<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using Storm with Django</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2008/08/01/using-storm-with-django/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2008/08/01/using-storm-with-django/</link>
	<description>Random stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:53:32 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Henstridge &#187; Storm 0.13</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2008/08/01/using-storm-with-django/comment-page-1/#comment-721</link>
		<dc:creator>James Henstridge &#187; Storm 0.13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 08:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2008/08/01/using-storm-with-django/#comment-721</guid>
		<description>[...] The minimum dependencies of the storm.zope.zstorm module have been reduced to just the zope.interface and transaction modules.  This makes it easier to use the per-thread store management code and global transaction management outside of Zope apps (e.g. for integrating with Django). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The minimum dependencies of the storm.zope.zstorm module have been reduced to just the zope.interface and transaction modules.  This makes it easier to use the per-thread store management code and global transaction management outside of Zope apps (e.g. for integrating with Django). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eduardo Willians</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2008/08/01/using-storm-with-django/comment-page-1/#comment-712</link>
		<dc:creator>Eduardo Willians</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 15:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2008/08/01/using-storm-with-django/#comment-712</guid>
		<description>Awesome! Congrats, as Django is becoming the de facto option for web development, integrating Storm with Django will help both projects, especially because both are excellent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome! Congrats, as Django is becoming the de facto option for web development, integrating Storm with Django will help both projects, especially because both are excellent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Henstridge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2008/08/01/using-storm-with-django/comment-page-1/#comment-700</link>
		<dc:creator>James Henstridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 11:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2008/08/01/using-storm-with-django/#comment-700</guid>
		<description>Django Evolution looks interesting, but seems to keep some of the problems of schema generation: if you do two deployments of an application at different times with different versions, running &quot;syncdb&quot; at that time, then upgrade both deployments to the latest version and evolve the schemas are you sure that the two schemas are identical?

If you set up both deployments using a single base schema with migrations run on top in the same order, then the answer will be yes.  If they were deployed with different base schemas and a different set of migrations, then it depends on how good Django Evolution is :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Django Evolution looks interesting, but seems to keep some of the problems of schema generation: if you do two deployments of an application at different times with different versions, running &#8220;syncdb&#8221; at that time, then upgrade both deployments to the latest version and evolve the schemas are you sure that the two schemas are identical?</p>
<p>If you set up both deployments using a single base schema with migrations run on top in the same order, then the answer will be yes.  If they were deployed with different base schemas and a different set of migrations, then it depends on how good Django Evolution is <img src='http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/wp-content/mu-plugins/tango-smilies/tango/face-smile.png' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Torsten Bronger</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2008/08/01/using-storm-with-django/comment-page-1/#comment-699</link>
		<dc:creator>Torsten Bronger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 21:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2008/08/01/using-storm-with-django/#comment-699</guid>
		<description>Maybe Django Evolution will improve the situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe Django Evolution will improve the situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Henstridge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2008/08/01/using-storm-with-django/comment-page-1/#comment-696</link>
		<dc:creator>James Henstridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 11:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2008/08/01/using-storm-with-django/#comment-696</guid>
		<description>Raf: I&#039;d agree that the current state of schema management in Storm is not that great (i.e. it is non-existent).  However, I believe that schema generation as found in Django is not the right solution: a migration framework is what is needed for long lived applications (e.g. like Ruby on Rails).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raf: I&#8217;d agree that the current state of schema management in Storm is not that great (i.e. it is non-existent).  However, I believe that schema generation as found in Django is not the right solution: a migration framework is what is needed for long lived applications (e.g. like Ruby on Rails).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raf</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2008/08/01/using-storm-with-django/comment-page-1/#comment-695</link>
		<dc:creator>Raf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2008/08/01/using-storm-with-django/#comment-695</guid>
		<description>Storm looked alright until I found out that you need to type in the SQL manually even though you have a set of nice models to work with already defined :/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Storm looked alright until I found out that you need to type in the SQL manually even though you have a set of nice models to work with already defined <img src='http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/wp-content/mu-plugins/tango-smilies/tango/face-uncertain.png' alt=':/' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
