Comments on: ZeroConf support for Bazaar http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/03/25/zeroconf-support-for-bazaar/ Random stuff Sat, 05 Jul 2008 05:25:04 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 By: Pharao http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/03/25/zeroconf-support-for-bazaar/#comment-380 Pharao Sun, 25 Mar 2007 19:38:28 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/03/25/zeroconf-support-for-bazaar/#comment-380 just great - thanks :) just great - thanks :)

]]> By: Christopher http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/03/25/zeroconf-support-for-bazaar/#comment-381 Christopher Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/03/25/zeroconf-support-for-bazaar/#comment-381 Excellent idea! Excellent idea!

]]> By: glatzor http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/03/25/zeroconf-support-for-bazaar/#comment-382 glatzor Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/03/25/zeroconf-support-for-bazaar/#comment-382 I already love your plugin! I already love your plugin!

]]> By: Michael Scherer http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/03/25/zeroconf-support-for-bazaar/#comment-383 Michael Scherer Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/03/25/zeroconf-support-for-bazaar/#comment-383 This seems like svl, a svk layer providing the same feature for svk. You should take a look to see if there is some interesting concept to implement. Too bad that svl developpement is stalled. This seems like svl, a svk layer providing the same feature for svk. You should take a look to see if there is some interesting concept to implement. Too bad that svl developpement is stalled.

]]> By: Michael Scherer http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/03/25/zeroconf-support-for-bazaar/#comment-384 Michael Scherer Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/03/25/zeroconf-support-for-bazaar/#comment-384 Oups, forgot the url to svl : <a href="http://search.cpan.org/~abergman/SVL-0.29/">http://search.cpan.org/~abergman/SVL-0.29/</a> Oups, forgot the url to svl : http://search.cpan.org/~abergman/SVL-0.29/

]]> By: James Henstridge http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/03/25/zeroconf-support-for-bazaar/#comment-385 James Henstridge Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/03/25/zeroconf-support-for-bazaar/#comment-385 Michael: I think a lot of the SVL features are already part of the Bazaar core. My code basically just instantiates the existing Bazaar server implementation and does the mDNS advertisement.<p/>That said, there is definitely room for improvement on the client side for bzr-avahi. I have a few ideas about how to improve things mentioned in the main article.<p/>One of the new features of Bazaar is the concept of a unique tree root ID. All related branches share the same tree root ID. If this is included in the advertised data, it would allow the plugin to show only the branches that could be merged to a particular target. Michael: I think a lot of the SVL features are already part of the Bazaar core. My code basically just instantiates the existing Bazaar server implementation and does the mDNS advertisement.

That said, there is definitely room for improvement on the client side for bzr-avahi. I have a few ideas about how to improve things mentioned in the main article.

One of the new features of Bazaar is the concept of a unique tree root ID. All related branches share the same tree root ID. If this is included in the advertised data, it would allow the plugin to show only the branches that could be merged to a particular target.

]]>