<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canonical Shop Open</title>
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/08/22/canonical-shop-open/</link>
	<description>Random stuff</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 15:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Henstridge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/08/22/canonical-shop-open/#comment-442</link>
		<dc:creator>James Henstridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 13:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/08/22/canonical-shop-open/#comment-442</guid>
		<description>If you look closely, you'll see that OpenID is being used under the hood to authenticate to the shop.  As for accepting external OpenIDs as a form of identification, I can't give a time line for that becoming available.

Note that we are depending on a little more than a simple identity URL here though.  A Launchpad ID also means we have a verified email address for the account, and don't need to redo that validation when using the shop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you look closely, you&#8217;ll see that OpenID is being used under the hood to authenticate to the shop.  As for accepting external OpenIDs as a form of identification, I can&#8217;t give a time line for that becoming available.</p>
<p>Note that we are depending on a little more than a simple identity URL here though.  A Launchpad ID also means we have a verified email address for the account, and don&#8217;t need to redo that validation when using the shop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolfger</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/08/22/canonical-shop-open/#comment-441</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolfger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 11:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/08/22/canonical-shop-open/#comment-441</guid>
		<description>I second the "why not OpenID?" question. For an Open solution, it sure seems to be underutilized by FOSS websites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second the &#8220;why not OpenID?&#8221; question. For an Open solution, it sure seems to be underutilized by FOSS websites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pvandewyngaerde</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/08/22/canonical-shop-open/#comment-440</link>
		<dc:creator>pvandewyngaerde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/08/22/canonical-shop-open/#comment-440</guid>
		<description>why not openID authentication ??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why not openID authentication ??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sourcecode.de</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/08/22/canonical-shop-open/#comment-439</link>
		<dc:creator>sourcecode.de</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/08/22/canonical-shop-open/#comment-439</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Ubuntus Shop&lt;/strong&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ubuntus Shop</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
