<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inkscape Migrated to Launchpad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/11/28/inkscape-migrated-to-launchpad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/11/28/inkscape-migrated-to-launchpad/</link>
	<description>Random stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:53:32 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: nicu buculei</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/11/28/inkscape-migrated-to-launchpad/comment-page-1/#comment-534</link>
		<dc:creator>nicu buculei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/11/28/inkscape-migrated-to-launchpad/#comment-534</guid>
		<description>When I joined Inkscape I already had a sf.net account. Long ago they were almost the only game in town.
And for a particular reason: sf.net is not tied with any distro.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I joined Inkscape I already had a sf.net account. Long ago they were almost the only game in town.<br />
And for a particular reason: sf.net is not tied with any distro.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pinky</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/11/28/inkscape-migrated-to-launchpad/comment-page-1/#comment-532</link>
		<dc:creator>pinky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/11/28/inkscape-migrated-to-launchpad/#comment-532</guid>
		<description>@James Henstridge:

As i said before i&#039;m also not a fan of sourceforge. This has two reasons. First i don&#039;t like it technically (especially in Europe it is often really slow) and second sourceforge isn&#039;t complete free software. Personally i don&#039;t have a sourceforge account because of my second point.

So basically because of my second point i also think it isn&#039;t OK to work with sourceforge but i could tolerate it in the sense that a lot of projects started at sourceforge when sourceforge was free. This projects doesn&#039;t migrate knowingly to non-free software but get pushed into it. I would of course prefer if these projects would decide to leave sourceforge and migrate to a complete free platform but i could at least tolerate it if they stay for some time because of their &quot;dullness&quot; and not because of their direct decision to use non-free software.

But if someone migrates away from sourceforge and choose knowingly non-free software than i think this is a really bad move for a free software project. (I just want to remember Linus decision to use a non-free version control system for Linux. This was the same mistake. And as time has shown he get even punished for it as the right holders decided that they doesn&#039;t want Linus to use it for free anymore.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@James Henstridge:</p>
<p>As i said before i&#8217;m also not a fan of sourceforge. This has two reasons. First i don&#8217;t like it technically (especially in Europe it is often really slow) and second sourceforge isn&#8217;t complete free software. Personally i don&#8217;t have a sourceforge account because of my second point.</p>
<p>So basically because of my second point i also think it isn&#8217;t OK to work with sourceforge but i could tolerate it in the sense that a lot of projects started at sourceforge when sourceforge was free. This projects doesn&#8217;t migrate knowingly to non-free software but get pushed into it. I would of course prefer if these projects would decide to leave sourceforge and migrate to a complete free platform but i could at least tolerate it if they stay for some time because of their &#8220;dullness&#8221; and not because of their direct decision to use non-free software.</p>
<p>But if someone migrates away from sourceforge and choose knowingly non-free software than i think this is a really bad move for a free software project. (I just want to remember Linus decision to use a non-free version control system for Linux. This was the same mistake. And as time has shown he get even punished for it as the right holders decided that they doesn&#8217;t want Linus to use it for free anymore.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: naisioxerloro</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/11/28/inkscape-migrated-to-launchpad/comment-page-1/#comment-530</link>
		<dc:creator>naisioxerloro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/11/28/inkscape-migrated-to-launchpad/#comment-530</guid>
		<description>Hi. 
Good design, who make it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi.<br />
Good design, who make it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Henstridge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/11/28/inkscape-migrated-to-launchpad/comment-page-1/#comment-528</link>
		<dc:creator>James Henstridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/11/28/inkscape-migrated-to-launchpad/#comment-528</guid>
		<description>pinky, nicu: out of interest, are there particular reasons you find it okay to work with SourceForge.net but not Launchpad?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pinky, nicu: out of interest, are there particular reasons you find it okay to work with SourceForge.net but not Launchpad?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nicu buculei</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/11/28/inkscape-migrated-to-launchpad/comment-page-1/#comment-525</link>
		<dc:creator>nicu buculei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 10:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/11/28/inkscape-migrated-to-launchpad/#comment-525</guid>
		<description>At this step Inkscape lost me as a bug reporter/triager (I used to do this on the sf.net tracker).  I won&#039;t make a Launchpad account.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At this step Inkscape lost me as a bug reporter/triager (I used to do this on the sf.net tracker).  I won&#8217;t make a Launchpad account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pinky</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/11/28/inkscape-migrated-to-launchpad/comment-page-1/#comment-524</link>
		<dc:creator>pinky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 10:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/11/28/inkscape-migrated-to-launchpad/#comment-524</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m completely with Wade Mealing. It is very sad that a free software project migrates to a proprietary development/bug-tracking platform.

This puts Inkscape definitely in a bad light. Hope you have thought about it or will think about it.

I agree that sourceforge is quite bad. Personally I had never understood how developers and/or users can like sourceforge. But there are other options than non-free software. E.g. savannah, gnome,....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m completely with Wade Mealing. It is very sad that a free software project migrates to a proprietary development/bug-tracking platform.</p>
<p>This puts Inkscape definitely in a bad light. Hope you have thought about it or will think about it.</p>
<p>I agree that sourceforge is quite bad. Personally I had never understood how developers and/or users can like sourceforge. But there are other options than non-free software. E.g. savannah, gnome,&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Henstridge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/11/28/inkscape-migrated-to-launchpad/comment-page-1/#comment-523</link>
		<dc:creator>James Henstridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 09:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/11/28/inkscape-migrated-to-launchpad/#comment-523</guid>
		<description>Wade: the Inkscape developers were not interested in running their own bug tracker (see http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=1196184862.7737.20.camel%40shi), so setting up their own Trac instance wasn&#039;t on the cards.

One of their requirements was an exit strategy, and we do provide XML bug tracker dumps on request from a project owner (we don&#039;t currently have an automated process for this though).

As for the usability comparison, remember that there are two groups of users for a bug tracker: users and developers.  For users, the main features are (1) filing bugs and (2) providing followup information on those bugs.  In contrast, a developer needs to work with the entire collection of bugs so good categorisation and search tools are needed.

While you may have been satisfied with SF.net from a user perspective, it seems that the Inkscape developers were not satisfied with it from a developer perspective.  I hope that you find Launchpad easy to use when filing bugs in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wade: the Inkscape developers were not interested in running their own bug tracker (see <a href="http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=1196184862.7737.20.camel%40shi)" rel="nofollow">http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=1196184862.7737.20.camel%40shi)</a>, so setting up their own Trac instance wasn&#8217;t on the cards.</p>
<p>One of their requirements was an exit strategy, and we do provide XML bug tracker dumps on request from a project owner (we don&#8217;t currently have an automated process for this though).</p>
<p>As for the usability comparison, remember that there are two groups of users for a bug tracker: users and developers.  For users, the main features are (1) filing bugs and (2) providing followup information on those bugs.  In contrast, a developer needs to work with the entire collection of bugs so good categorisation and search tools are needed.</p>
<p>While you may have been satisfied with SF.net from a user perspective, it seems that the Inkscape developers were not satisfied with it from a developer perspective.  I hope that you find Launchpad easy to use when filing bugs in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wade Mealing</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/11/28/inkscape-migrated-to-launchpad/comment-page-1/#comment-522</link>
		<dc:creator>Wade Mealing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 09:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/11/28/inkscape-migrated-to-launchpad/#comment-522</guid>
		<description>Man, this is horrible ! migrating to a closed source bug tracker.  I&#039;ve used sourceforge to lodge bugs before and it wasn&#039;t too hard.  But perhaps trac or something similar might have been a better solution, I realise that I&#039;m armchairing here, but I guess that the inkscape coders don&#039;t seem to think using free software is so important.  Propriatary software wins again !

I keep hearing ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad-answers/+bug/50699) that it&#039;s going to be liberated, relying on software that -may- become free would have us using xara extreme, but.. I&#039;ve contributed very little to inkscape, so I guess I don&#039;t get a say.

Maybe I&#039;m just an unreasonable man, be warned that this migration doesn&#039;t cost inkscape contributions from other free software developers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, this is horrible ! migrating to a closed source bug tracker.  I&#8217;ve used sourceforge to lodge bugs before and it wasn&#8217;t too hard.  But perhaps trac or something similar might have been a better solution, I realise that I&#8217;m armchairing here, but I guess that the inkscape coders don&#8217;t seem to think using free software is so important.  Propriatary software wins again !</p>
<p>I keep hearing ( <a href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad-answers/+bug/50699)" rel="nofollow">https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad-answers/+bug/50699)</a> that it&#8217;s going to be liberated, relying on software that -may- become free would have us using xara extreme, but.. I&#8217;ve contributed very little to inkscape, so I guess I don&#8217;t get a say.</p>
<p>Maybe I&#8217;m just an unreasonable man, be warned that this migration doesn&#8217;t cost inkscape contributions from other free software developers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peteris Krisjanis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/11/28/inkscape-migrated-to-launchpad/comment-page-1/#comment-518</link>
		<dc:creator>Peteris Krisjanis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 06:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2007/11/28/inkscape-migrated-to-launchpad/#comment-518</guid>
		<description>Man, this is great that Inkscape will finally use Launchpad bug system. I used Inkscape in few serious projects this year and wanted to report bunch of bugs I encountered, but SF bug system, with all respect to SF&#039;s long support of open source, is very hard to use. Launchpad, in other way, are easiest system for this, at least for me.

Keepin rocking!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, this is great that Inkscape will finally use Launchpad bug system. I used Inkscape in few serious projects this year and wanted to report bunch of bugs I encountered, but SF bug system, with all respect to SF&#8217;s long support of open source, is very hard to use. Launchpad, in other way, are easiest system for this, at least for me.</p>
<p>Keepin rocking!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
