<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Re: Continuing to Not Quite Get It at Google&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2008/10/30/google-openi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2008/10/30/google-openi/</link>
	<description>Random stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 12:23:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Norris</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2008/10/30/google-openi/comment-page-1/#comment-749</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Norris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 19:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/?p=380#comment-749</guid>
		<description>While there is a XRDS document &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/xrds/xrds.xml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;published on google.com&lt;/a&gt;, my understanding after the OpenID UX Summit last week is that the consumer side would actually be gmail.com (google.com is for google employees).  But yes, it does sound like that is the plan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While there is a XRDS document <a href="http://www.google.com/xrds/xrds.xml" rel="nofollow">published on google.com</a>, my understanding after the OpenID UX Summit last week is that the consumer side would actually be gmail.com (google.com is for google employees).  But yes, it does sound like that is the plan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Henstridge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2008/10/30/google-openi/comment-page-1/#comment-740</link>
		<dc:creator>James Henstridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 09:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/?p=380#comment-740</guid>
		<description>As I said, the protocol examples they give look like correct OpenID messages (no &quot;mostly&quot; about it).

Once the OpenID realm white listing is out of the way (either by registering a realm or when Google removes the white list), you&#039;d be able to log in using &quot;https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id&quot; as an identity URL – no special buttons required.  If they wanted it&#039;d be pretty easy to make &quot;google.com&quot; provide the same discovery information, similar to what Yahoo has done.  Of course, this isn&#039;t a big deal while the white list is in place since such sites will probably be set up with a button.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I said, the protocol examples they give look like correct OpenID messages (no &#8220;mostly&#8221; about it).</p>
<p>Once the OpenID realm white listing is out of the way (either by registering a realm or when Google removes the white list), you&#8217;d be able to log in using &#8220;https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id&#8221; as an identity URL – no special buttons required.  If they wanted it&#8217;d be pretty easy to make &#8220;google.com&#8221; provide the same discovery information, similar to what Yahoo has done.  Of course, this isn&#8217;t a big deal while the white list is in place since such sites will probably be set up with a button.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lefty</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2008/10/30/google-openi/comment-page-1/#comment-739</link>
		<dc:creator>Lefty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 09:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/?p=380#comment-739</guid>
		<description>Oh, and for what it&#039;s worth, I&#039;d say the necessity to &quot;plaster another provider-specific radio buttons and entry boxes onto the login page&quot; pretty much defeats the purpose of OpenID, but maybe that&#039;s just me...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and for what it&#8217;s worth, I&#8217;d say the necessity to &#8220;plaster another provider-specific radio buttons and entry boxes onto the login page&#8221; pretty much defeats the purpose of OpenID, but maybe that&#8217;s just me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lefty</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2008/10/30/google-openi/comment-page-1/#comment-738</link>
		<dc:creator>Lefty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/?p=380#comment-738</guid>
		<description>Yeah, looks like it&#039;s (mostly) ((but not quite, yet)) OpenID, so it seems I might have jumped the gun a little.

If I did, it&#039;s mainly because Google does indeed have this habit of not really engaging with the community at large all that well. I got very tired over the past year of listening to folks like Eric Chu spout FUD like &quot;existing open source projects don&#039;t ship on schedule&quot; (in spite of the fact that GNOME ships every six months, like clockwork), that &quot;existing open source projects are too desktop-oriented&quot; (which is simply arrant nonsense), and the like, as justifications for reinventing wheels all over the place--rather than actually working with the community--with Android...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, looks like it&#8217;s (mostly) ((but not quite, yet)) OpenID, so it seems I might have jumped the gun a little.</p>
<p>If I did, it&#8217;s mainly because Google does indeed have this habit of not really engaging with the community at large all that well. I got very tired over the past year of listening to folks like Eric Chu spout FUD like &#8220;existing open source projects don&#8217;t ship on schedule&#8221; (in spite of the fact that GNOME ships every six months, like clockwork), that &#8220;existing open source projects are too desktop-oriented&#8221; (which is simply arrant nonsense), and the like, as justifications for reinventing wheels all over the place&#8211;rather than actually working with the community&#8211;with Android&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2008/10/30/google-openi/feed/ ) in 1.17288 seconds, on Feb 10th, 2012 at 7:12 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 10th, 2012 at 8:12 pm UTC -->
