Comments on: OpenID 2.0 http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/10/23/openid-20/ Random stuff Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:53:32 +0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2 hourly 1 By: John Bäckstrand http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/10/23/openid-20/comment-page-1/#comment-494 John Bäckstrand Tue, 06 Nov 2007 15:13:06 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/10/23/openid-20/#comment-494 "I don’t like the idea of i-names. Too centralized, and costs money. Which are, quite frankly, against the principle of OpenID: The whole idea of OpenID is that it’s decentralized and easy to obtain." Ahemm, but doesn't OpenID depend on DNS? Which in turn is not free? :) “I don’t like the idea of i-names. Too centralized, and costs money. Which are, quite frankly, against the principle of OpenID: The whole idea of OpenID is that it’s decentralized and easy to obtain.”

Ahemm, but doesn’t OpenID depend on DNS? Which in turn is not free? :)

]]> By: Pushing String » Well-rounded identity for the whole person http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/10/23/openid-20/comment-page-1/#comment-490 Pushing String » Well-rounded identity for the whole person Tue, 30 Oct 2007 14:52:36 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/10/23/openid-20/#comment-490 [...] reading Will Norris’s post OpenID is not a provisioning engine. He riffs on a scenario from James Henstridge where you can propagate a new shipping address to every service that needs to know it. (Actually, I [...] [...] reading Will Norris’s post OpenID is not a provisioning engine. He riffs on a scenario from James Henstridge where you can propagate a new shipping address to every service that needs to know it. (Actually, I [...]

]]> By: OpenID is not a provisioning engine http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/10/23/openid-20/comment-page-1/#comment-488 OpenID is not a provisioning engine Tue, 30 Oct 2007 08:11:56 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/10/23/openid-20/#comment-488 [...] talking about the future possibilities of OpenID 2.0 and the Attribute Exchange extension, James Henstridge [...] [...] talking about the future possibilities of OpenID 2.0 and the Attribute Exchange extension, James Henstridge [...]

]]> By: Anonymous http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/10/23/openid-20/comment-page-1/#comment-478 Anonymous Wed, 24 Oct 2007 15:25:49 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/10/23/openid-20/#comment-478 I don't like the idea of i-names. Too centralized, and costs money. Which are, quite frankly, against the principle of OpenID: The whole idea of OpenID is that it's decentralized and easy to obtain. I don’t like the idea of i-names. Too centralized, and costs money. Which are, quite frankly, against the principle of OpenID: The whole idea of OpenID is that it’s decentralized and easy to obtain.

]]> By: James Henstridge http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/10/23/openid-20/comment-page-1/#comment-477 James Henstridge Wed, 24 Oct 2007 01:51:17 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/10/23/openid-20/#comment-477 TG: Perhaps you should direct questions like that to Livejournal. It doesn't seem accurate to say they don't implement the protocol though: they provide an OP implementation for their users, and do make some features available when acting as an RP. J.B.: if the RP trusts that the OP will authenticate users properly and has adequate security in place, there shouldn't be a problem with using OpenID to authenticate. For the case of the Ubuntu shop, we are happy with how Launchpad authenticates users. TG: Perhaps you should direct questions like that to Livejournal. It doesn’t seem accurate to say they don’t implement the protocol though: they provide an OP implementation for their users, and do make some features available when acting as an RP.

J.B.: if the RP trusts that the OP will authenticate users properly and has adequate security in place, there shouldn’t be a problem with using OpenID to authenticate. For the case of the Ubuntu shop, we are happy with how Launchpad authenticates users.

]]> By: J.B. Nicholson-Owens http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/10/23/openid-20/comment-page-1/#comment-471 J.B. Nicholson-Owens Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:55:48 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/10/23/openid-20/#comment-471 I thought OpenID wasn't recommended to be used for sensitive information like authenticating yourself to your bank. Wouldn't using it for authentication with other commercial activities (like shops) come under the same disrecommendation? I thought OpenID wasn’t recommended to be used for sensitive information like authenticating yourself to your bank. Wouldn’t using it for authentication with other commercial activities (like shops) come under the same disrecommendation?

]]> By: TG http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/10/23/openid-20/comment-page-1/#comment-470 TG Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:37:57 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/10/23/openid-20/#comment-470 Any word on when the inventors of openID (i.e. Livejournal) is actually going to implement the protocol themselves? For the past years they've only had a half-assed implementation that doesn't even let you link your openid to your journal. It just creates a new one with a weird random name. Isn't it bad advertisement that the creators won't even use their own invention? Any word on when the inventors of openID (i.e. Livejournal) is actually going to implement the protocol themselves? For the past years they’ve only had a half-assed implementation that doesn’t even let you link your openid to your journal. It just creates a new one with a weird random name.

Isn’t it bad advertisement that the creators won’t even use their own invention?

]]> By: James Henstridge http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/10/23/openid-20/comment-page-1/#comment-469 James Henstridge Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:23:20 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/10/23/openid-20/#comment-469 Tenshu: we are working on supporting Launchpad as an OP. In fact, http://shop.canonical.com/ is the first RP we set that makes use of it. We don't have anything to announce about Launchpad as a general purpose OP yet though. When there is something to announce, it'll be through official channels first though. Tenshu: we are working on supporting Launchpad as an OP. In fact, http://shop.canonical.com/ is the first RP we set that makes use of it. We don’t have anything to announce about Launchpad as a general purpose OP yet though.

When there is something to announce, it’ll be through official channels first though.

]]> By: tenshu http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/10/23/openid-20/comment-page-1/#comment-468 tenshu Tue, 23 Oct 2007 08:40:08 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/10/23/openid-20/#comment-468 Any news on openid support in and for launchpad? Any news on openid support in and for launchpad?

]]>