description>Another observervation is that the bug also appears in the galeon browser...&lt;p/&gt;BTW the word "fix" looks really cool this way...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another observervation is that the bug also appears in the galeon browser&#8230;
<p />BTW the word &#8220;fix&#8221; looks really cool this way&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michele</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2006/04/06/firefox-ligature-bug-followup/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>michele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2006/04/06/firefox-ligature-bug-followup/#comment-143</guid>
		<description>Thanks for pointing this bug out James, I've missed the your first post, this was really bugging me.&lt;p/&gt;Yep, the word "fix" looks cool but I prefer it now that I've switched to Bitstream Vera (thanks for providing a test case Joachim). :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for pointing this bug out James, I&#8217;ve missed the your first post, this was really bugging me.
<p />Yep, the word &#8220;fix&#8221; looks cool but I prefer it now that I&#8217;ve switched to Bitstream Vera (thanks for providing a test case Joachim). <img src='http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/wp-content/mu-plugins/tango-smilies/face-grin.png' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' width='16' height='16' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denis Jacquerye</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2006/04/06/firefox-ligature-bug-followup/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>Denis Jacquerye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2006/04/06/firefox-ligature-bug-followup/#comment-144</guid>
		<description>The ligatures could also be disabled in free fonts like DejaVu fonts in distribs that display the bug. I think we even made such a release a few months back because of this bug.&lt;p/&gt;Bitstream Vera does contain the 'fi' and 'fl' ligatures but isn't OpenType so Pango does not perform the substitutions. If Pango starts doing so...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ligatures could also be disabled in free fonts like DejaVu fonts in distribs that display the bug. I think we even made such a release a few months back because of this bug.
<p />Bitstream Vera does contain the &#8216;fi&#8217; and &#8216;fl&#8217; ligatures but isn&#8217;t OpenType so Pango does not perform the substitutions. If Pango starts doing so&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Henstridge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2006/04/06/firefox-ligature-bug-followup/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>James Henstridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2006/04/06/firefox-ligature-bug-followup/#comment-145</guid>
		<description>Denis: yeah, I noticed that the Vera font contained a few ligature glyphs (although not as many as Deja Vu) while investigating the problem, but did not have the OpenType tables necessary for them to be used by Pango.&lt;p/&gt;I'd prefer not to modify the fonts directly, since it affects how documents using that font display.  It would be a lot nicer if the pango rendering code in Firefox was fixed ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Denis: yeah, I noticed that the Vera font contained a few ligature glyphs (although not as many as Deja Vu) while investigating the problem, but did not have the OpenType tables necessary for them to be used by Pango.
<p />I&#8217;d prefer not to modify the fonts directly, since it affects how documents using that font display.  It would be a lot nicer if the pango rendering code in Firefox was fixed &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
